newsinsightplus.com
- 15member
- 1944AttributionSoundsMost
- March 22, 2024
- 0 Comments
BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaUS call at UN for Gaza truce linked to hostages blockedPublished27 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, EPA-EFEImage caption, The US said Russia and China had acted cynicallyBy Raffi BergBBC NewsRussia and China have blocked a US draft resolution put to the UN which for the first time called for a ceasefire and hostage releases in Gaza.While there have been previous attempts by other countries to call for a ceasefire, the US text marked a hardening of its stance towards Israel.But Russia and China used their veto. Moscow called the text “hypocritical”.The move by the US, Israel’s key ally, comes at a time of growing tensions between them.Washington has made clear that it expects Israel to lessen the intensity of its offensive in Gaza, where the Hamas-run health ministry says at least 31,988 people – mainly women and children – have been killed since the war began on 7 October. It has also said it would not support an Israeli attack on the city of Rafah without a plan to protect civilians there, and has urged Israel to allow more humanitarian aid into Gaza.Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has said that Israel will go ahead with a planned ground assault on Rafah, even without the support of its key ally.The US Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, in Tel Aviv for talks, said such an operation was not the answer.”It risks killing more civilians, it risks wreaking greater havoc with the provision of humanitarian assistance, it risks further isolating Israel around the world and jeopardising this long-term security and standing,” he said.The US – one of five permanent members of the Security Council with the power of veto – has previously blocked resolutions calling for a ceasefire, saying such a move would be wrong while delicate negotiations for a truce and hostage releases were continuing between Israel and Hamas.But on Friday it publicly changed its position, in a carefully-worded draft. “The Security Council,” the text read, “determines the imperative of an immediate and sustained ceasefire”, adding “and towards that end unequivocally supports ongoing international diplomatic efforts to secure such a ceasefire in connection with the release of all remaining hostages”.In doing so, the US linked its support for a ceasefire to the release of the Israeli hostages – 253 – held by Hamas.Although Russia and China vetoed the draft, 11 countries on the 15-member council voted in favour of it. Algeria voted against it and Guyana abstained.Ahead of the vote, Russia’s ambassador to the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, criticised the text as “exceedingly politicised”, accusing it of doing nothing to avert Israel’s planned assault on Rafah.More than half of Gaza’s 2.3 million Palestinians are sheltering in the southern city, where Israel says Hamas leaders are hiding and Hamas battalions still operate.The US ambassador to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, called Russia and China’s action “deeply, deeply cynical”.”Russia and China simply did not want to vote for a resolution that was penned by the United States, because it would rather see us fail than see this Council succeed,” she said.Speaking after talks with Mr Netanyahu, Mr Blinken said the US was trying to show the international community “a sense of urgency”. A ceasefire tied to the release of hostages, he said, was “something that everyone, including the countries that veto the resolution should have been able to get behind”.French President Emmanuel Macron said his country would now work on an alternative resolution.”What’s important to note is that the United States has changed its position, and shown its will to defend, very clearly now, a ceasefire,” Mr Macron said.”For a long time, the Americans were reticent. That reticence is now gone.”Top StoriesUS call at UN for Gaza truce linked to hostages blockedPublished9 hours agoFA defends new England kit over flag designPublished9 minutes agoLife sentence for man who murdered couple with fentanylPublished5 hours agoFeaturesGrumpy gran aged 75 is global Fortnite sensationTrump poised for billions as stock market deal passesInside the ice cream van feeding familiesFleeing Ukraine’s embattled border villagesSolar eclipse spectacle set to grip North America againUFC star squares his Muslim faith with a career in the octagonWeekly quiz: How long did this woman take to climb nearly 300 mountains?Apple becomes the latest tech giant under siege’Help my brother first’: Gazan girl’s plea as entire family killedElsewhere on the BBCThe ultimate bromanceWatch the masters of satire Peter Cook and Dudley Moore with a look back through the archivesAttributioniPlayerHow did Emma of Normandy shape early medieval England?Greg Jenner and his guests step back in time to find out…AttributionSoundsAmbition, money and deceptionThe scandalous true story of Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos, starring Amanda SeyfriedAttributioniPlayerThe last eruptionMount Vesuvius is famous for destroying Pompeii in 79AD but it last erupted in 1944AttributionSoundsMost Read1FA defends new England kit over flag design2Trump poised for billions as stock market deal passes3Stranger Things actor to officiate co-star’s wedding4Life sentence for man who murdered couple with fentanyl5Row erupts over German football kit deal6Send ‘arrogant’ Starmer a message, Sunak tells voters7UK’s highest student loan revealed to be £231,0008Million in Ukraine lose power after Russian attack9FBI probes mid-air blowout on Alaska Airlines flight10Grumpy gran aged 75 is global Fortnite sensation
[ad_1] The draft resolution put to the UN Security Council marked a hardening of its stance towards Israel.
![BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaSenegal President Macky Sall rejects blame for election chaosPublished46 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingThis video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Senegal President Macky Sall: ‘I will not apologise because I did nothing wrong’By Waihiga Mwaura & Wedaeli ChibelushiBBC News, Dakar and LondonSenegal’s president has told the BBC he does not regret delaying this year’s elections, a move that sparked deadly protests.Macky Sall said he did not make the decision alone – he was responding to concerns raised by parliamentarians.After a violent backlash, many feared the relatively stable nation was slipping into political crisis.But the attempt to push the election back by 10 months was blocked by Senegal’s top court.The vote will now take place on Sunday – a month after it was initially due.”I have no apology to make, I have done nothing wrong,” President Sall told the BBC. “All the actions that have been taken have been within the framework of the law and regulations.” Live updates from across AfricaSenegal election crisis: ‘We feel betrayed by President Macky Sall’With just three weeks to go before the 25 February election, Mr Sall announced that it would be delayed, a move that was later approved by parliament.Critics accused Mr Sall of trying to stay on beyond his term of office, which the president denied. He argued that the delay was needed to resolve a dispute over the eligibility of presidential candidates.He says it was opposition politicians who raised these concerns.”If it had not been for the National Assembly which passed the law, which referred it to me, there would not have been the postponement of the election,” he said.Mr Sall’s announcement sparked violent clashes between police and protesters, in which three people died.Many feared that Senegal’s reputation as a bastion of democracy in an unstable region was on the line.Image source, AFPImage caption, The president’s plans to delay the election sparked widespread protestsSenegal has had three peaceful handovers of power since independence and is the only country in mainland West Africa that has not experienced a coup.Mr Sall told the BBC that the recent unrest “shows that there was an information campaign targeting Senegal and its president”, as there is “just one month” between the original election date and when the vote will now take place.He added: “I am truly surprised by the value judgements made about me. If I wanted to stay, I would simply be a candidate. In Africa, everyone can have five terms if they wanted. “If that had been my decision, no-one could have stopped me, except the Senegalese people who vote.”Last week, Senegal’s main opposition leader and one of Mr Sall’s fiercest critics Ousmane Sonko and his party’s presidential candidate Bassirou Diomaye Faye were released from prison under a presidential amnesty.Mr Sonko has been prosecuted on a series of charges, all of which he says were politically motivated as a way of excluding him from the election.Because of a conviction of immoral behaviour with a minor, he was barred from contesting and Mr Faye is standing in his place.Some leading opposition candidates were also excluded from the previous election in 2019.But President Sall denied that the charges against his rivals were politically motivated. “It is not because you are a politician that you should not answer for your actions before the law,” he said.He also said Mr Sonko, and others, would have been able to stand if the elections had been delayed for longer.”We would have had the possibility of having amnesty, which would have given them back a certain number of rights,” Mr Sall said.President Sall has served two terms in office – the maximum allowed by Senegal’s constitution.In his interview with the BBC, he repeated his pledge not to overstay.”If the next president is not elected on the 24th [March], I’m leaving on 2 April regardless. That is the deadline, and I don’t intend to stay on another day,” he said.Amadou Ba, who was Mr Sall’s prime minister until he stood down to campaign, and Mr Faye are seen as the favourites among the 19 candidates.If none of them gains more than 50% of the vote, there will be a second round.More on Senegal’s 2024 election:’If I were president’: Senegalese children organise own pollOusmane Sonko: Senegalese youth hero or rabble-rouser?Related TopicsMacky SallTop StoriesLive. Varadkar resigns as taoiseach for ‘personal and political’ reasonsFamine looms in Sudan as civil war survivors tell of killings and rapesPublished12 hours agoLive. Sunak and Starmer argue over economy and Rwanda plan at PMQsFeaturesBafta TV Awards: The list of nominationsHow Kate body-double conspiracy theory spread on social mediaI took three bullets to stop Princess Anne’s kidnap. VideoI took three bullets to stop Princess Anne’s kidnapThe Staves: ‘The pressure to feel empowered is suffocating’Election poll tracker: How do the parties compare?When are the May local elections, and who can vote?What is Hong Kong’s tough new security law?Is this the worst economic inheritance since WW2?How much are prices rising for you? Try our calculatorElsewhere on the BBCThis family bonds over Race Across the WorldThese are the the things we love on the BBCAttributioniPlayerShocking moments caught on camera…The joyful moment a missing five-year-old girl is found in swampy Florida woodlandAttributioniPlayerWhat is the ‘white gaze’?Steve Garner finds out where the concept came from and what it really meansAttributionSoundsThe last eruptionMount Vesuvius is famous for destroying Pompeii in 79AD but it last erupted in 1944AttributionSoundsMost Read1Dani Alves to be freed on bail after rape conviction2HMRC reverses decision to close telephone helpline3Banksy’s urban tree artwork defaced with white paint4Train drivers set to strike again in April5Food and eating out costs drive fall in inflation6Varadkar to step down as Irish prime minister7Kate clinic privacy breach claims being ‘assessed’8Greggs hit by IT issue affecting card payments9The Crown finale leads Bafta TV Award nominations10Emma Barnett: ‘Why I wanted a baby loss certificate’](https://newsinsightplus.com/wp-content/uploads/https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/branded_news/1463D/production/_132971538_p0hkq2tr.jpg)
![BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityCultureThe ‘banned’ Star Trek episode that promised a united IrelandPublished2 hours agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsThe TroublesImage source, ParamountImage caption, Android character Data describes the “Irish unification of 2024” as a successful example of violence used to achieve political aimsBy Michael Sheils McNameeBBC NewsWhen sci-fi writer Melinda M Snodgrass sat down to write Star Trek episode The High Ground, she had little idea of the unexpected ripples of controversy it would still be making more than three decades later. “We became aware of it later… and there isn’t much you can do about it,” she says, speaking to the BBC from her home in New Mexico. “Writing for television is like laying track for a train that’s about 300 feet behind you. You really don’t have time to stop.” While the series has legions of followers steeped in its lore, that one particular episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation has lived long and prospered in infamy.It comes down to a scene in which the android character Data, played by actor Brent Spiner, talks about the “Irish unification of 2024” as an example of violence successfully achieving a political aim. Originally shown in the US in 1990, there was so much concern over the exchange that the episode was not broadcast on the BBC or Irish public broadcaster RTÉ. At the time, US TV shows often debuted internationally several years after their original broadcast. Satellite broadcaster Sky reportedly aired an edited version in 1992, cutting the crucial scene. But The High Ground was not shown by the BBC until 02:39 GMT, 29 September 2007 – and BBC Archives says it is confident this is its only transmission. Michelle O’Neill makes history as NI first ministerIs Sinn Féin’s election success a turning point?The decision not to air the episode reflects a time when a bloody conflict continued to rage in Northern Ireland, with the Provisional IRA – a paramilitary group with the stated aim of ending British rule in Northern Ireland – one of its main protagonists. Now it is 2024 – and Sinn Féin, which emerged as the political wing of the IRA, is the largest party in the devolved Stormont assembly.The party’s leader in Northern Ireland, Michelle O’Neill, became first minister last month and has predicted a referendum on Irish unity within a decade.She strikes a very different tone to Sir Keir Starmer, favourite to be the UK’s next prime minister, who has said such a poll is “not even on the horizon”.This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Michelle O’Neill became Northern Ireland’s first minister last month, the first time a Irish nationalist politician has held that roleOn social media, people have been sharing screenshots of Data’s prediction and drawing links to Sinn Féin’s electoral success.Back when Ms Snodgrass was writing the script, she did not think it would cause any problems. “Science fiction is incredibly important because it allows people to discuss difficult topics – but at arm’s length,” she says.In the episode, Data’s line does not come out of the blue.The High Ground is based on the theme of terrorism, after the Starship Enterprise’s chief medical officer Dr Beverly Crusher is abducted by the separatist Ansata group, who use murder and violence to pursue their aim of independence. “I’ve been reviewing the history of armed rebellion, and it appears that terrorism is an effective way to promote political change,” says Data.”Yes it can be,” responds Captain Jean-Luc Picard, played by Patrick Stewart, “but I have never subscribed to the theory that political power flows from the barrel of a gun.””Yet there are numerous examples of when it was successful,” Data says. “The independence of the Mexican state from Spain, the Irish unification of 2024, and the Kenzie rebellion.”Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Star Trek: The Next Generation featured Sir Patrick Stewart as Captain Jean-Luc Picard, in what has become one of his most iconic roles”I’m aware of them,” says Picard, to which Data asks: “Would it then be accurate to say that terrorism is acceptable when all options for peaceful settlement have been foreclosed?””Data, these are questions that mankind has been struggling with throughout history. Your confusion is only human.”The story has parallels with the situation in Northern Ireland at the time – something Ms Snodgrass says was deliberate. “I was a history major before I went to law school and I wanted to get into that; discuss the fact that one man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist,” she says.”I mean, these are complicated issues. And when do people feel like their back is so much against the wall that they have no choice but to turn to violence? And is that actually ever justified?”I think what I wanted to say was: if we’re talking and not shooting, we’re in a better place.”Image caption, Melinda M Snodgrass says science fiction provides a way of examining current issues through a different lensIn 1992, when the episode was due to air in the UK, the IRA ceasefire of 1994 and 1998 Good Friday Agreement were still years away.In April of that year, the Baltic Exchange bombing carried out by the IRA in the heart of London’s financial centre killed three people, and injured more than 90.Such was the atmosphere from 1988 to 1994, a ban was enforced on broadcasting the voices of members of certain groups from Northern Ireland on television and radio. Restrictions were seen as specifically targeting Sinn Féin. It resulted in the bizarre situation where prominent politicians including Martin McGuinness and Gerry Adams had their voices dubbed by actors (Mr Adams, famously, was voiced at times by Oscar-nominated actor Stephen Rea). Reflecting on the Star Trek episode, Prof Robert Savage of Boston College says: “It was amazing it was censored.”His latest book – Northern Ireland, the BBC, and Censorship in Thatcher’s Britain – covers the period when the episode was pulled. “The argument I think the robot [Data] asks you is basically just: does terrorism work? If there are no alternatives, if you’ve tried every other avenue to try to affect change, is it acceptable? To use terrorism?”And it’s a very human question. But [Jean-Luc Picard] doesn’t answer the question! That would have unsettled somebody like Thatcher,” Prof Savage adds.This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, The roots of Northern Ireland’s Troubles lie deep in Irish historyThere is some murkiness about how a decision was reached not to broadcast the programme at the time. BBC Archives confirmed the 2007 broadcast of the episode and was “satisfied” any other screening would have been listed.The BBC’s press office said it had spoken to “a number of people” about why a ban may have been implemented, but was unable to get this information “as it dates quite far back”.A spokesman for Sky said he had looked into it, but could not confirm it had broadcast an edited version of the episode in 1992 – or what its reasoning might have been for doing so.RTÉ noted that TV guides from the time show it had broadcast Star Trek: The Next Generation, but did not have further information in its acquisitions system, and could not find anyone from the time to speak to. “I think this would probably have stirred a memory if I had been made aware of this at the time, but I am afraid it rings no bells at all,” said Lord John Birt, who was director general of the BBC from 1992 to 2000, and before this served as deputy director general. If the episode had been removed, it would probably have been a decision made at operational level in Network Television, he said.More than three decades on, the picture in Northern Ireland has changed. Ms Snodgrass says she was “thrilled” when the Good Friday Agreement was signed, adding it had allowed Northern Ireland to prosper. She notes Games of Thrones, a television series based on books by George RR Martin (who she knows well and has co-authored work with) was filmed in the region in recent years – something which has given a big boost to the economy. “[At the time] 2024 seemed a long way away. I probably should have made it, you know, 2224! I just pulled that number and it didn’t occur to me that suddenly we would be here.”Related TopicsSinn FéinNorthern IrelandThe TroublesStar TrekMore on this storyHow am-dram sent Sir Patrick Stewart to the starsPublished7 October 2023Star Trek predicts a united IrelandPublished14 April 2007Michelle O’Neill makes history as NI first ministerPublished3 FebruaryTop StoriesGaza receives first airdrop of US humanitarian aidPublished8 hours agoGazans crowdfund thousands for uncertain escapePublished4 hours agoRaye makes history by winning six Brit AwardsPublished3 hours agoFeaturesBrits red carpet: Black dresses, pops of neon and a giraffeThe Papers: Hunt aims to cut tax or risks ‘losing grey vote’How Israel-Gaza war is spilling into cultural life’There was heartache but we had to keep going’Kate, the King and three other big challenges for royalsFive ways to save on train tickets as fares riseThe ‘banned’ Star Trek episode that promised a united Ireland’King of Chaos’ Imran Khan keeps winning even behind barsCan green ‘super powders’ really make you healthy?Elsewhere on the BBCFrom the seizure of Crimea to the war in UkraineThe story of a decade of clashes, told by the Western leaders who traded blows with PutinAttributioniPlayerFrom the largest ship to disasters on deck…A closer look at times when cruise ships have caused commotionAttributioniPlayer’I never tried to be famous…it was accidental’Michael Parkinson with guests Ricky Gervais, Michael Palin and Kate AdieAttributioniPlayerIt’s make or break timeAnother set of eager entrepreneurs hope to impress the fearsome panelAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Nadiya Hussain: A letter to my teenage daughter2The ‘banned’ Star Trek episode that promised a united Ireland3Hunt aims to cut tax or risks ‘losing grey vote’4Raye makes history by winning six Brit Awards5Russia publishes German army meeting on Ukraine6Gazans crowdfund thousands for uncertain escape7Brits red carpet: Black dresses, pops of neon and a giraffe8AI and drones in £800m Budget technology package9’There was heartache but we had to keep going’10Kate, the King and three other big challenges for royals](https://newsinsightplus.com/wp-content/uploads/https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/branded_news/118D0/production/_132788817_tng_160_irish_unification_1.jpg)
