BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaSimon Harris: Profile of a man in a hurry to the topPublished28 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty Images/NurPhotoImage caption, Simon Harris, now 37, organised his first political meeting when he was a 16-year-old schoolboyBy Eimear FlanaganBBC News NISimon Harris is set to replace Leo Varadkar, not only as taoiseach but also as the youngest person ever to lead the Republic of Ireland.At 37, he is a year younger than Mr Varadkar was when he took the same job in 2017.For Simon Harris, it has been a rapid rise to the top of Irish politics, but then he did start out very early.The County Wicklow native organised his first political meeting at just 16 years of age.He was also in such a hurry to start his career in politics that he dropped out of college without finishing his degree.”I know, in many ways, my career has been a bit odd,” Mr Harris told Hot Press magazine in 2022. “I was a county councillor at 22. I was a TD (member of the Irish Parliament) at 24. “I was a junior minister at 27. I was the health minister at 29. “Life came at me a lot faster than I expected it to.”Mr Harris was confirmed as Fine Gael leader after he was the only candidate to seek the role – now he is on course to become taoiseach following Mr Varadkar’s shock resignation announcement on Wednesday.Who is Simon Harris?Image source, Getty Images/NurPhotoImage caption, Simon Harris has served as a minister in the Irish cabinet for the past eight yearsMr Harris was born in 1986 and grew up in the coastal town of Greystones, County Wicklow.The eldest of three children, he is the son of a taxi driver and a special needs assistant.His younger brother Adam is autistic – a fact which Mr Harris said kickstarted his own involvement in politics when he was 16.”I was really frustrated – as that moody, opinionated teenager – with the lack of information around autism,” he told Hotpress.”I saw the stress and strain my parents went through, and called a public meeting in my hometown.”The teenager invited autistic people and their families to a gathering in his local parish hall.About 60 people attended the event, which resulted in the establishment of a new autism support and lobby group. This Twitter post cannot be displayed in your browser. Please enable Javascript or try a different browser.View original content on TwitterThe BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.Skip twitter post by Simon Harris TDAllow Twitter content?This article contains content provided by Twitter. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. You may want to read Twitter’s cookie policy, external and privacy policy, external before accepting. To view this content choose ‘accept and continue’.Accept and continueThe BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.End of twitter post by Simon Harris TDAs a schoolboy, Mr Harris attended St David’s Holy Faith Secondary School in Greystones before beginning a degree in journalism and French at Dublin Institute of Technology (DIT).However, the future minister for further and higher education dropped out of college during the penultimate year of his four-year degree course.He deferred his studies to work as a parliamentary assistant to Fine Gael Senator Frances Fitzgerald, but very soon he entered elected politics himself.In 2009 he became a councillor in Wicklow, attracting the highest individual vote of any candidate in the county.When Fine Gael swept to power in 2011 to lead a new coalition government, Mr Harris won a seat for the party in Wicklow. Aged 24, he was “the baby of the House” as the youngest member of the 31st Dáil (Irish parliament).Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, As the youngest member of the Irish Parliament, Simon Harris met the late Queen Elizabeth in Dublin in 2011His got his first cabinet role in 2016, taking on the prestigious but difficult role of health minister.The following summer he married his long-term girlfriend, children’s cardiac nurse Caoimhe Wade.His brother Adam was best man at the ceremony.Mr Harris is now father to two children.Image source, RTEImage caption, Mr Harris married aged 30 and has since had two childrenIn 2018, he intervened in the case of a nine-year-old schoolboy who was born in Dublin but was facing deportation to China.Eric Zhi Ying Xue had never been outside Ireland, but was not entitled to Irish citizenship due to a 2004 law change.”Quite frankly, Eric is Irish,” Mr Harris told BBC News NI at the time.”This is his home. This is his country. I really hope common sense can prevail.”He appealed to the Department of Justice and, after a wider campaign led by the boy’s school, Eric was granted leave to stay. Covid-19 gaffeMr Harris had served as health minister for more than three and a half years when he faced his biggest challenge – the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.Image source, Getty Images/NurPhotoImage caption, As health minister, Simon Harris led Ireland’s initial response to the coronovirus emergencyThe Republic of Ireland took early precautions, closing all schools and colleges almost a fortnight before the UK enforced its lockdown.But six weeks into the national emergency, Mr Harris made a surprising gaffe regarding the name of the disease.Speaking about the prospect of a future vaccine, he said: “Remember this is coronavirus Covid-19, that means there have been 18 other coronaviruses and I don’t think they have successfully found a vaccine for any.”But Covid-19 was named by the World Health Organization to reflect the year the disease was discovered, having been first identified in China in late 2019. Widely ridiculed on social media for his lack of knowledge, Mr Harris apologised for what he described as an “awful boo-boo”. Two months later he was replaced as health minister when a new coalition government was formed.Mr Harris was moved to a newly-created department, becoming minister for further and higher education, research, innovation and science.’My most important job’He still holds that job and still lives in Wicklow with his young family. In an opinion piece to mark Father’s Day in 2022 he said parenthood was “the most important job I have, and ever will have”.”For me, fatherhood changed my whole life. The hours I was happy to spend at my desk can sometimes be spent worrying about missed moments and milestones with the children,” he wrote.However, commentators have noted Mr Harris has made no secret of his political ambitions.His name began to circulate as a frontrunner as soon as it was clear the job of taoiseach was up for grabs. Related TopicsLeo VaradkarRepublic of IrelandMore on this storyVaradkar steps down for ‘personal and political’ reasonsPublished4 days agoI am no longer best man to be Irish PM – VaradkarPublished3 days agoTop StoriesZelensky hits back after Russia links Ukraine to concert attackPublished5 hours agoRosenberg: As Russia mourns, how will Putin react to concert attack?Published3 hours agoTriple lock for pensions stays if we win election, says HuntPublished4 hours agoFeaturesIs now the time Palestinian politics can start afresh?Did Russia ignore US ‘extremist’ attacks warning?The Brazilian teen who scored winner against EnglandAttributionSportYour pictures on the theme of ‘reflections’‘Having a certificate of loss proves my baby existed’Kate cancer diagnosis rewrites story of past weeksSimon Harris – the man on the brink of Irish history First woman completes one of world’s toughest racesEngland kits ‘should connect people’Elsewhere on the BBCWhy do people behave the way they do on social media?Marianna Spring investigates extraordinary cases of online hate to find out…AttributioniPlayerCritically acclaimed and utterly compelling…Masterful, claustrophobic drama starring Sofie Gråbøl as a troubled prison guardAttributioniPlayerFrom triumph to tragedy…After more than 30 years of service, America’s space shuttle took to the skies for the last timeAttributioniPlayerCan new evidence solve aviation’s greatest mystery?Ten years after the Malaysian Airlines flight disappeared, new technology may explain whyAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Zelensky hits back after Russia links Ukraine to concert attack2Boy, 12, charged with attempted murder3’Most unwanted’ dog finds home after four years4Woman arrested as missing young siblings found5Simon Harris takes big step towards taoiseach role6Give Kate and family ‘time and space to heal’7Passenger reported overboard from cruise ship8The man in the iron lung: How Paul Alexander lived life to the full9Avanti to pay train drivers £600 a shift for overtime10Rosenberg: As Russia mourns, how will Putin react to concert attack?

[ad_1] The favourite to replace Leo Varadkar as taoiseach organised his first political meeting aged 16.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaAaron Rodgers and Jesse Ventura on RFK Jr vice-presidential shortlistPublished57 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsUS election 2024Image source, ReutersBy Mike WendlingBBC NewsIndependent presidential candidate Robert F Kennedy Jr is considering American football quarterback Aaron Rodgers or former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura as his vice-presidential running mate.They are among others on a shortlist of potential nominees, Mr Kennedy’s campaign said on Tuesday.Campaign officials would not confirm who else is on the list.Mr Kennedy, 70, launched a bid for president last year.He previously considering challenging Joe Biden for the Democratic Party nomination, and now as an independent faces a battle to get his name on the ballot in most or all 50 US states.Mr Kennedy, a member of America’s most famous political family, worked as an environmental lawyer before founding an anti-vaccine pressure group. Mr Rodgers, a star quarterback who currently plays for the New York Jets, was injured at the start of his first game last season but has vowed to return to the game in 2024. Off the field, he has been criticised for speaking about vaccine skepticism and making a number of controversial statements. Mr Kennedy recently posted a picture of them hiking together.The two faces of Robert F Kennedy JrThe people who want Robert F Kennedy Jr to be presidentIt’s unclear how the quarterback could combine a vice-presidential campaign with a gruelling NFL season that would clash with November’s election.Mr Ventura, a former professional wrestler and actor, was elected as governor of Minnesota as a member of the Reform Party, defeating both the Democrat and Republican nominees in a surprise upset in 1998.He served one four-year term and since leaving office has regularly hinted about rejoining the political fray. Starting in 2017, he hosted a show on Kremlin-owned RT America until the station ceased operations after the start of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Last month he appeared at a campaign event with Mr Kennedy in Arizona. Ballot access rules for independent presidential candidates vary widely from state to state, with most requiring candidates to collect signatures before a summer deadline. A number of states require independents to pick a vice-presidential running mate before applying for access.The Kennedy campaign says it has so far qualified in four states – Utah, Nevada, New Hampshire and Hawaii. American Values 2024, a political action committee backing Mr Kennedy – and which bankrolled a Super Bowl advertisement for his candidacy – says it has collected enough signatures to get his name on the ballot in Arizona and Georgia.This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Watch: RFK Jr v JFK – can you spot the difference?Related TopicsAnti-vaccination movementUS election 2024United StatesMore on this storyThe people who want Robert F Kennedy Jr to be presidentPublished9 October 2023The two faces of Robert F Kennedy JrPublished2 MarchTop StoriesNo 10 says Tory donor’s alleged comments about Abbott were racistPublished2 hours agoBBC report into treatment of Gaza medics ‘very disturbing’ – CameronPublished5 hours agoGaza medics tell BBC that Israeli troops beat and humiliated themPublished18 hours agoFeaturesThe gangsters and rebels jostling over power in HaitiCan royals move on from Kate photo media storm?The Ukrainian sea drones hunting Russian warshipsHow the miners’ strike changed the role of womenMeet the pop star who brought some cheek to the Brit AwardsWhat is TikTok and could the US ban it?’We don’t feel the joy of Ramadan in Rafah’ Video’We don’t feel the joy of Ramadan in Rafah’Schoolboy recounts daring escape from Nigerian kidnap gangWhen wind turbine blades get old what’s next?Elsewhere on the BBCThe powerful emotional impact of Pink Floyd’s musicShine On You Crazy Diamond has helped people through their hardest timesAttributionSoundsFrom the largest ship to disasters on deck…A closer look at times when cruise ships have caused commotionAttributioniPlayer’I was mad for stuff but I didn’t realise I wasn’t happy’Stuart Mitchell’s search for happiness will make us all question the true cost of livingAttributionSoundsMisled with the promise of a home…Panorama investigates the mobile home swindleAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Navalny ally Leonid Volkov attacked in Lithuania2UK to pay failed asylum seekers to move to Rwanda3No 10 says Tory donor’s alleged comments were racist4Ashes and 35 bodies removed from funeral home5Ghislaine Maxwell appeals sex abuse conviction6Can royals move on from Kate photo media storm?7Ukraine-based groups claim raids into Russia8Andrew Tate and brother can be extradited to UK9NHS England to stop prescribing puberty blockers10Warning after cat falls into Japan chemical vat

[ad_1] The independent candidate’s campaign says Aaron Rodgers and Jesse Ventura are on the shortlist for the role.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC SportMenuHomeFootballCricketFormula 1Rugby URugby LTennisGolfBoxingAthleticsMoreA-Z SportsAmerican FootballAthleticsBasketballBoxingCricketCyclingDartsDisability SportFootballFormula 1Gaelic GamesGet InspiredGolfGymnasticsHorse RacingMixed Martial ArtsMotorsportNetballOlympic SportsRugby LeagueRugby UnionSnookerSwimmingTennisWinter SportsFull Sports A-ZMore from SportEnglandScotlandWalesNorthern IrelandMy SportMatch of the DaySports Personality5 Live SportSport on the BBCNews FeedsHelp & FAQsTennisLive ScoresResultsCalendarVideoTomorrow’s Order of PlaySimona Halep to return at Miami Open after ban reducedPublished1 hour agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Simona Halep beat Serena Williams to win the Wimbledon title in 2019Former Wimbledon champion Simona Halep will return to tennis at the Miami Open later this month after her four-year doping ban was reduced to nine months. The 32-year-old Romanian has accepted a wildcard entry into the tournament, which starts on 17 March.Halep’s original punishment was cut after an appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas).”I’m thrilled to let you all know that I will be making my return in two weeks,” she said on Thursday”Thank you to the tournament for giving me this opportunity and I cannot wait to be back on court and competing.”Halep, who won the French Open in 2018 and Wimbledon the following year, has not played competitively since the US Open in August 2022, having failed a doping test at Flushing Meadows.Halep tested positive for roxadustat – an anti-anaemia drug which stimulates the production of red blood cells in the body.In May 2023, she was charged again by the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) – this time for irregularities in her athlete biological passport (ABP).An independent tribunal ruled Halep had “intentionally” doped and gave her a four-year ban.Halep appealed against the decision, and on Tuesday it was announced her case was partially upheld with Cas saying that “on the balance of probabilities” she had not taken roxadustat intentionally.Related TopicsTennisTop StoriesLive. Europa League: Clinical Rangers lead Benfica after breathless first halfLive. Europa League: West Ham visit Freiburg after Liverpool thrash SpartaLive. Chelsea beat Man City to reach Women’s League Cup final – reactionElsewhere on the BBCCan new evidence solve aviation’s greatest mystery?Ten years after the Malaysian Airlines flight disappeared, new technology may explain whyAttributioniPlayerAre women faster than men at ultramarathons?Tim Harford and Lucy Proctor ask if women are better long-distance runners than menAttributionSoundsIn a battle for survival, what would you do?Strikes in Port Talbot spark a revolution and force a family to go on the runAttributioniPlayerFrom a karaoke version of The Beatles to RihannaGavin & Stacey star Joanna Page journeys through her life and career in ten significant songsAttributionSoundsElsewhere in Sport’Any win over Ngannou will be better than Fury’s’Death, disaster and redemption – England’s tumultuous tour of IndiaBlackstenius hat-trick helps Arsenal to League Cup final. VideoBlackstenius hat-trick helps Arsenal to League Cup finalHow De Rossi has ‘revived’ Roma after Mourinho’Confident, powerful, sharp’ – how Joshua got back to his best. Video’Confident, powerful, sharp’ – how Joshua got back to his bestWhy England have so much to prove in foothills of Himalayas’Perfect game’ – Care’s favourite England memories’Joshua and Ngannou are absolute specimens’ Video’Joshua and Ngannou are absolute specimens”Best midfielder in the world’ – Man City’s invincible RodriF1 Q&A: Your questions answered after Bahrain GPRider, runner, winner – the second coming of MeierMeet McLaren’s first female development driver. VideoMeet McLaren’s first female development driverCan PSG afford to leave out departing Mbappe?’Underground king’ Ngannou confident of beating Joshua. Video’Underground king’ Ngannou confident of beating JoshuaWhich player has come of age? Garth Crooks’ Team of the WeekIs Foden ‘the best in the Premier League right now’?Pogba: The backstory, the wasted talent & why it could be the end

[ad_1] Former Wimbledon champion Simona Halep will return to tennis at the Miami Open later this month after her four-year doping ban was reduced to nine months. The 32-year-old Romanian…

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC SportMenuHomeFootballCricketFormula 1Rugby URugby LTennisGolfBoxingAthleticsMoreA-Z SportsAmerican FootballAthleticsBasketballBoxingCricketCyclingDartsDisability SportFootballFormula 1Gaelic GamesGet InspiredGolfGymnasticsHorse RacingMixed Martial ArtsMotorsportNetballOlympic SportsRugby LeagueRugby UnionSnookerSwimmingTennisWinter SportsFull Sports A-ZMore from SportEnglandScotlandWalesNorthern IrelandMy SportMatch of the DaySports Personality5 Live SportSport on the BBCNews FeedsHelp & FAQsTennisLive ScoresResultsCalendarVideoTomorrow’s Order of PlaySimona Halep: Doping ban reduced for former Wimbledon championPublished18 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Simona Halep beat Serena Williams to win the Wimbledon women’s singles in 2019By Jonathan JurejkoBBC Sport Two-time Grand Slam champion Simona Halep’s four-year ban for doping has been reduced to nine months by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.The decision means Romanian former world number one Halep, 32, can return to tennis as soon as possible.In response to the ruling, Halep hit out at “scandalous accusations”.While her case was partially upheld, Cas ruled Halep “on the balance of probabilities” had not taken roxadustat intentionally.Halep, who won the 2018 French Open and Wimbledon in 2019, always maintained her innocence after being charged with two separate doping offences.She faced two charges: one for testing positive for roxadustat and another for irregularities in her athlete biological passport (ABP).Halep, who was originally banned until October 2026, feared her career would be over if the original decision was upheld.”My faith in the process was tested by the scandalous accusations that were levelled against me, and by the seemingly unlimited resources that were aligned against me,” Halep said.”I cannot wait to return to the tour.”The International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA), which is responsible for testing within the sport and brought the investigation, said it “respected” the decision. What did Cas say?Halep tested positive for roxadustat – an anti-anaemia drug which stimulates the production of red blood cells in the body – at the US Open in August 2022.An investigation by the ITIA concluded the contamination was likely to have come from a collagen supplement called Keto MCT.In a ruling announced on Tuesday, Cas said: “Having carefully considered all the evidence put before it, the panel determined that Ms Halep had established, on the balance of probabilities, that the roxadustat entered her body through the consumption of a contaminated supplement which she had used in the days shortly before 29 August 2022.”The roxadustat, as detected in her sample, came from that contaminated product. “As a result, the Cas Panel determined that Ms Halep had also established, on the balance of probabilities, that her anti-doping rule violations were not intentional.”Although the Cas Panel found that Ms Halep did bear some level of fault or negligence for her violations, as she did not exercise sufficient care when using the Keto MCT supplement, it concluded that she bore no significant fault or negligence.”Halep was charged in May 2023 with a second separate offence when the ITIA said irregularities were found in her athlete biological passport.The ABP programme collects and compares biological data to spot discrepancies in an athlete’s blood over time that suggest possible doping.Three experts – Dr Jakob Morkeberg, Dr Laura Garvican-Lewis and Professor Giuseppe d’Onofrio – assessed 51 valid samples of Halep’s blood and each concluded there was “likely doping”.Halep’s defence suggested the irregularities spotted were caused by factors including blood loss during an operation and periods when she was not training.Cas said it was “not comfortably satisfied” Halep had committed an offence and the panel “therefore dismissed that charge”. Is Halep’s career back on track?Halep, who has earned £32.2m in career prize money, is free to return to the WTA Tour after the nine-month ban was backdated.She was charged with two offences by the ITIA on 7 October 2022 and has not played since.The backdated nine-month ban expired on 6 July, 2023. Halep’s results from 29 August, 2022 – when she gave a positive sample – 7 October 2022, along with her ranking points and prize money in this period, remain disqualified.Before the Cas decision was announced on Tuesday, she conceded the four-year ban remaining in place would likely end her career.But, speaking after the three-day appeal hearing in February, Halep said she was confident of clearing her name and making a return to tennis.In the past few weeks, she has posted videos of on-court training sessions and now it looks likely one of the biggest names on the WTA Tour is set to compete again at the highest level.Halep will also receive 20,000 Swiss francs (£17,800) from the ITIA as a contribution towards her legal fees and other expenses in the proceedings.”An essential element of the anti-doping process is a player’s ability to appeal, and the ITIA respects both their right to do so, and the outcome,” said ITIA chief executive officer Karen Moorhouse. “We await the full reasoned decision and will review it thoroughly in due course.”Live scores, results and order of playAlerts: Get tennis news sent to your phoneRelated TopicsTennisTop StoriesHalep’s doping ban reduced to nine monthsPublished18 minutes agoEngland to face the Republic in Euros qualifyingPublished3 hours agoBen Sulayem faces new allegations over Vegas track clearancePublished4 hours agoElsewhere on the BBCCan newly-divorced Maxine find love amidst the chaos?East Midlands-set comedy, starring Morgana Robinson, Matthew Horne and Beverly CallardAttributioniPlayerThe two-headed dog experiments that shocked the worldOne of Vladimir Demikhov’s creations lived for 29 daysAttributionSoundsSorting the fact from fictionRob Brydon, David Mitchell and Lee Mack untangle the tallest of celebrity talesAttributioniPlayerIs Gina Rinehart a good or bad billionaire?How did the mining magnate go on to become Australia’s richest person?AttributionSoundsElsewhere in SportF1 Q&A: Your questions answered after Bahrain GPRider, runner, winner – the second coming of MeierMeet McLaren’s first female development driver. VideoMeet McLaren’s first female development driverCan PSG afford to leave out departing Mbappe?’Underground king’ Ngannou confident of beating Joshua. Video’Underground king’ Ngannou confident of beating JoshuaWhich player has come of age? Garth Crooks’ Team of the WeekIs Foden ‘the best in the Premier League right now’?’One of worst displays I’ve ever seen’ – Sheff Utd’s new lowAre Bayern Munich set for their worst season in over a decade?Reekie considers Rome diversion before Olympics’A legendary figure’ – darts commentator Green diesGB’s ‘most exciting crop for generations’ now look to ParisWho would make up a Six Nations sevens team? VideoWho would make up a Six Nations sevens team?’Verstappen win sets chilling tone for the season”Superstar’ Macario scores first goal in 644 days’It’s never over’ – Liverpool proving kings of the late winnerCaudery achieves ‘dream’ gold on emotional nightPogba: The backstory, the wasted talent & why it could be the end

[ad_1] Halep tested positive for roxadustat – an anti-anaemia drug which stimulates the production of red blood cells in the body – at the US Open in August 2022. An…

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaYaya Dillo: Chad opposition leader killed in shootoutPublished33 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, ISSOUF SANOGOImage caption, Opposition politician Yaya Dillo was a vocal opponent of his cousin, President Mahamat DébyBy Mayeni Jones & Wedaeli ChibelushiBBC News, Lagos and LondonA leading critic of Chad’s military leader, Mahamat Déby, has been killed in a shootout with security forces, officials say.Yaya Dillo’s death comes after the government blamed him for a deadly attack on the country’s security agency. He denied the accusation.On Wednesday, heavy gunfire was heard near his party’s headquarters in the capital, N’Djamena.Mr Dillo was also a cousin of President Déby, who has been in power since 2021. Mr Déby was named by the army to succeed his father who was killed by rebels after three decades in power. The unrest in the Central African country follows the announcement that presidential election will be held on 6 May.These elections are intended to return the country to constitutional rule.Before his death, Mr Dillo was widely predicted to be his cousin’s main opponent in the election.He was the leader of the Socialist Party Without Borders (PSF).Communications Minister Abderaman Koulamallah told the AFP news agency that Mr Dillo had died on Wednesday “where he had retreated, at the headquarters of his party. He didn’t want to surrender and fired on law enforcement”.The authorities said 12 others also died in the shootout.Mobile phone and internet networks in Chad have been down since the reported attack on the National Security Agency (ANSE) headquarters.On Wednesday, Mr Dillo said the accusation he was behind the attack was intended “to make me afraid so that I don’t go to the election”.The government had accused Mr Dillo’s PSF colleague, Ahmed Torabi, of attempting to assassinate the president of the Supreme Court on Tuesday.Mr Torabi was arrested and shot dead, the PSF said.Wednesday was not Mr Dillo’s first violent run-in with security forces.When running against the current president’s father, Idriss Déby, for the presidency in 2021, state forces killed Mr Dillo’s mother, son and three others, the PSF said.The party said the assailants were attempting to arrest Mr Dillo.At the time, the government contested the PSF’s death toll, saying three people had been killed.You may be interested in:Africa Live: Latest updates from the continentA quick guide to ChadWhy does France have military bases in Africa?Related TopicsChadTop StoriesSarah killer should not have been in Met – inquiryPublished6 minutes agoLive. More than 100 reported killed as crowd waits for Gaza aidChecking Israel’s claim to have killed 10,000 Hamas fightersPublished1 hour agoFeaturesChecking Israel’s claim to have killed 10,000 Hamas fightersRaye’s path to the Brits: ‘It’s not been the simplest story’Born on 29 February: ‘Being a leapling feels special’Non-doms: What does non-domiciled mean?Why Iranians look dimly on first chance to vote since unrestWhat are assisted dying, assisted suicide and euthanasia?Sheffield musical ‘reminds us of what we’ve lost’What’s at stake for Biden and Trump as both visit borderWhy a skatepark has been given listed statusElsewhere on the BBCWhat is it really like to be a monk?’To be a monk is something very vast, very high and very beautiful’AttributioniPlayer’We have built the world, perhaps inadvertently, for men’Philanthropist Melinda French Gates on what she’s learned from her life so farAttributionSoundsFrom the largest ship to disasters on deck…A closer look at times when cruise ships have caused commotionAttributioniPlayerThe screening dilemma…Could good intentions to detect illnesses early actually be causing more harm?AttributionSoundsMost Read1The Hairy Bikers star Dave Myers dies at 662Father of Brianna killer jailed for sex offences3Putin warns West against sending troops to Ukraine4Steve Coogan and firms sued over Richard III film5William condemns antisemitism rise on synagogue visit6Hundreds to be rehomed over concrete fears7Checking Israel’s claim to have killed 10,000 Hamas fighters8Gove investigated by Commons standards watchdog9Pogba ‘sad and shocked’ at four-year ban for dopingAttributionSport10Body Shop to shut 75 stores and cut hundreds of jobs

[ad_1] Yaya Dillo was a leading critic of Chad’s military ruler, Mahamat Déby, and was also his cousin.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaIllinois judge kicks Trump off primary ballotPublished15 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsUS election 2024Image source, Getty ImagesBy Madeline HalpertBBC News, New YorkA judge in Illinois ruled that Donald Trump engaged in insurrection and has barred him from the state’s primary ballot – though she put the ruling on hold pending an appeal. Two other states – Colorado and Maine – have removed Mr Trump from their primary ballots for violating a 14th Amendment “insurrection” clause. The final outcome will likely be decided by the US Supreme Court.Illinois’ primary election is scheduled for 19 March. Early voting in the primary has already begun. Mr Trump – the front-runner Republican presidential candidate – will remain on the ballot until at least Friday while he has time to appeal against the order. Cook county circuit judge Tracie Porter agreed with voters who argued Mr Trump had violated the US constitution’s 14th Amendment because of his role in the 6 January Capitol riot. It comes after Colorado’s Supreme Court barred Mr Trump from appearing on the Republican primary ballot in December, arguing Mr Trump’s actions during the 2021 Capitol riot amounted to insurrection. Why Trump ballot eligibility is before Supreme CourtUS court sceptical of move to bar Trump from ballotIn her ruling, Judge Porter called Colorado’s rationale “compelling”. She argued the state’s Board of Elections was wrong to reject a previous bid to kick Mr Trump off the ballot. “The Illinois State Board of Election shall remove Donald J. Trump from the ballot for the General Primary Election on March 19, 2024, or cause any votes cast for him to be suppressed,” she said.A Trump spokesperson has called the ruling “unconstitutional” and vowed to appeal against it.”The Soros-funded Democrat front-groups continue to attempt to interfere in the election and deny President Trump his rightful place on the ballot,” the spokesperson said.Mr Trump has already appealed against the Colorado case to the Supreme Court. The top court heard arguments in the case earlier this month, appearing sceptical of Colorado’s decision to ban Mr Trump from the ballot. The legal challenge hinges on a Civil War-era constitutional amendment that bans anyone who has “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” from holding federal office.But Supreme Court justices have asked tough questions of those representing Colorado voters in favour of banning Mr Trump. Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked if there could be a “disenfranchising effect” if voters were not allowed to decide for themselves whether they wanted Mr Trump as president. The Illinois judge’s ruling comes after the Supreme Court agreed on Wednesday to hear yet another case involving Mr Trump. The 6-3 conservative majority court will decide whether the former president has immunity shielding him from a lawsuit over his attempts to overturn the 2020 election. Related TopicsUS Supreme CourtUS election 2024Donald TrumpUnited StatesMore on this storyWhy Trump ballot eligibility is before Supreme CourtPublished8 FebruaryUS court sceptical of move to bar Trump from ballotPublished8 FebruaryTop StoriesProtests descending into mob rule, PM warns policePublished3 hours agoFamily’s anger at police failures as Emma Caldwell’s killer is jailedPublished5 hours agoWatch: How I confronted Emma Caldwell’s killer. VideoWatch: How I confronted Emma Caldwell’s killerPublished6 hours agoFeaturesThe Papers: Cut to non-dom status considered and Harry court setbackHow police missed the chance to catch Emma’s killerSarah Smith: Protest vote over Gaza is election warning Biden cannot ignoreBorn on 29 February: ‘Being a leapling feels special’Two children ran away. It took 13 years to get home againS Korea doctors face arrest if they don’t end strikeWhy Google’s ‘woke’ AI problem won’t be an easy fixFrench readers enjoy world’s only four-year newspaper’I was inundated with incel messages within an hour’Elsewhere on the BBCThe powerful emotional impact of Pink Floyd’s musicShine On You Crazy Diamond has helped people through their hardest timesAttributionSoundsExperience Apollo 11’s adventure first-hand!Discover the awe-inspiring journey of Apollo 11 and its crew with newly released cockpit audioAttributioniPlayerWhat holds us back from exercising as we age?James Gallagher explores the mental and physical barriers that may stop usAttributionSoundsHow close are we to nuclear Armageddon?The Doomsday Clock is the closest it’s ever been to midnight – Jane Corbin investigatesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Cut to non-dom status considered and Harry court setback2Protests descending into mob rule, PM warns police3’Angry families turned up to find me dressed as Willy Wonka’4Curb Your Enthusiasm star Richard Lewis dies aged 765Family’s anger at police as Emma’s killer jailed6Moon lander pictured on its side with snapped leg7McConnell to step down as Senate Republican leader8One dead and two missing after Channel rescue9Illinois judge kicks Trump off primary ballot10French readers enjoy world’s only four-year newspaper

[ad_1] The judge has put her ruling on hold to give Mr Trump time to appeal before the state’s primary election.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaUS lawmakers reach deal to temporarily avert government shutdownPublished24 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Republican Mitch McConnell (left) and Democrat Chuck Schumer seen in Congress on TuesdayBy Mike Wendling & Max MatzaBBC NewsTop US lawmakers have reached a tentative deal to avert a partial government shutdown ahead of a Friday deadline to approve funding.Four funding bills will now be extended to 8 March while the rest of the budget will be extended to March 22.”We are in agreement that Congress must work in a bipartisan manner to fund our government,” top US lawmakers said in a joint statement.The House is expected to vote on the stopgap measure as early as Thursday.Democrats and Republicans have been far apart in the budget negotiations on border security and aid to Ukraine.Republicans control the House by a slim majority, while Democrats hold the Senate by a single seat. Spending bills to keep the US government open require buy-in from both parties in order to advance through both chambers to the president’s desk for signature.There have been 10 US government shutdowns or partial shutdowns over the past four decades. The bipartisan deal was struck by House and Senate negotiators on Wednesday, one day after congressional lawmakers travelled to the White House to meet President Joe Biden.It will be “voted on by the House and Senate this week,” according to a statement released by House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries.The congressional leaders now face the difficult task of convincing rank and file lawmakers to support the deal. The Speaker faces fierce objections from right-wing lawmakers in his ranks who want spending cuts and insist any further support for Ukraine should be tied to more money for US border security. Those same members booted out the previous Speaker, Kevin McCarthy, in October, after they were angered by a short-term budget deal that Mr McCarthy made with Democrats. If a deal is not reached, roughly 20% of government departments, including agencies that oversee agriculture, transportation and veterans affairs, will temporarily close by 12:01 on Saturday.Other federal funding, including defence spending and homeland security and state department budgets, will expire a week later. Past shutdowns have led to furloughs of government workers and the closure of national parks. Why shutdowns seem to only happen in USThis video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Watch: How does a government shutdown impact the US?Related TopicsChuck SchumerUS CongressUnited StatesJoe BidenMore on this storyWhy shutdowns seem to only happen in USPublished13 November 2023Top StoriesProtests descending into mob rule, PM warns policePublished1 hour agoFamily’s anger at police failures as Emma Caldwell’s killer is jailedPublished3 hours agoWatch: How I confronted Emma Caldwell’s killer. VideoWatch: How I confronted Emma Caldwell’s killerPublished5 hours agoFeaturesHow police missed the chance to catch Emma’s killerSarah Smith: Protest vote over Gaza is election warning Biden cannot ignoreTwo children ran away. It took 13 years to get home againS Korea doctors face arrest if they don’t end strikeWhy Google’s ‘woke’ AI problem won’t be an easy fixFrench readers enjoy world’s only four-year newspaper’I was inundated with incel messages within an hour’Listen: Panic alarms and bodyguards: How unsafe are MPs? AudioListen: Panic alarms and bodyguards: How unsafe are MPs?AttributionSounds’My mother’s body was left by smugglers in the desert’Elsewhere on the BBCThe powerful emotional impact of Pink Floyd’s musicShine On You Crazy Diamond has helped people through their hardest timesAttributionSoundsExperience Apollo 11’s adventure first-hand!Discover the awe-inspiring journey of Apollo 11 and its crew with newly released cockpit audioAttributioniPlayerWhat holds us back from exercising as we age?James Gallagher explores the mental and physical barriers that may stop usAttributionSoundsHow close are we to nuclear Armageddon?The Doomsday Clock is the closest it’s ever been to midnight – Jane Corbin investigatesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Protests descending into mob rule, PM warns police2’Angry families turned up to find me dressed as Willy Wonka’3Curb Your Enthusiasm star Richard Lewis dies aged 764Moon lander pictured on its side with snapped leg5Family’s anger at police as Emma’s killer jailed6McConnell to step down as Senate Republican leader7One dead and two missing after Channel rescue8’I was inundated with incel messages within an hour’9Court denies Trump’s bid to pause $454m penalty10Why South Korean women aren’t having babies

[ad_1] The tentative budget agreement still needs to be voted on by the full House and Senate.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaAlabama IVF ruling divides devout Christians: ‘Fewer children will be born’Published3 hours agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Ian DruceImage caption, Margaret Boyce was days away from her first appointment for IVF when Alabama made its rulingBy Nomia IqbalBBC News in Birmingham, AlabamaWhen Alabama’s Supreme Court defined frozen embryos as children, the shock and confusion was immediate. Major hospitals pulled fertility services and would-be parents scrambled for clarity on what would happen next.The debate over reproductive rights in America has long been driven, in part, by opposition to abortion from Christian groups – but this ruling has divided that movement and ignited debate about the role of theology in US lawmaking.Margaret Boyce is soft-spoken, a private person, and certainly not – in her words – a “crier”.She had been taking fertility drugs for 10 months and was days away from her first appointment for in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) when the justices of Alabama’s top court upended her life.Their ruling, which prompted many fertility clinics to pause their work, has left her turning to the Bible daily for comfort.The 32-year-old and her husband have a young boy but, second time round, she is experiencing unexplained infertility. Building a family has always been the dream.”I’m one of three. I feel like it’s the greatest gift to give your child a sibling,” she said.”The journey to becoming parents is different for every single couple – mentally, emotionally and financially,” she added, welling up.”This ruling has added more unnecessary anxiety to something that is already so hard.”For a devout Christian like Margaret, the ruling – given its consequences for what she sees clearly as a process to create life – is even more difficult to comprehend.”God,” she said, “tells you to go forth and be fruitful and multiply.”What is the ruling and what does it mean for fertility patients?IVF is a difficult and lengthy treatment, involving the fertilisation of a woman’s eggs with sperm in a lab to create a microscopic embryo. The fertilised embryo is then transferred into a woman’s uterus, where it may create a pregnancy – but a successful outcome is not guaranteed.Embryos are often frozen or eventually destroyed as part of IVF, which accounts for around 2% of US pregnancies.The Alabama court ruled that an existing law – wrongful death of a minor – covers not just foetuses in the womb, but embryos held in a lab or storage facility too.It did not explicitly restrict or ban IVF, but it has still created deep uncertainty for clinics and medical workers who handle embryos and fear prosecution. In recent days the office of the state’s attorney general said he had “no intention” of pursuing criminal charges against IVF clinics – but one clinic told the BBC this statement lacked detail and did not quell their fears.While the majority of the justices rooted their ruling in law, Chief Justice Tom Parker also had a higher authority in mind, repeatedly invoking scripture in explaining his decision.The people of Alabama, he wrote in a concurring opinion, had adopted a “theologically-based view of the sanctity of life” in their state constitution.Image source, Supeme Court of AlabamaImage caption, Chief Justice Tom Parker, of the Alabama Supreme CourtDelving into religious sources from classic Christian theologians like St. Thomas Aquinas and also a modern conservative Christian manifesto, he concluded that “even before birth, all human beings have the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory”.Some anti-abortion groups celebrated the explicit use of scripture in Justice Parker’s opinion to justify what for them was a momentous decision. Tony Perkins, president of evangelical activist group the Family Research Council, described it as “a beautiful defence of life”.But the chief justice’s theocratic justification has left Margaret puzzled. She doesn’t believe in abortion but she also struggles to see a frozen embryo as a living person. For her, life begins with a heartbeat.”Nobody understands more that an embryo is not a child,” she said, before taking a pause, “than the person yearning for that embryo to be a child.”US courts do sometimes make decisions that seem to be based on religious premises, said Meredith Render, a professor at the University of Alabama School of Law.But, she added, “rarely do you see it as explicitly stated” as in the chief justice’s opinion.Alabama IVF row an election-year political bombshellTrump calls on Alabama to protect IVF treatment The ruling was however “not an outlier” for a conservative court in a red state, said Kelly Baden, the vice president for public policy at the Guttmacher Institute, which tracks abortion legislation across the US. “We do see that many elected officials and judges alike are often coming at this debate from a highly religious lens,” she said.While the Alabama state Supreme Court is not appointed by the US president, more than 200 judges were appointed by Donald Trump to federal courts during his four-year term, winning him lasting support from American evangelicals.During his presidency he was able to nominate three new justices to the nine-member Supreme Court – all of whom sided with the majority in striking down the 1973 Roe v Wade decision that had guaranteed a federal right to abortion.Since that decision in 2022 re-opened a national battle over reproductive rights, courts in Missouri have quoted Biblical teachings to justify restricting abortion rights and a Trump-appointed judge in Texas who previously worked for a Christian legal organisation tried to impose a nationwide ban on Mifepristone, a commonly used abortion pill.While many Republican politicians comfortably agree with such rulings, restrictions on abortion imposed by conservative courts have proved a potent campaign issue for Democrats in recent elections, including the 2022 midterms. Image source, ReutersImage caption, Donald Trump has said he supports the availability of IVF treatment, calling on Alabama to find “an immediate solution”The Alabama decision, made by Republican judges and affecting fertility treatments widely supported by the US public, went one step further, prompting immediate fear of a political backlash in a presidential election year. Any sign of IVF being endangered could worsen the anger that’s already cost Republicans since the fall of Roe v Wade, especially among suburban women and those who are uncomfortable with abortion bans.Donald Trump himself, the clear frontrunner in the Republican nomination race, came out strongly in support of IVF, calling on Alabama lawmakers to preserve access to the treatment. His last remaining rival Nikki Haley at first appeared to support the ruling, but then backtracked.Alabama IVF ruling a political gift for Democrats, headache for Republicans”It’s a win philosophically for the pro-life movement because it carries on the pro-life recognition of unborn life,” said Eric Johnston, president of the Alabama Pro-Life Coalition. “But you get into a very difficult situation, where you have this medical procedure that’s accepted by most people, and then how do you deal with it? That’s the dilemma.”I agree with the opinion overall – I think it’s well written opinion from the legal side and from the medical side,” he added. “But I think the pro-life community in general supports IVF, and I’ve known and worked with many people who have had children via IVF. And at the same time, they think abortion is wrong. This issue is so different from abortion, but it has to do with life.”What next for fertility patients in Alabama and beyond?For patients in the deep-south state, the last week has been one of panicked phone calls to clinics, emails to local lawmakers and a rush by some to try and transfer frozen embryos out of the state.Rodney Miller, 46, and his wife Mary Leah, 41, spent a decade trying to have children, before IVF allowed them to give birth to a set of twins 18 months ago, who were adopted as frozen embryos.He said he “thanks the Lord for the advances in science and medicine” that made that possible.Image source, Ian DruceImage caption, Rodney Miller warned the ruling could mean fewer children are bornThe couple are now going through the process again, and waiting to see if two embryos transplanted this week will develop into a pregnancy.”This is not a win [for the Christian right],” says Rodney, who works for Carrywell, an organisation that supports families through infertility.”It’s the classic case of you won the battle but lost the war. Fewer children will be born because of this unless things change.”How did we become a state where if you want to terminate a pregnancy, you have to leave the state and if you want to initiate a pregnancy, via IVF you [also] have to leave the state?”Whether the ruling in Alabama influences decisions elsewhere is an open question. Foetal personhood bills, which enshrine the idea that life begins at conception, have been introduced in more than a dozen states. But these bills, while pushing the idea that a foetus or embryo is a person, don’t explicitly relate that to the context of IVF, said Kelly Baden of the Guttmacher Institute.The Alabama ruling – with its implications that go far beyond abortion access – does not therefore constitute a trend, she said.Alabama family lawyer Ashleigh Meyer Dunham, who has used IVF herself, has been working with a large number of cases affected by the ruling. She said she was “terrified” that fertility patients in other states could eventually be affected.Image source, Ian DruceImage caption, Ashleigh Meyer Dunham is worried that more states might make similar rulings”I think the biggest concerns are that people elsewhere forget about us and they think, ‘Oh they’re just the conservative state, and they’re all country bumpkins. Don’t worry it will never happen here.'”And the next thing you know, it is happening in other states that are ultra-conservative.”Because the Alabama ruling involves an interpretation of state, not federal law, it is unlikely to reach the US Supreme Court. Currently a bill is going through the state house in Alabama, introduced by Democrats, which would aim to effectively pause the ruling and allow treatments to resume as before. Republicans are expected to propose their own bill. If they do, they have to find a way to balance a divided religious constituency, with some celebrating the court’s ruling and others disturbed by its potential implications for IVF.Margaret is praying that lawmakers find a solution.”I’m not very outspoken, I keep myself to myself. But if any of my friends or family heard that I was sending emails to every single representative and senator, I think they would be shocked.”She takes a breath.”But this has got me fired up. It is all I can think about now.”Alex Lederman contributed reporting from Alabama. Additional research from Kayla Epstein in New York.Related TopicsIVFAlabamaUnited StatesMore on this storyAlabama clinics pause IVF treatments over court rulingPublished3 days agoWhat does Alabama ruling mean for fertility patients?Published3 days agoTrump calls on Alabama to protect IVF treatmentPublished1 day agoAlabama IVF row an election-year political bombshellPublished2 days agoTop StoriesDeputy PM declines to say whether MP’s remarks were IslamophobicPublished5 hours agoZelensky says 31,000 troops killed in war in UkrainePublished4 hours ago’Fewer children will be born’: Alabama embryo ruling divides devout ChristiansPublished3 hours agoFeaturesThe converted landmark buildings given new lifeIn pictures: Celebrating the Lantern FestivalDissent is dangerous in Putin’s Russia, but activists refuse to give upThe winners and nominees at the SAG AwardsKim Petras on sexual liberation and fighting TikTokInside the long-abandoned tunnel beneath the ClydeHow a £525 bet gave birth to your morning commuteThe man who tried to eat every animal on Earth. VideoThe man who tried to eat every animal on EarthAfter 1,250 years women join Japan’s (nearly) naked festivalElsewhere on the BBCFancy a film tonight?There’s something for everyone on BBC iPlayerAttributioniPlayerHair-pulling, wrestling and kicking!Watch the moment a violent brawl unfolded in the Maldives ParliamentAttributioniPlayerHow close are we to nuclear Armageddon?The Doomsday Clock is the closest it’s ever been to midnight – Jane Corbin investigatesAttributioniPlayerHow are jelly beans made?Gregg Wallace visits a Dublin factory that makes over ten million of the sweets per day!AttributioniPlayerMost Read1Saltburn TikToker says trespassers are ‘a shame’2’Fewer children will be born’: Alabama embryo ruling divides devout Christians3The converted landmark buildings given new life4At least 15 dead in Burkina Faso church attack5Zelensky says 31,000 troops killed in war in Ukraine6Body of boy found after lake search7Post Office hires ex-police to check its investigators8Dowden declines to say whether MP’s remarks Islamophobic9Inside the long-abandoned tunnel beneath the Clyde10Israel mulls ceasefire plan as progress reported

[ad_1] After Alabama rules that frozen embryos are children, some fertility patients pray that lawmakers find a solution.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaCharles Littlejohn: Man who leaked Trump’s tax returns sentenced to five yearsPublished25 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesA former US tax worker has been sentenced to five years in prison over the unauthorised leak of Donald Trump’s personal tax records to media outlets.Charles Littlejohn, 38, must also spend three years under supervised release and pay a $5,000 fine for his actions.Littlejohn stole tax data from thousands of wealthy Americans while working as a contractor for the US-wide Internal Revenue Service.It was “an attack on our constitutional democracy”, a judge said on Monday.Related TopicsTaxDonald TrumpUnited StatesTop StoriesKing leaves hospital with Camilla hours after Kate is dischargedPublished1 hour agoLive. ‘Little to no warning’ for US troops killed in attack on sleeping quartersDisposable vapes to be banned over fears for children’s healthPublished1 hour agoFeaturesDeath in the Channel – what led a boy to make fatal journey?’Toy poodles’ on the Moon: Japan lander gets to workHas great white shark newborn been caught on film?Train strikes: All you need to knowHow dangerous is vaping and what is the disposable vape ban?‘Luton is officially cool’ after Big Weekend revealElection poll tracker: How do the parties compare?Key UN Gaza aid agency runs into diplomatic storm’We drove home with empty baby seat’ – NHS trust accused of avoidable infant deaths Elsewhere on the BBCHow did Britain lead the world into the jet age?An unlikely story of outstanding aviation achievement at a time of national austerityAttributioniPlayerTracing the historical origins of British comedy tropesIan Hislop’s on the hunt for the earliest examples of enduring British jokesAttributionSounds’I never tried to be famous…it was accidental’Michael Parkinson with guests Ricky Gervais, Michael Palin and Kate AdieAttributioniPlayer’Comedy saved my life’First broadcast in 2010, hear Frank Skinner’s desert island picks and personal revelationsAttributionSoundsMost Read1Laurence Fox loses libel case over social media row2Minister quit as he ‘couldn’t afford mortgage’3King leaves hospital as Kate recovers at home4Spears appears to apologise to Timberlake over book5’Ratatouille restaurant’ loses £1.3m-worth of wine6Has great white shark newborn been caught on film?7Apple says UK could ‘secretly veto’ privacy tools8Met officer guilty of assaulting crime victim9Russian skater Valieva given four-year ban for dopingAttributionSport10Disposable vapes to be banned for child health

[ad_1] Charles Littlejohn stole the tax data of the former president and thousands of wealthy Americans.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC SportMenuHomeFootballCricketFormula 1Rugby URugby LTennisGolfBoxingAthleticsMoreA-Z SportsAmerican FootballAthleticsBasketballBoxingCricketCyclingDartsDisability SportFootballFormula 1Gaelic GamesGet InspiredGolfGymnasticsHorse RacingMixed Martial ArtsMotorsportNetballOlympic SportsRugby LeagueRugby UnionSnookerSwimmingTennisWinter SportsFull Sports A-ZMore from SportEnglandScotlandWalesNorthern IrelandMy SportMatch of the DaySports Personality5 Live SportSport on the BBCNews FeedsHelp & FAQsWinter SportsKamila Valieva: Russian figure skater given four-year ban for dopingPublished6 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Valieva won team gold at the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics aged 15By Michael ShortBBC SportRussian figure skater Kamila Valieva has been given a four-year ban for doping after initially being cleared.A Russian Anti-Doping Agency (Rusada) investigation found the teenager bore “no fault or negligence” for a failed test before the 2022 Winter Olympics.But the Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) has upheld an appeal by the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada).News of Valieva’s failed test only emerged after she had helped Russia to team gold in Beijing at the age of 15.The ban has been back dated to 25 December 2021 and the Cas panel has also ordered “the disqualification all competitive results achieved” from that date.However, it said the power to strip Russia of the gold medal was “not within the scope of this arbitration procedure and will have to be examined by the sports organisations concerned”.Cas said Valieva, who is now aged 17, did not contest the presence of a banned substance and it was asked to decide what sanctions, if any, she should face.”Ms Valieva was not able to establish, on the balance of probabilities and on the basis of the evidence before the panel, that she had not committed the Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) intentionally,” it said in its ruling.It added it had no bearing “whether the athlete is an adult or a Protected Person” referring to Valieva’s age at the time of the failed test.What happened to Valieva?Image source, ReutersImage caption, Valieva became the first woman to land a quadruple jump at a Winter OlympicsValieva tested positive for banned heart medication trimetazidine in December 2021.She had become an instant global star as the first female skater to land a quadruple jump at a Winter Olympics.Russia won gold in the team figure skating event on 7 February 2022, but it was announced four days later that Valieva had failed a drugs test before the Games.The sample had been collected on 25 December at the Russian Figure Skating Championships in St Petersburg.Valieva received a provisional ban but that was lifted by a court and she was allowed to compete in the women’s singles event. However, her performance featured a number of falls and stumbles and she left the ice in tears.A Rusada investigation then cleared her of intentionally doping, but Wada appealed against that finding at Cas, sport’s highest court.Wada and the International Skating Union (ISU) said they were “concerned” by the decision and sought a four-year ban, and for all her results from the date of the sample collection on 25 December 2021 to be expunged.The ISU also called on Cas to determine the final results of the team gold event in Beijing. Though Cas says that duty will now fall elsewhere, the United States, who finished in the silver medal position, are set to be awarded gold, with Japan elevated to silver and Canada receiving bronze following their fourth-place finish two years ago.The ISU subsequently raised the minimum age for competitors in senior events from 15 to 17 to protect skaters’ “physical and mental health, and emotional well-being”.’The doping of children is unforgivable’ – WadaWada said it welcomed the decision, saying it had appealed against the earlier decision “in the interests of fairness for athletes and clean sport – and we believe that has been delivered through this decision”.Valieva’s team have always insisted the failed test was the result of contaminated cutlery which had been tainted by her grandfather’s heart medication.But Wada went on to say those behind the failed tests should face justice. “The doping of children is unforgivable,” it said.”Doctors, coaches or other support personnel who are found to have provided performance-enhancing substances to minors should face the full force of the World Anti-Doping Code. Indeed, Wada encourages governments to consider passing legislation – as some have done already – making the doping of minors a criminal offence.”Latest chapter in Russia’s doping shameRussian athletes were only allowed to compete at the Beijing Games under the neutral name of the Russian Olympic Committee (ROC).That was after Wada banned Russia from all international sport for four years from 2019 following a doping scandal.Cas later reduced the ban and ruled that Russian athletes could compete at the Olympics and other international events but the team could not use the Russian name, flag, or anthem.A Wada investigation in 2016 found Russia operated a state-sponsored doping programme for four years across the “vast majority” of summer and winter Olympic sports.Last month the International Olympic Committee announced it would allow Russian athletes to compete as neutrals at the 2024 Summer Olympic Games in Paris – though that followed a ban on Russian competitors following the invasion of Ukraine.Catching luxury watch thieves: Metropolitan Police officers go undercover and it’s all captured on cameraA deadpan super sleuth and mind-bending mysteries: Comedy and conundrums starring Alan DaviesRelated TopicsWinter SportsFigure SkatingTop StoriesLive. Manager news conferences and transfers latestRussian skater Valieva given four-year ban for dopingPublished6 minutes agoLinks to Barcelona are ‘totally untrue’ – ArtetaPublished55 minutes agoElsewhere on the BBCThe truth behind the fake grooming scandalFeaturing unseen police footage and interviews with the officers at the heart of the caseAttributioniPlayerDid their father and uncle kill Nazi war criminals?A real-life murder mystery following three brothers in their quest for the truthAttributioniPlayer’A city driven skywards by trade and money’Uncover the hidden systems and armies of people running Hong KongAttributioniPlayerThe shocking story of fake DNA paternity testsJust how quick, cheap and easy is it to obtain fabricated documentation?AttributioniPlayerElsewhere in Sport’A man in demand – but Alonso to Liverpool is no done deal”Hyderabad Heist shows England are unmissable’San Francisco 49ers stage thrilling fightback to reach Super Bowl. VideoSan Francisco 49ers stage thrilling fightback to reach Super BowlChiefs beat Ravens to reach fourth Super Bowl in five years. VideoChiefs beat Ravens to reach fourth Super Bowl in five years’They were rattled, I was dreaming’ – when Newport scared Man UtdPope’s 196 ‘one of the great Test innings’ – AgnewSinner ‘dances in pressure storm’ to win first majorNeto scores brilliant solo goal as Wolves beat West Brom in derby. VideoNeto scores brilliant solo goal as Wolves beat West Brom in derbyMartins gives Watford lead with ‘cheeky’ free-kick. VideoMartins gives Watford lead with ‘cheeky’ free-kickMaidstone stun Ipswich to reach FA Cup fifth round. VideoMaidstone stun Ipswich to reach FA Cup fifth roundJames scores twice as Chelsea beat Brighton 3-0. VideoJames scores twice as Chelsea beat Brighton 3-0’A brilliant heart-on-sleeve boss who has taken Reds on thrill ride”Frozen eyes, frozen toes’ – the brutal race that may never returnPick your England XV for the Six Nations

[ad_1] Valieva tested positive for banned heart medication trimetazidine in December 2021. She had become an instant global star as the first female skater to land a quadruple jump at…

Other Story

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaCould you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New YorkersThis video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Could you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New YorkersCloseJury selection is under way in Donald Trump’s New York City hush-money trial, with hundreds of people selected as potential jurors.They must answer a questionnaire to determine, among other things, if they can be impartial about the former president.The BBC asked some of those questions to Manhattan residents.SubsectionUS & CanadaPublished50 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRead descriptionExplore moreCould you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New Yorkers. Video, 00:02:16Could you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New YorkersSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished50 minutes ago2:16Up Next. A view from inside court for Trump’s blockbuster trial. Video, 00:01:15A view from inside court for Trump’s blockbuster trialSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished19 hours agoUp Next1:15Press, police and protesters: Outside Trump courthouse. Video, 00:01:12Press, police and protesters: Outside Trump courthouseSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished1 day ago1:12Trump’s ‘perp walk’ moment explained in 60 seconds. Video, 00:01:00Trump’s ‘perp walk’ moment explained in 60 secondsSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished31 March 20231:00Editor’s recommendationsCopenhagen stock exchange engulfed by huge fire. Video, 00:01:03Copenhagen stock exchange engulfed by huge fireSubsectionEuropePublished12 hours ago1:03Moment spire collapses at Copenhagen stock exchange. Video, 00:00:43Moment spire collapses at Copenhagen stock exchangeSubsectionEuropePublished11 hours ago0:43Dormice ladders built in the Forest of Dean. Video, 00:00:51Dormice ladders built in the Forest of DeanSubsectionGloucestershirePublished1 day ago0:51Liz Truss: The world was safer under Trump. Video, 00:00:35Liz Truss: The world was safer under TrumpSubsectionUK PoliticsPublished22 hours ago0:35Huge fires blaze along Miami highway. Video, 00:00:33Huge fires blaze along Miami highwaySubsectionUS & CanadaPublished12 hours ago0:33Watch: Georgia opposition leader punches MP during debate. Video, 00:00:34Watch: Georgia opposition leader punches MP during debateSubsectionEuropePublished21 hours ago0:34Wheelie bins fly and a caravan overturns in strong wind. Video, 00:00:24Wheelie bins fly and a caravan overturns in strong windSubsectionStoke & StaffordshirePublished1 day ago0:24Hannah Waddingham calls out demanding paparazzi. Video, 00:00:28Hannah Waddingham calls out demanding paparazziSubsectionEntertainment & ArtsPublished1 day ago0:28Endangered California condor chicks hatched in LA. Video, 00:01:28Endangered California condor chicks hatched in LASubsectionUS & CanadaPublished1 day ago1:28

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityUKEnglandN. IrelandScotlandAlbaWalesCymruIsle of ManGuernseyJerseyLocal NewsFirst product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealedPublished11 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, ReutersImage caption, Meghan pictured at a polo match in Florida last weekBy Sean CoughlanRoyal correspondentA first glimpse of the new business venture from the Duchess of Sussex has been teased on social media, with pictures of a jar of strawberry jam.In a bid to preserve a sense of mystery, the jam from the new American Riviera Orchard brand seemed to be spread among friends and influencers.Fashion designer Tracy Robbins posted a picture of the jam on Instagram.It was numbered “17 of 50”, suggesting the number of recipients of this first fruit of the new business.The arrival of Meghan’s new California-based lifestyle brand had been signalled on social media last month and this suggests that it will be selling food products.What do we know about Meghan’s new brand?Five things about Harry and Meghan’s brand revampWhy did Harry and Meghan leave the Royal Family?There seemed to be have been something of a re-launch for Meghan and husband Prince Harry’s brands and businesses this year, beginning with the overhaul of their regal-looking website under the sussex.com label.Their latest projects seem to be moving away from a previous focus on their time as working royals, such as their Netflix film Harry and Meghan and Prince Harry’s memoir Spare.The hint about the strawberry jam from Meghan’s American Riviera Orchard brand seems to fit with the couple’s latest Netflix plans.Meghan is going to launch a Netflix show which will “celebrate the joys of cooking and gardening, entertaining, and friendship”.Prince Harry will be involved in another Netflix venture showing the inside track on the world of polo. That’s the equestrian sport, not the mints.Delfina Blaquier, married to Prince Harry’s polo-playing friend Nacho Figueras, also posted a picture of the new jam, with hers labelled “10 of 50”.The social media trail for American Riviera Orchard evokes a sense of the couple’s home in California – and this soft launch for the jam show pictures of the jars in a sunny basket of lemons.It’s not known how much items from the new lifestyle brand will cost. Although there are already plenty of other royals getting into jams. Visitors to the gift shops in royal palaces can get a Buckingham Palace Strawberry Preserve for £3.95 or Windsor Castle Fine Cut Seville Orange Marmalade, also for £3.95.On both sides of the Atlantic they seem to be conserving their finances.Related TopicsUK Royal FamilyMeghan, Duchess of SussexMore on this storyWhat we know about Meghan’s regal lifestyle brandPublished16 MarchMeghan launches surprise new lifestyle brandPublished14 MarchTop StoriesMPs back smoking ban for those born after 2009Published8 minutes agoMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished2 hours agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished7 hours agoFeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlinePlaying Coachella after cancer emotional, says DJHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Nursery boss ‘killed baby she strapped to beanbag’2Birmingham Airport flights disrupted by incident3Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge4First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed5MPs back smoking ban for those born after 20096Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference7Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames8Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline9Marten a ‘lioness’ who ‘loved her cubs’, court told10Sons of McCartney and Lennon release joint single

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaSupreme Court hears 6 Jan case that may hit Trump trialPublished2 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsUS Capitol riotsImage source, Brent StirtonImage caption, Hundreds of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol after holding a “Stop the Steal” rally on 6 January, 2021By Nadine YousifBBC NewsThe US Supreme Court have begun hearing a case that could undo charges for those who stormed the Capitol in 2021. It focuses on whether a 2002 federal law created to prevent corporate misconduct could apply to individuals involved in the 6 January riots. More than 350 people have been charged in the incident under that law, which carries a 20-year prison penalty.Donald Trump faces the same charge in the pending federal case accusing him of election interference. The law makes it a crime to “corruptly” obstruct or impede an official proceeding. On Tuesday, Supreme Court Justices heard two hours of arguments over the law’s interpretation. However, it remained unclear how they would rule. A lawyer for a man who stormed the Capitol and was prosecuted under the law argued before the Justices that “a host of felony and misdemeanour” crimes already exist to prosecute his clients actions.The 2002 law passed in the wake of the Enron accounting scandal, Jeffrey Green said, was not one of them. US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar counterargued that rioters deliberately attempted “to prevent Congress from certifying the results of the election,” therefore obstructing an official proceeding. Both fielded sceptical questions from the Justices. At one point, Mr Green argued that there is no historical precedent in which the law was used to prosecute demonstrators.Justice Sonia Sotomayor replied: “We’ve never had a situation before where (there was an attempt) to stop a proceeding violently, so I am not sure what a lack of history proves.”On the other hand, Ms Prelogar fielded questions from Justice Neil Gorusch on whether the law could then be stretched to apply to a “sit-in that disrupts a trial” or “a heckler” at the State of the Union Address. “Would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify for 20 years in federal prison?” he asked, appearing to reference an incident in which Jamaal Bowman, Democrat House representative, pressed a fire alarm in the Capitol.How the top court rules could have wide-ranging effects on the hundreds of people charged, convicted or sentenced under the law, as well as the prosecution of Mr Trump. Here is a breakdown of the key players and the law being argued: What is the 2002 federal law at the centre of the trial?The law is called the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. It was passed in response to the Enron scandal in the early 2000s, after it was exposed that those involved had engaged in massive fraud and shredding documents. It criminalizes the destruction of evidence – like records or documents. But it also penalises anyone who “otherwise obstructs, influences or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so.” How has it been used in response to the 6 January riots?Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) has brought obstruction charges against those who participated in the storming of the Capitol. Federal prosecutors argue they did so to impede Congress’ certification of the presidential electoral vote count to cement Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election. Therefore, the latter portion of the law that deals with obstructing an “official proceeding” would apply, the DoJ says. Who is challenging the law’s use in this case, and why? The Supreme Court is hearing a challenge to the law’s application brought forward by a former Pennsylvania police officer.Joseph Fischer was charged under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act with obstruction of a congressional proceeding on 6 January, as well as assaulting a police officer and disorderly conduct. His lawyers argue that prosecutors overreached with applying the Act, which they say deals explicitly with destroying or tampering with evidence integral to an investigation. Those who challenge the law’s application in 6 January cases also argue that a broad interpretation of the law would allow the prosecution of lobbyists or protestors who disrupt matters in Congress.How could the Supreme Court ruling impact Trump?The former president is charged under the very same law in a federal case accusing him of working to overturn the results of the 2020 election, which he lost to Mr Biden.If Supreme Court justices rule that the law does not apply to the 6 January rioters, Mr Trump could seek dismissal of half the charges he faces in that case.It also could be seen as a political win for the former president, who is seeking re-election in November, as he repeatedly has accused prosecutors of overreach. A final ruling is not expected until June. Related TopicsUS Capitol riotsDonald TrumpMore on this storySupreme Court to hear appeal over Capitol riot chargePublished13 December 2023A very simple guide to Trump’s indictmentsPublished25 August 2023Supreme Court asked to rule on Trump’s immunityPublished12 December 2023Top StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished1 hour agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished5 hours agoNo liberty in addiction, says health secretary on smoking banPublished4 minutes agoFeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2Birmingham Airport suspends flights over incident3First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed4Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference5Marten a ‘lioness’ who ‘loved her cubs’, court told6Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline7Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames8No liberty in addiction, says minister on smoking ban9Sons of McCartney and Lennon release joint single10Boy, 4, dies after fire at family home in Wigan

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaNational Conservatism Conference: Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels eventPublished4 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, ReutersImage caption, Nigel Farage said the decision to shut the conference down was as an attempt to stifle free speechBy Nick Beake in Brussels and Laura GozziBBC NewsBrussels police have been ordered to shut down a conference attended by right-wing politicians across Europe, including Nigel Farage and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.Organisers say the National Conservatism Conference in the Belgian capital is continuing, but guests are no longer allowed to enter. Local authorities had raised concerns over public safety.A UK spokeswoman called reports of police action “extremely disturbing”. She said that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was a “strong supporter and advocator for free speech” and that he was “very clear that cancelling events or preventing attendance and no-platforming speakers is damaging to free speech and to democracy as a result”.Alexander De Croo, the Belgian prime minister, said that the shutting down of the conference was “unacceptable”.Referring to the fact that it was the local mayor, Emir Kir, who opposed the conference, Mr De Croo added that while municipal autonomy was a cornerstone of Belgium’s democracy it could “never overrule the Belgian constitution guaranteeing the freedom of speech”. “Banning political meetings is unconstitutional. Full stop,” Mr De Croo wrote on X.In a message to organisers, Mr Kir had said some of the attendees of Tuesday’s conference held anti-gay and anti-abortion views. “Among these personalities there are several particularly from the right-conservative, religious right and European extreme right,” his statement said.Mr Kir also wrote on X: “The far right is not welcome.”Nigel Farage, who took to the stage this morning, told the BBC the decision to close down the conference because there were homophobes in the audience was “cobblers”, and that he condemned the decision as an attempt to stifle free speech. “Thank God For Brexit”, he said.Organised by a think-tank called the Edmund Burke Foundation, the National Conservatism Conference is a global movement which espouses what it describes as traditional values, which it claims are being “undermined and overthrown”. It also opposes further European integration.The conference said it aimed to bring together “public figures, journalists, scholars and students” who understood the connection between conservatism and the idea of nationhood and national traditions. French far-right politician Eric Zemmour, arriving for the conference after police had blocked the entrance, told journalists that Mr Kir was “using the police as a private militia to prevent… Europeans from taking part freely”.Organisers said Mr Zemmour was not allowed into the venue and that his address would be postponed.Former UK Home Secretary Suella Braverman and far-right French politician Eric Zemmour were listed as keynote speakers. The National Conservatism Conference reportedly started around 08:00 (06:00 GMT) on Tuesday and carried on for three hours until police showed up and asked the organisers to make attendees leave.Later, organisers wrote on X: “The police are not letting anyone in. People can leave, but they cannot return. Delegates have limited access to food and water, which are being prevented from delivery. Is this what city mayor Emir Kir is aiming for?”Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban and the former Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki were due to speak tomorrow. Earlier, the organisers said on X that they would challenge the order to shut the conference down. “The police entered the venue on our invitation, saw the proceedings and the press corps, and quickly withdrew. Is it possible they witnessed how peaceful the event is?,” they wrote on X.The Claridge event space – located near Brussels’s European Quarter – can host up to 850 people. Around 250 people were in attendance on Tuesday afternoon.Mohamed Nemri, the owner of Claridge, told the BBC he had decided to host the event because “we don’t reject any party…. even if we don’t have the same opinion. That’s normal”.”I am Muslim and people have different opinion and that’s it. We are living in a freedom country. I’d like to people to talk freely,” he added.It is the third venue that was supposed to hold the event, after the previous two fell through. Belgian media reported that one venue pulled out after pressure by a group called the “Antifascist coordination of Belgium”.Related TopicsBelgiumTop StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished43 minutes agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished5 hours agoLive. US expects to impose further sanctions on Iran ‘in the coming days’FeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed3Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference4Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline5Superdry boss hits back at ‘not cool’ criticism6Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames7MPs to vote on smoking ban for those born after 20098Stabbed TV presenter ‘feeling much better’9Sons of McCartney and Lennon release joint single10Baby hurt in Sydney stabbing out of intensive care

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaNasa says part of International Space Station crashed into Florida homePublished40 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, NASAImage caption, The recovered object was part of a stanchion used to mount batteries to a cargo palletBy Max MatzaBBC NewsUS space agency Nasa confirmed that an object that crashed into a home in Florida earlier this month was part of the International Space Station (ISS). The metal object was jettisoned from the orbiting outpost in March 2021, Nasa said on Monday after analysing the sample at the Kennedy Space Center.The 1.6lb (0.7kg) metal object tore through two layers of ceiling after re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. Homeowner Alejandro Otero said his son was nearly injured by the impact. Nasa said the object was part of some 5,800lbs of hardware that was dumped by the station after it had new lithium-ion batteries installed. “The hardware was expected to fully burn up during entry through Earth’s atmosphere on March 8, 2024. However, a piece of hardware survived and impacted a home in Naples, Florida,” the agency said.The debris was determined to be part of a stanchion used to mount batteries on a cargo pallet. The object, made from metal alloy Inconel, has dimensions of 4in by 1.6in (10.1cm by 4cm).Mr Otero told CBS affiliate Wink-TV that the device created a “tremendous sound” as it blasted into his home.”It almost hit my son. He was two rooms over and heard it all,” he said.”I was shaking. I was completely in disbelief. What are the chances of something landing on my house with such force to cause so much damage,” Mr Otero continued.”I’m super grateful that nobody got hurt.”According to Nasa, the ISS will “perform a detailed investigation” on how the debris survived burn-up.What’s the risk of being hit by falling space debris?Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No it’s more space junkSpace junk has been a growing a problem. Earlier this month, sky watchers in California watched mysterious golden streaks moving through the night sky.US officials later determined that the light show was caused by burning debris from a Chinese rocket re-entering earth’s orbit.In February, a Chinese satellite known as “Object K” burned up as it re-entered the atmosphere over Hawaii.Last year, a barnacle-covered giant metal dome found on a Western Australian beach was identified as a component of an Indian rocket. There are plans to display it alongside chunks of Nasa’s Skylab, which crashed in Australia in 1979. This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Object thought to be a satellite burns up on re-entering Earth’s atmosphereRelated TopicsSpace debrisNasaFloridaUnited StatesMore on this storyIs it a bird? Is it a plane? No it’s more space junkPublished3 AprilRobot dog trains to walk on Moon in Oregon trialsPublished3 days agoTop StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished50 minutes agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished4 hours agoLive. US expects to impose further sanctions on Iran ‘in the coming days’FeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed3Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference4Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline5Superdry boss hits back at ‘not cool’ criticism6Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames7MPs to vote on smoking ban for those born after 20098Stabbed TV presenter ‘feeling much better’9Baby hurt in Sydney stabbing out of intensive care10Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice forever

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaFormer Marine jailed for nine years for bombing abortion clinicPublished7 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsUS abortion debateImage source, CBSBy Max MatzaBBC NewsA former US Marine has been jailed for nine years for firebombing a California Planned Parenthood clinic and plotting other attacks to spark a “race war”.Chance Brannon, 24, pleaded guilty to the March 2022 attack on the healthcare clinic, which provides abortions in some of its locations.He also plotted to attack Jewish people and an LGBT pride event taking place at Dodger Stadium in Los Angeles. At the time of his arrest, he was an active duty member of the US Marines. Prosecutors said Brannon was a neo-Nazi who frequently spoke of “cleansing” the US of “particular ethnic groups”. In November, Brannon pleaded guilty to conspiracy, destruction of property, possession of an explosive and intentionally damaging a reproductive health services facility.Kristen Clarke, the assistant attorney general for the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, said the attack “was designed to terrorise patients seeking reproductive healthcare and the people who provide it”.The explosion damaged the front entrance to the clinic in Costa Mesa, Orange County. No one was injured.However, Mehtab Syed, of the FBI’s Los Angeles field office, said Brannon’s “deep-rooted hatred and extremist views… could have killed innocent people”. Mr Syed added that Brannon plotted to rob Jewish residents in the Hollywood Hills, and had also discussed plans to attack the power grid. Further to this, in 2022, Mr Syed said Brannon, of San Juan Capistrano, placed calls to two US “adversaries” hoping to offer himself as a “mole” providing US intelligence.Two co-defendants, Tibet Ergul and Xavier Batten, have pleaded guilty to similar charges and will be sentenced next month.According to the National Abortion Federation, a group representing US abortion providers, there was a “sharp increase” in violence against clinics in 2022. Related TopicsAbortionUS abortion debateUnited StatesCaliforniaMore on this storyWhat is Planned Parenthood?Published25 September 2015Top StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished53 minutes agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished3 hours agoLive. Israel demands sanctions on Iranian missile projectFeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference3Superdry boss hits back at ‘not cool’ criticism4First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed5Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline6Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames7MPs to vote on smoking ban for those born after 20098Stabbed TV presenter ‘feeling much better’9William to return to duties after Kate diagnosis10Baby hurt in Sydney stabbing out of intensive care