BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaDonald Trump backs Mike Johnson after Mar-a-Lago meetingPublished40 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Hard-line Republicans like Marjorie Taylor Greene have accused Mr Johnson of pandering to DemocratsBy Anthony Zurcher in Washington and Nadine YousifBBC NewsRepublican Speaker of the House Mike Johnson said he would push for legislation that would require voters to prove they are US citizens after meeting Donald Trump on Friday.It was their first public meeting since Mr Johnson became speaker in November.It comes as some members of Mr Johnson’s party are calling for him to be removed from his leadership post.But the former president says he believes the speaker is doing a “very good job”.House Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene filed a motion to remove Mr Johnson three weeks ago. Ms Greene accused the speaker of aligning with Democrats on the issue of Ukraine aid.”We’re getting along very well with the speaker and I get along very well with Marjorie,” Mr Trump said after the meeting at his Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida. “It’s not an easy situation for any speaker, I think he’s doing a very good job and he’s doing about as good as you’re going to do.”Mr Trump began his remarks by attacking President Biden over the issue of immigration, which Mr Johnson linked to the declared subject of the meeting, “election integrity”. Mr Trump has continued to attribute his 2020 presidential defeat to ballot fraud, but he has provided no evidence to substantiate his claims, which have been rejected by courts and elections officials from both parties.At the news conference Friday, Mr Johnson said he would push forward with a bill that would require voters to prove that they are US citizens and require states to remove non-citizens from voter rolls.The speaker alleged that Democrats “want to turn these people into voters” and suggested, without listing evidence, that immigrants were being pushed to register to vote by local welfare benefit offices. Non-citizens are barred from voting in US federal elections, and studies including from the conservative Heritage Foundation have found that cases of immigrants illegally voting are extremely rare.”We’re going to introduce legislation to require that everyone who registers to vote in an election must prove that they are a US citizen,” Mr Johnson said, although he stopped short of claiming that illegal voting by immigrants was a major ongoing problem. “We cannot wait for widespread fraud to occur,” he said.Who is the Speaker of the House Mike Johnson?The former president’s endorsement came at a politically fraught time for the speaker, who is facing Ms Greene’s efforts to push him out of his job. In a letter written on Tuesday to her Republican colleagues, Ms Greene warned that she will not tolerate Mr Johnson “serving the Democrats and the Biden administration” over his own party “and helping them achieve their policies”. She has accused him of helping Democrats to pass spending legislation, but his recent effort to provide Ukraine more military aid appeared to spark her objection. On 22 March, she filed her motion to remove Mr Johnson, saying that he had “betrayed” Republicans. But she has not yet indicated if or when she plans to force real action on the motion – in the form of a floor vote. Mr Trump and his campaign will want to avoid another chaotic leadership battle among Republicans in the House of Representatives before the US presidential election in November. Polling showed that the fight in October undermined voters’ confidence in the party. Mr Trump derailed the speaker’s effort to renew a provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act earlier this week, but a revised bill passed the House earlier Friday.The law allows agencies to collect foreign intelligence on US soil, if a special court agrees. Mr Trump said he was “not a fan” of the legislation but noted that the bill had been amended to require re-approval in two years. The speaker is also planning to bring a Ukraine military aid bill to a vote next week, months after existing aid funding lapsed.When asked about the issue, Mr Trump said: “We’re looking at it right now, and they’re talking about it, and we’re thinking making it in the form of a form of a loan instead of a gift.”He claimed, as he has repeatedly in the past, that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the current conflict in the Middle East would not have happened if he was still in the White House.Related TopicsRepublican PartyDonald TrumpUS politicsUnited StatesMore on this storyMarjorie Taylor Greene wants Speaker Mike Johnson outPublished22 MarchRepublican leader makes fresh push for Ukraine aidPublished2 AprilThe next US Speaker will inherit a poisoned chalicePublished4 October 2023Top StoriesAngela Rayner: I will step down if I committed criminal offencePublished3 hours ago’Don’t’ – Biden warns Iran against attacking IsraelPublished2 hours agoEx-Post Office boss regrets ‘subbies with their hand in the till’ emailPublished9 hours agoFeaturesHow a North Korean missile researcher became a South Korean MPHow Zendaya perfected ‘method dressing’Suicide is on the rise for young Americans. Why?’I survived the ferry disaster – but lost 17 of my family’Pinstickers’ guide to the Grand National AttributionSportWeekly quiz: How did ‘Hardest Geezer’ celebrate the end of his Africa run?The $2bn dirty-money case that rocked Singapore’I went to kick the ball and my knee collapsed’What happened in the Kingsmills massacre?Elsewhere on the BBCOn the trip of a lifetime, which pair will finish first?Five teams of intrepid Brits battle it out in a breath-taking 15,000 kilometre raceAttributioniPlayerReporting on the OJ Simpson car chaseFormer LA crime reporter, David Goldstein, recalls the most ‘surreal’ day of his careerAttributionSoundsAncient artefacts, power play and exploring epic locationsMary Beard uncovers the hidden world of the Roman emperorsAttributioniPlayerFrom Doctor Who to An Enemy of the PeopleNihal Arthanayake brings you an in-depth interview with actor Matt SmithAttributionSoundsMost Read1Jon Richardson and Lucy Beaumont to divorce2Joe Lycett reveals H from Steps statue hoax3Rayner: I’ll stand down if I’ve broken the law4BBC Russian journalist branded ‘foreign agent’5’Don’t’ – Biden warns Iran against attacking Israel6Doctor Who: Varada Sethu confirmed as new companion7Drug boss ordered to hand over £3.5m8Italian fashion designer Roberto Cavalli dies9’I went to kick the ball and my knee collapsed’10Kingsmills massacre a planned IRA attack – inquest

[ad_1] It comes as the Republican House speaker faces internal dissent and calls for his removal.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaThe Caitlin Clark Effect has made women’s basketball the hottest ticket aroundPublished22 hours agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Caitlin Clark plays for IowaBy Brandon DrenonBBC News, WashingtonThe scene was described as “controlled chaos”.Dozens of people queued down the block and around the corner to get into the Sports Bra in Portland, Oregon, the first bar in the world – according to owner Jenny Nguyen – to only show women’s sports.The fact that it was the middle of a Monday did not curb the crowd’s enthusiasm, nor did it slow them from consuming “three times” as many drinks as they normally would.They were there to witness an epic women’s college basketball tournament game between the Iowa Hawkeyes and LSU Tigers, headlined by superstars Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese.From the Sports Bra crowd to celebrities Lebron James and Travis Scott, more than 12 million viewers tuned in. It was one of the most-watched college basketball games ever, men’s or women’s.”It was electric,” Ms Nguyen said, recalling the atmosphere as the University of Iowa beat Louisiana State University, a victory led by Clark who scored a whopping 41 points.”I’ve been watching women’s basketball for decades. It feels like everyone else is just catching up… it’s about damn time,” she added.The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has been hosting the basketball tournament known as March Madness since 1939.In just three weeks, 68 of the best college teams are winnowed down to one champion.The annual event is a media frenzy where millions of fans watch games around the clock for days on end.For decades, that only applied to the men’s tournament. Not anymore.Caitlin Clark breaks college basketball points recordNBA legend James’ son Bronny to enter 2024 draftTicket prices for the women’s championship this year cost twice as much as the men’s on average, reaching as high as $11,000 (£8,736).One of the reasons for this “watershed moment in women’s basketball”, said Amanda Christovich, a reporter at Front Office Sports, is generational talent like Iowa’s Caitlin Clark.The other, she said, is that the push for gender parity in college sports has reached a new height.In 2024, the NCAA signed a TV contract with ESPN that values the women’s tournament at $65m annually, more than 10 times the previous rate. Less than five years ago, it wasn’t even possible to watch every game of the women’s NCAA tournament on national broadcasts.The bigger stage has given a bigger platform to bigger stars. And Clark – who is arguably the biggest name in the sport right now – has been a main driver of the recent buzz.The college senior has scored over 3,900 points in her career, more than any other college athlete, male or female, in the history of the NCAA.This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Caitlin Clark: The Iowa superstar breaking records on and off the courtWhat is the Caitlin Clark Effect?Caitlin Clark is the 22-year-old headline-grabbing, trash-talking, fan-charming Iowa guard who is considered one of the greatest basketball players in college history.She wins games. Lots of games. Breaks records. Lots of records. And fills stadiums with sell-out crowds eager to see her.Many are hoping to witness her renowned long-distance three-point shots.Standing dozens of feet from the basket, sometimes in the middle of the court, she shoots the ball over the heads of her opponents with ease. The distance often defies the average range of a collegiate female player.Clark recently broke the record for the most three-point shots made in a single season, a record previously held by professional player Steph Curry.Image source, USA TODAY SportsImage caption, Caitlin Clark hits a three pointerHer star power – punctuated by more than one million followers on Instagram – has drawn a multitude of new fans to the sport. People travel thousands of miles and spend thousands of dollars just to see her.The phenomenon of her influence has been dubbed the Caitlin Clark Effect.As with Taylor Swift, her appearances not only drive ticket prices up, but also balloon hotel rates and strain restaurant reservation lists nearby.”She’s a once in a generation player. She’s incredible. She’s viral,” Ms Christovich said. “She’s the conduit by which a lot of people have discovered women’s college basketball this year.”However, Ms Christovich added, “Would Caitlin Clark have garnered the attention she’s getting now 20 years ago? Probably not”.”And that’s not because she wouldn’t have been as good. It’s because people weren’t paying attention,” she said.For decades, the women’s tournament had been “treated like a second-class event”, according to Ms Christovich.One example was that the women’s tournament was not allowed to use the NCAA’s trademarked March Madness logo until the 2022 season. And, until recently, it was also harder to find on TV, Ms Christovich said.Breaking down barriers”The moment upon us is one that has been a snowball building for the last generation or so,” said Kate Fagan, a former Colorado University basketball player, and author of the book Hoop Muses.There were three major turning points, separated by decades.First, in the 1970s the NCAA was forced to provide equitable athletic opportunities to women when the federal law known as Title IX went into effect. Then, in 1996, the creation of the Women’s National Basketball League gave young players a path to becoming professional athletes.The third major catalyst arrived more than 20 years later, on TikTok. In 2021, an Oregon University women’s basketball athlete posted a video that compared a NCAA tournament training facility for women to one provided for men.There were gross disparities. The men’s facility featured rows of workout platforms, outfitted with dumbbells, barbells and weights capable of going into the hundreds of pounds. The women’s facility had a single tower of dumbbells that topped out at 30 pounds (14 kg), and a few yoga mats. The video went viral.A follow-up investigation by an outside law firm found that the NCAA “prioritizes men’s basketball, contributing to gender inequity” and it was “significantly undervaluing women’s basketball as an asset”.The NCAA then carried out a complete overhaul that included allowing the women’s tournament to use the March Madness branding. The new media contract with ESPN, which now airs all of the women’s March Madness games across multiple platforms, was another by-product.”There were always great players. There were always great athletes,” Pamela Grundy, co-author of Shattering the Glass, a novel chronicling women’s basketball, said: “But now a greater group of people are seeing them.”And frankly it’s a lot better than people thought.”But, she noted, “sports is driven not just by tickets, but by sponsors”.Image source, USA TODAY SportsImage caption, New fans are drawn to the sportMillions of dollars paid to college athletesIn 2021 a combination of state laws and NCAA rule changes opened up never-before-seen opportunities for college athletes to make money by selling the rights to their name, image and likeness (NIL).Six-figure endorsement deals, inked by players – some of them still teenagers – soon followed. Top brands like State Farm and Nike began partnering with top athletes like Caitlin Clark.”There are a handful of women athletes that are earning millions of dollars through NIL each year,” said Blake Lawrence, founder and CEO of Opendorse.com, a platform for NIL contracts.National endorsement deals also put athletes in front of more people more often, broadcasting them on TVs across America in commercials and games.And women have an advantage with their social media presence, a “big component” in most NIL deals, Mr Lawrence said.Still, female college basketball players remain held back in many ways by the NCAA structure, Ms Christovich said.In the tournament, men’s basketball teams are able to earn money for their conferences the further they advance through the rounds. The women’s teams are not.For the top four teams that remain in each of the men’s and women’s tournaments this year, that equates to a roughly $40m difference.”What’s incredibly impressive about the women’s tournament success, is that it’s happening despite the barriers,” Ms Christovich said.More on this storyThe million-dollar hustle changing US sportAttributionSportPublished6 September 2023Caitlin Clark breaks college basketball points recordPublished4 MarchCaitlin Clark: The young superstar who will captivate the US this weekend. Video, 00:02:16Caitlin Clark: The young superstar who will captivate the US this weekendAttributionSportPublished1 day ago2:16NBA legend James’ son Bronny to enter 2024 draftAttributionSportPublished1 day agoTop StoriesTel Aviv protests: Thousands demand Netanyahu resign. VideoTel Aviv protests: Thousands demand Netanyahu resignPublished5 minutes agoPM marks six months of Israel-Gaza war as UK sends Navy ship for aidPublished21 minutes agoDozens of UK flights cancelled as Storm Kathleen sweeps inPublished1 hour agoFeaturesSix months on, how close is Israel to eliminating Hamas?’A game of Jenga’: Inside the perilous Baltimore bridge clean-upThe world’s eclipse chasers arrive in North AmericaWhere in the UK can you see Monday’s solar eclipse?Boris Johnson, David Cameron, and the row over arming Israel. AudioBoris Johnson, David Cameron, and the row over arming IsraelAttributionSoundsWhere does Israel get its weapons?New Yorkers mostly unshaken by rare earthquakeKacey Musgraves: ‘The tortured musician cliché is a farce’Prince Andrew’s infamous BBC interview… as dramatised by NetflixElsewhere on the BBCIt’s make or break timeAnother set of eager entrepreneurs hope to impress the fearsome panelAttributioniPlayerBruce Lee as you’ve never seen him beforeTen defining pictures throw a unique lens onto an extraordinary lifeAttributioniPlayerAmbition, money and deceptionThe scandalous true story of Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos, starring Amanda SeyfriedAttributioniPlayerFrom Starman to film star…How did the silver screen inspire David Bowie?AttributioniPlayerMost Read1Actor Cole Brings Plenty found dead in Kansas2Planes clip each other at Heathrow Airport3Dozens of UK flights cancelled as storm sweeps in4Where in the UK can you see Monday’s solar eclipse?5Three-year-old girl rescued after falling into lake6West faces ‘authoritarian’ alliance, says Nato head7Israel military sales ban call shameful – Johnson8Warnings of more flooding in Sydney as dam spills9Myanmar army loses border town in another big defeat10Israel says hostage’s body recovered in night sortie

[ad_1] There were gross disparities. The men’s facility featured rows of workout platforms, outfitted with dumbbells, barbells and weights capable of going into the hundreds of pounds. The women’s facility…

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityAsiaChinaIndiaThailand moves to legalise same-sex marriagePublished1 hour agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesImage caption, The move will cement Thailand’s reputation as a relative haven for LGBTQ+ couplesBy Jonathan Head & Kelly NgIn Bangkok and SingaporeThailand has taken a historic step closer to marriage equality after the lower house passed a bill giving legal recognition to same-sex marriage.It still needs approval from the Senate and royal endorsement to become law.But it is widely expected to happen by the end of 2024, making Thailand the only South East Asian country to recognise same-sex unions.It will cement Thailand’s reputation as a relative haven for LGBTQ+ couples in a region where such attitudes are rare. “This is the beginning of equality. It’s not a universal cure to every problem but it’s the first step towards equality,” Danuphorn Punnakanta, an MP and chairman of the lower house’s committee on marriage equality, told parliament while presenting a draft of the bill. “This law wants to return these rights to this group of people, not grant them the rights.”The new law, which was passed by 400 of 415 of lawmakers present, will describe marriage as a partnership between two individuals, instead of between a man and woman. And it will give LGBTQ+ couples equal rights to get marital tax savings, to inherit property, and to give medical treatment consent for partners who are incapacitated. Under the law, married same-sex couples can also adopt children. However, the lower house did not adopt the committee’s suggestion to use the term “parents” instead of “fathers and mothers”.Thailand already has laws that ban discrimination over gender identity and sexual orientation and is, therefore, seen as one of Asia’s most LGBTQ+ friendly nations. But it has taken many years of campaigning for same-sex couples to come this close to marriage equality. Past attempts to legalise same-sex marriage failed despite broad public support. A government survey late last year showed that 96.6% of those polled were in favour of the bill.Marriage equality eludes Japan’s same-sex couplesThe lesbian activist seeking marriage equality in India”Yes, I’m watching the parliamentary debate and keeping my fingers crossed,” says Phisit Sirihirunchai, a 35-year-old openly gay police officer. “I’m glad and already excited that it is really going to happen. I am coming closer and closer to seeing my dreams come true.”Phisit said he and his partner, who have been together for more than five years, have been planning to get married on the day the law comes into effect.”I feel that equality has happened today. It’s a historic day for the Thai parliament that stands to fight for the rights of LGBTQI+,” said Tunyawaj Kamolwongwat, a gay MP from the opposition Move Forward party who has been campaigning for marriage equality in the past decade.Several political parties promised to recognise same-sex unions as part of their campaign before last year’s election. Prime Minister Sretta Thavisin has also been vocal in his support since taking office in September last year. In December, the lower house passed four proposed bills to recognise same-sex marriage – one was put forward by Mr Thavisin’s administration and three came from opposition parties. These were then combined into a single bill, which the lower house passed on Wednesday. However, the Thai parliament has so far rejected proposals to allow people to change their gender identity, despite the high visibility of transgender communities here.Thailand still stands out in South East Asia, where same-sex intimacy is criminalised in some countries. It is also an outlier in Asia. In 2019, Taiwan’s parliament became the first in Asia to legalise same-sex marriage. Nepal registered its first same-sex union in November last year, five months after the Supreme Court ruled in favour of it.This was just one month after India’s top court had ruled against it, leaving the decision to the government, which said it would set up a panel that would decide on more legal rights for same-sex couples. The LGBTQ+ community has also been fighting for marriage equality in Japan, where district courts have ruled that the ban is unconstitutional. Polls show public support for it but stiff opposition from older, traditional ranks of the ruling party has stymied efforts. Singapore scrapped a colonial-era law that banned gay sex in 2022, but also amended its constitution to prevent the courts from challenging the definition of marriage as one between a man and a woman. Additional reporting by the BBC’s Thanyarat Doksone in BangkokRelated TopicsMarriageAsiaThailandSame-sex marriageLGBTTop StoriesPublic satisfaction with NHS at lowest ever levelPublished1 hour agoLive. Ship set to be boarded after six presumed dead in Baltimore bridge collapseLost power, mayday call and crash before Baltimore bridge collapsePublished10 hours agoFeaturesLost power, mayday call and crash before Baltimore bridge collapseHow a US bridge collapsed after being struck by a ship. VideoHow a US bridge collapsed after being struck by a shipThe Papers: ‘Heartbreak bridge’ and church ‘asylum fiasco’Why some Tory MPs are stepping downThe women behind a fugitive rapist’s downfallFight for justice decades on from oil rig disaster£5bn Thames super sewer set for completionSharleen Spiteri finds magic in Muscle ShoalsLocal elections 2024: Is there an election in my area?Elsewhere on the BBCGlamour, fortune, violence, redemption and healingPop star Mel B and the advice she would give her younger selfAttributionSoundsThe man who combatted Goebbels’ propagandaHow Sefton Delmer became Britain’s master propagandist during the Second World WarAttributionSoundsTime to learn and laughPaul Sinha improves your general knowledge with fascinating facts and hilarious storiesAttributionSoundsCan you imagine sounds in your head?Claudia Hammond delves into the evidence on mental health, psychology and neuroscienceAttributionSoundsMost Read1Holidaymakers caught out by 10-year-passport rule2Banksy tree mural covered in plastic and boards3’Heartbreak bridge’ and church ‘asylum fiasco’4£5bn Thames super sewer set for completion5Titanic prop that sparked debate sells for $718k6Lost power, mayday call and crash before Baltimore bridge collapse7The women behind a fugitive rapist’s downfall8Public satisfaction with NHS at lowest ever level9Taylor Swift’s dad avoids assault charge in Australia10Labour won’t commit to free childcare plan

[ad_1] The new law, which was passed by 400 of 415 of lawmakers present, will describe marriage as a partnership between two individuals, instead of between a man and woman.…

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaCongress vote averts US government shutdownPublished4 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, AFP via Getty ImagesBy James GregoryBBC NewsThe US Senate has agreed a $1.2tn spending package that will fund the US government through September. Legislators narrowly averted a partial shutdown of the government with minutes to go before a midnight deadline. While votes on a series of amendments are expected to continue for several hours, the agreement means that there will be no lapse in funding to key government departments.It should be ready to be signed by President Joe Biden on Saturday. Democrat Senate majority leader Chuck Shumer said it had not been easy, but “our persistence has been worth it”. “It is good for the American people that we have reached a bipartisan agreement to finish the job,” he said on the Senate floor. The legislation will bring an end to months of acrimonious wrangling between the two main parties. Congress races to pass spending bill as shutdown loomsWhy shutdowns seem to only happen in USThe White House said early on Saturday that the US Office of Management and Budget had ceased shutdown preparations because it was confident Congress would imminently pass the bill and President Biden would sign it into law.The bill has already passed the House of Representatives, with a final vote of 286 to 134 – narrowly above the two-thirds majority needed. All but 23 Democrats backed the legislation, while 112 Republicans voted no.A small but vocal group of conservatives had opposed proposed increases in government spending and called for new legislation that would include US immigration law changes aimed at addressing a surge of undocumented migrants at the US southern border.Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia filed a motion to force an election for a new House Speaker and replace Mike Johnson of Louisiana over his endorsement of the package.The House budget vote on Friday continues the trend in recent government-funding fights of Democrats joining some Republicans to approve legislation to avert a shutdown. Unlike recent votes, however, a majority of House Republicans opposed a funding bill negotiated by their own party.Related TopicsUnited StatesUnited States SenateJoe BidenMore on this storyWhat happens in a US government shutdown?Published1 October 2023Top StoriesLive. At least 60 killed in Moscow concert hall attack, Russia saysMoscow concert hall attack videos examined. VideoMoscow concert hall attack videos examinedPublished5 hours agoKing Charles hails Kate’s courage after cancer newsPublished26 minutes agoFeaturesThe papers: Kate’s ‘cancer shock’ and princess ‘getting stronger’What Kate video tells us about royal strategyThe Nazi hunter and the lost IRA documentaryFirst J-Pop, then K-Pop – could I-Pop be next?South Africa’s deadly love affair with gunsThe fortunes of Oasis’ first tour venues, 30 years onFrom the desert to the icy waters of WalesWhat we know about Kate’s cancer diagnosisHow Gaza war is testing the limits of US influenceElsewhere on the BBCFancy a film tonight?There’s something for everyone on BBC iPlayerAttributioniPlayerWhy did four tragic murders spark an online obsession?The case racked up nearly two billion views on TikTok worldwideAttributioniPlayerCan they take on an elite boarding school?Five black inner-city teens must leave their old worlds behind…AttributioniPlayerThe moment a fireball was caught on camera…But what was it and where did it end up?AttributioniPlayerMost Read1David Potts crowned winner of Celebrity Big Brother2Kate cancer diagnosis rewrites story of past weeks3Princess of Wales undergoing cancer treatment4Kate’s ‘cancer shock’ and princess ‘getting stronger’5Sick people leaving workforce at record highs6Chancellor says £100,000 not a huge salary in Surrey7Jordan North: How safe is vaping for my health?8High rural house prices force locals into renting9What we know about Kate’s cancer diagnosis10First J-Pop, then K-Pop – could I-Pop be next?

[ad_1] The Senate has agreed to vote for a $1.2tn package that will fund the US government.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaGaza war: How the crisis is testing the limits of US influencePublished1 hour agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsIsrael-Gaza warImage source, Getty ImagesBy Tom Bateman, state department correspondentTravelling with the US secretary of state A security guard thrust open the door to Antony Blinken’s armoured car and the US secretary of state strode out down a line of yellow barricades.”We’re working to get them home,” he declared, grabbing and gripping the hands of Israeli protesters in Tel Aviv calling for a deal to release the hostages held by Hamas.It was a striking moment but not altogether spontaneous. The street had by now been buzzing with security officials readying his route towards the protesters.Those of us in the travelling press were told to expect the interaction in the 20 minutes or so leading up to it. It was firmly caught on camera. This was a strong message from America’s top diplomat to both the Israeli public and its prime minister – the US was committed, engaged and pushing everything to get a ceasefire-for-hostage-release deal over the line. Mr Blinken has spent the last week trying to show this and something else to the wider world – that the US can influence Israel to also alleviate the suffering of Palestinian civilians – by surging more aid into Gaza, and to secure the territory’s long-term future. But as the crisis deepens, the limits of American influence have become increasingly clear.Blinken in Middle East to discuss post-war GazaEntire Gaza population facing acute hunger – US ‘He will come back’ – Israeli hostage families cling to hope, and demand a dealJust hours before the moment filmed at the barricades, the US had resorted to a vote in the UN Security Council to try to shape the actions of its ally.This was a sign of President Joe Biden’s growing exasperation. The American-drafted text called on Israel to surge more aid into Gaza amid UN warnings of imminent famine. It endorsed the current process mediated by Qatar to get a ceasefire in return for the release of hostages by Hamas. But it also warned Israel against a military assault on the city of Rafah, home to more than 1.4 million displaced Palestinians, saying an offensive could violate international humanitarian law. The resolution failed. It was vetoed by Russia and China. Speaking at Ben Gurion airport on Friday afternoon, Mr Blinken castigated those who voted it down. He implied they did so for reasons that had nothing to do with the substance, while also warning that a Rafah offensive could leave Israel without international support. “It risks killing more civilians, it risks wreaking greater havoc with the provision of humanitarian assistance, it risks further isolating Israel around the world and jeopardising its long term security and standing,” he said.Amid the growing rift between Washington and the Israeli leader, Mr Netanyahu struck back at Mr Blinken’s assessment. “I told him I hope we’ll do it with the support of the United States,” said the prime minister, “but if we have to, we’ll do it alone”. This was a superpower being pushed back, despite its pressure. ‘More humanitarian aid needs to be allowed in’I’ve seen the phenomenal force of US diplomacy at close quarters this week, trailing Mr Blinken on a time-zone shattering tour of Europe, Asia and ending in the Middle East trying to stem the current crisis. To America’s critics the paradox is clear: the US is sending weapons to a key ally, while at the same time urging it, without success, to do much more to alleviate the civilian suffering the military action has unleashed.A UN-backed food security assessment this week said 1.1 million people in Gaza were struggling with catastrophic hunger and starvation, adding that a man-made famine in the north was imminent between now and May.A growing number of US politicians have also spoken out. This week a group of Democratic senators and nearly 70 former US officials, diplomats and military officers said President Biden should consider cutting weapons supplies to Israel if it keeps restricting humanitarian aid to Gaza.Israel blames the UN for a failure to distribute supplies. The UN categorically rejects this but Israel insists that checkpoint restrictions and attacks on police securing aid convoys have been a necessary part of its campaign to eliminate Hamas. I asked Mr Blinken in Manilla whether the security vacuum in Gaza was a harbinger of its future. How could he convince Israel to accept the his proposals? Hamas could end the suffering tomorrow, he said, if it surrendered. But he reiterated that more humanitarian aid had to be allowed in. Answering my question, he gave a US endorsement for the first time to a UN-backed measure on hunger, saying “100% of the population in Gaza is at severe levels of acute food insecurity. That’s the first time an entire population has been so classified.”Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, The US is pressing Israel to do much more to alleviate the civilian suffering in GazaMuch of Mr Blinken’s trip was crisis management. Trying to get aid into Gaza, get the hostages out and secure an end to the conflict, which the US says must ensure Hamas’s attack on Israel on 7 October “can never happen again”. At the same time it is trying to shape a post-war future. Washington wants the Palestinian Authority running Gaza. It is the entity formed during the 1990s Oslo Accords and driven out of Gaza by Hamas in 2007. The Americans think they can patch together a grand bargain for the Middle East. They want to pursue the long sought-after independent state for Palestinians in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza – albeit demilitarised – alongside a secure Israel: the so-called two-state solution. Gaza, rebuilt, would be governed by the internationally-backed Palestinian Authority, which is revitalised with money and security forces trained by Arab states, including Saudi Arabia. Added to this Riyadh would recognise Israel, a long-sought after goal for the Israelis that would further integrate it into the region. In return the Saudis would get advanced American weapons, a security pact with Washington and a US-backed civilian nuclear power programme. It sounds impossibly ambitious, and perhaps it is. The Americans are not naive about the chances of achieving the most illusive of goals in the Middle East, amid some of the worst bloodshed in the region’s modern history. But just as he did at the barricades, Mr Blinken thinks he can use a moment of crisis to grasp the initiative.Related TopicsIsrael-Gaza warIsraelTop StoriesLive. At least 60 killed in Moscow concert hall attack, Russia saysMoscow concert hall attack videos examined. VideoMoscow concert hall attack videos examinedPublished4 hours agoPrincess of Wales: I am having cancer treatmentPublished3 hours agoFeaturesThe papers: Kate’s ‘cancer shock’ and princess ‘getting stronger’What Kate video tells us about royal strategyWhat we know about Kate’s cancer diagnosisHow Gaza war is testing the limits of US influenceGrumpy gran aged 75 is global Fortnite sensationTrump poised for billions as stock market deal passesInside the ice cream van feeding familiesFleeing Ukraine’s embattled border villagesSolar eclipse spectacle set to grip North America againElsewhere on the BBCFancy a film tonight?There’s something for everyone on BBC iPlayerAttributioniPlayerWhy did four tragic murders spark an online obsession?The case racked up nearly two billion views on TikTok worldwideAttributioniPlayerCan they take on an elite boarding school?Five black inner-city teens must leave their old worlds behind…AttributioniPlayerThe moment a fireball was caught on camera…But what was it and where did it end up?AttributioniPlayerMost Read1Kate cancer diagnosis rewrites story of past weeks2Princess of Wales undergoing cancer treatment3Kate’s ‘cancer shock’ and princess ‘getting stronger’4Chancellor says £100,000 not a huge salary in Surrey5Jordan North: How safe is vaping for my health?6High rural house prices force locals into renting7What we know about Kate’s cancer diagnosis8Trump poised for billions as stock market deal passes9Lost elderly couple drive around city for 10 hours10Sick people leaving workforce at record highs

[ad_1] The US is cranking every lever to turn this crisis into a long-lasting peace. But is it an impossible dream?

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityBusinessMarket DataEconomyYour MoneyCompaniesTechnology of BusinessCEO SecretsArtificial IntelligenceHow Temu is shaking up the world of online shoppingPublished52 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesImage caption, It’s estimated that 152 million Americans use Temu every monthBy Sam GruetBusiness and technology reporterA record 123 million Americans tuned into this year’s Super Bowl. But as well as getting the nation’s biggest sporting event, a blockbuster halftime performance and several camera cutaways of Taylor Swift in the crowd, they also got six 30-second commercials for Temu – a Chinese-owned e-commerce company.The shopping giant has been criticised by politicians in the UK and US – a US government investigation finding an “extremely high risk” that products sold on Temu could have been made with forced labour.Temu says it “strictly prohibits” the use of forced, penal, or child labour by all its merchants.The company, which sells everything from clothes to electronics and furniture, first launched in the US in 2022 and later in the UK and the rest of the world.Since then, it has consistently topped global app download charts, with just under 152 million Americans using it every month, according to data gathered by analyst SimilarWeb.It’s “Amazon on steroids,” says retail analyst Neil Saunders, and with the tagline “shop like a billionaire” it has exploded in popularity, shipping to 49 countries worldwide.Image source, TemuImage caption, Temu spent close to $1.7bn on ads in 2023, according to SimilarWebA typical 30-second Super Bowl commercial costs around $7m (£5.5m), during this year’s event Temu had six of them. “It’s a lot of money for a very, short commercial,” Mr Saunders says. “But it is seen by an enormous number of people and we know that after that commercial Temu’s downloads spiked,” he adds. SimilarWeb data suggests individual visitors to the platform worldwide were up by nearly a quarter on the day of the Super Bowl compared with the previous Sunday, with 8.2 million people browsing the website and app. In the same period, Amazon and Ebay’s visitors were down by 5% and 2% respectively. “They’ve also spent a lot of money on micro-marketing, persuading influencers to push products and to suggest buying things on the platform via social channels like TikTok and YouTube,” says Mr Saunders. These influencers typically have fewer than 10,000 followers according to Ines Durand, an e-commerce expert at SimilarWeb.”Micro-influencers have strong communities, so their endorsement means a strong trust towards these products,” she explains.Temu is owned by Chinese giant Pinduoduo – “a monster in Chinese e-commerce,” according to Shaun Rein, founder of the China Market Research Group. “Throughout China, everyone buys products on Pinduo, from speakers to t-shirts or socks,” he says. More technology of businessCan Stockholm keep its edge in the music industry?Could product passports revolutionise the way we shop?Why firms are racing to produce green ammoniaWhy some cyber-attacks hit harder than othersThe brewing secrets behind tastier no-alcohol beerThe company consistently trades places with rival Alibaba for the top spot of most valuable Chinese firm listed on a US stock exchange. Its current worth sits at just under $150bn (£117bn).With the Chinese consumer market under its spell, Pinduoduo expanded overseas with Temu, using the same model that had ensured its previous success. According to Mr Rein, who is based in Shanghai, the firm has become a great source of pride and patriotism.”They’re proud that Chinese companies can slay the e-commerce dragons from the United States like Amazon,” he adds. A quick scroll through the Temu app or website will bring up anything from steel-toecap trainers to a device designed to help the elderly and pregnant women put on socks. A menagerie of manufactured goods, almost entirely produced in factories in China, Mr Rein explains.”Temu use an amazing, system that relies on, heavy data collection at scale,” says Ines Durand.”They collect data on consumer trends, the most searched and clicked products, which they give to individual manufacturers.”Ms Durand says that while Amazon sells this data to manufacturers at a premium, Temu gives it to producers free of charge – information they use to “test the market” with a relatively small number of products. The platform often uses AI-generated images to keep up to date with the very latest trends, so the product on sale may not even exist yet, according to Ms Durand. Then they are shipped by air.”It means products don’t need to be stored. They don’t need to go to warehouses once it’s shipped by aeroplane, you go straight to the customer,” says Ines Durand. Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Temu ships straight from factories in China to the customerA third of parcels that came into the US last year under a shipping loophole known as the de minimis threshold were from Temu and competitor Shein, according to a report from US Congress.Many countries – including the UK and USA have a de minimis threshold, designed to help citizens to import goods.So as Temu’s goods are shipped directly from the factory floors, cutting out the middlemen, they become essentially duty-free.More regulation may be on the horizon to close up shipping loopholes, however, according to Mickey Diaz, chief operating officer at global freight company Unique Logistics. “The UK has already started to look at Temu with some scrutiny, including the sale of weapons that are otherwise not allowed into the UK, which were being imported because of these loopholes,” she explains.Temu has been criticised for its supply chains too, with UK and US politicians accusing the e-commerce giant of allowing goods produced with forced labour to be sold on its site. Last year, Alicia Kearns MP, head of the foreign affairs select committee, told the BBC she wanted greater scrutiny of the online marketplace to make sure “consumers are not inadvertently contributing to the Uyghur genocide”.Temu says it “strictly prohibits” the use of forced, penal, or child labour by all its merchants. It told the BBC anyone doing business with it must “comply with all regulatory standards and compliance requirements”.”Temu’s merchants, suppliers, and other third parties must pay their employees and contractors on time and comply with all applicable local wage and hours laws.”Our current standards and practices are no different from other major e-commerce platforms trusted by consumers, and allegations in this regard are completely ungrounded,” a spokesperson added. Despite the controversy, analysts expect further expansion for Temu.”We’ll probably see teams start to round out its offer more, perhaps pushing into some slightly higher priced products” predicts retail analyst Neil Saunders.According to Shaun Reid, the focus will be on grabbing an even bigger slice of the market.”For the next two to three years, their strategy is just to grow brand awareness and market share. They don’t care about profits. “That’s exactly what happened with Pinduoduo when it launched in China. They were giving incredibly cheap deals just to grab market share.”Related TopicsInternational BusinessAmazonChinaTechnology of BusinessTemuTop Stories’Only God can change this place’: Haitians see no end to spiralling violencePublished2 hours agoPutin hails Crimea annexation after claiming election winPublished2 hours agoRwanda bill amendments overturned in Commons votePublished2 hours agoFeaturesThe Papers: Kate ‘pictured in public’ and ‘key’ Rwanda voteGaza faces famine during Ramadan, the holy month of fastingPredicting Putin’s landslide was easy, but what comes next?No choice for Ukrainians: More Putin means more warThe US Navy’s relentless battle against Houthi attacksThe councils fighting to stop themselves going bustChris Mason analysis: Rwanda saga won’t be over even when law is passedWhat is a heat pump and how much do they cost?High-seas drama over an ocean treasure troveElsewhere on the BBCThe true story of the Army’s ‘golden egg’ agentThe Big Cases investigates the true story of a spy in suburbiaAttributioniPlayerA satirical look at the scheming world of PRCharles Prentiss and Martin McCabe embark on a new career as spin doctorsAttributionSoundsThe ultimate bromanceWatch the masters of satire Peter Cook and Dudley Moore with a look back through the archivesAttributioniPlayer’I will lie on my deathbed wishing I’d done more’Former spin doctor Alastair Campbell on what he’s learned from his life so farAttributionSoundsMost Read1Katie Price declared bankrupt for second time2Kate ‘pictured in public’ and ‘key’ Rwanda vote3Oldest surviving England player dies at 944Rwanda bill amendments overturned in Commons vote5Trump unable to get $464m bond in New York fraud case6’Only God can change this place’: Haitians see no end to spiralling violence7Putin hails Crimea annexation after claiming election win8Zac Goldsmith banned after speeding seven times9Customers withdraw millions after cash machine glitch10Energy grid needs £60bn upgrade to hit green target

[ad_1] With the Chinese consumer market under its spell, Pinduoduo expanded overseas with Temu, using the same model that had ensured its previous success. According to Mr Rein, who is…

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaOccupied Ukraine encouraged to vote in Russian election by armed menPublished16 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsWar in UkraineImage source, Russian-controlled Donetsk election commissionImage caption, People in occupied Ukraine are being strongly encouraged to vote in Russia’s upcoming presidential elections – which Putin is expected to winBy Vitaly ShevchenkoBBC MonitoringMoscow has launched a wide-ranging campaign telling residents of occupied parts of Ukraine to vote in Russia’s presidential election.For the first time, the national vote is taking place over three days (15-17 March), but additional early voting has already begun in the occupied parts of four Ukrainian regions: Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Donetsk and Luhansk.One resident complained of pro-Russian collaborators with ballot boxes going from house to house looking for voters accompanied by armed soldiers.Vladimir Putin will certainly win another term of office, but a high turnout would help the Kremlin’s efforts to legitimise his continued rule.It would also be used to justify Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Vladimir Putin is one of four candidates on the ballot, but none of the others poses a realistic challenge.All of his most outspoken critics have either been forced into exile, jailed, or have died.Coerced into votingVoting normally starts early in remote parts of Russia, but the procedure has been extended to the four partially occupied regions of Ukraine “for security reasons”.There are a variety of ways in which Ukrainians under occupation are being coerced into voting. Image source, Tavria TVImage caption, Authorities are setting up free concerts and food to entice voters to polling stations, a tactic used in the Soviet eraEven though occupation authorities have set up polling stations, voters are not required to visit them as those same authorities have dispatched people with ballot boxes to their homes.”Dear voters, we worry about your safety! You do not have to go anywhere to vote – we will come to your home with ballots and boxes!” the Russia-installed electoral commission in the Zaporizhzhia region said on social media.Ukrainians under occupation are also put under pressure through a pro-vote campaign called InformUIK, ostensibly designed to inform them about the procedure of voting, as well as all the candidates. It seeks to visit all remaining residents of Russian-occupied regions at home – and its representatives are often accompanied by armed men.They collect personal data to compile lists of voters, and sometimes film local residents during such visits. Russia’s electoral chief in the partly occupied Zaporizhzhia region acknowledged that locals were worried about the filming. Ukrainians have already come under considerable pressure to take Russian passports, but Ukrainian passports are being accepted as proof of ID to make voting even easier.Image source, Russian-controlled Kherson election commissionImage caption, In occupied Ukraine, people don’t have to go to vote – the ballot boxes find themResidents have been sent text messages informing them of the dates of the vote and tried-and-tested Soviet methods are also being deployed to attract them to polling stations, such as free concerts and food.’It is abnormal when citizens collaborate’Ukraine has dismissed the vote as an illegitimate sham, and those involved in organising it have been targeted by attacks. The day early voting started in occupied parts of the Kherson region, on 27 February, there were two explosions in Nova Kakhovka: one targeting the offices of the Kremlin’s United Russia party, and the other near a polling station.Then last week Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Directorate said a local woman helping the Russian administration hold the election had been “liquidated” in a car bombing on 6 March in the occupied town of Berdyansk in the Zaporizhzhia region.Asked about who carried out the attack, the Ukrainian governor of the Zaporizhzhia region, Ivan Fedorov, told the BBC: “Somebody did it. Somebody who showed great resistance. Some heroes who do it on temporarily occupied territories. “Our resistance shows that it is abnormal when our citizens collaborate with Russians. Somebody did not understand. That’s why this somebody got killed.” Image source, Ukrainian intelligenceImage caption, Ukrainian military intelligence announced last week that a woman who had helped with the voting had been “liquidated” in a car bombingWhen asked to clarify if people behind the attack were linked to the Ukrainian state, Mr Fedorov added: “Yes, of course. There is great co-operation between our resistance inside the temporarily occupied territories and our secret services.”While Russia-installed officials and media in occupied parts of Ukraine are busy promoting the vote, they do not focus too much on drumming up support for any particular candidate – and they don’t need to. Vladimir Putin is the mastermind of these regions’ annexation by Russia, and nationally the vote is being presented as an endorsement. The official symbol of the 2024 presidential election is the V-sign associated with his “special military operation” in Ukraine. The official slogan adopted by Russia’s Central Electoral Commission is “Strong together – vote for Russia!” Both the V symbol and the slogan appear in posters dotted around occupied parts of Ukraine, including at polling stations. Kremlin media have already trumpeted early voting in Ukraine as a resounding success. ‘This isn’t democracy, it’s a comedy show'”It was a real holiday! With music, balloons and Russian flags!” the Komsomolskaya Pravda tabloid said of the early voting campaign in the Kherson region, which concluded on 3 March. “Tens of thousands of people!”Kremlin propaganda is using the election to paint a picture of unanimous support for Russia’s invasion and annexation of Ukraine.But these carefully choreographed images come at the expense of thousands of critics silenced, deported, jailed or killed. Many have left – especially young people – unwilling or unable to live under Russian occupation because of their views. Image source, Russian-controlled Kherson election commissionImage caption, The V symbol is everywhere in occupied Ukraine for this election – including polling stations and election leafletsUkraine’s Zaporizhzhia governor, Ivan Fedorov, says local residents of his partly occupied region are being intimidated into voting: “They go to every flat and every house and ask – would you like to vote? “Our citizens are very afraid. Of course if Russians with soldiers come to their flat and ask if they’d like to vote for Putin, everyone will say: OK, yes. Because everyone wants to save their life. But it does not mean that our citizens want to support Putin.”One resident of the Kherson region – the south-eastern part which is occupied by Russian forces – described to the BBC how voting was organised in his village.We are unable to disclose his name or location due to security concerns.”Pro-Russian locals visit households with ballot boxes, accompanied by armed military men. If they knock and no one opens, they move on to the next house. They don’t break into houses, but they do visit,” the local resident said. They added: “This is ridiculous. What kind of election is it when there are two locals – one holding a list of voters and the other a ballot box – and a military man with a machine gun? This isn’t democracy. It’s a comedy show.”Related TopicsWar in UkraineVladimir PutinUkraineMore on this story’We know what’s coming’: East Ukraine braces for Russian advancePublished6 days agoUkrainian teen who received call-up to Russian armyPublished10 November 2023’Denied medicine until they take a Russian passport’Published16 November 2023Top StoriesNo 10 says Tory donor’s alleged comments about Abbott were racistPublished3 hours agoBBC report into treatment of Gaza medics ‘very disturbing’ – CameronPublished6 hours agoGaza medics tell BBC that Israeli troops beat and humiliated themPublished19 hours agoFeaturesPM says donor was racist and ‘funeral home horror’The gangsters and rebels jostling over power in HaitiCan royals move on from Kate photo media storm?The Ukrainian sea drones hunting Russian warshipsHow the miners’ strike changed the role of womenMeet the pop star who brought some cheek to the Brit AwardsWhat is TikTok and could the US ban it?’We don’t feel the joy of Ramadan in Rafah’ Video’We don’t feel the joy of Ramadan in Rafah’Schoolboy recounts daring escape from Nigerian kidnap gangElsewhere on the BBCThe powerful emotional impact of Pink Floyd’s musicShine On You Crazy Diamond has helped people through their hardest timesAttributionSoundsFrom the largest ship to disasters on deck…A closer look at times when cruise ships have caused commotionAttributioniPlayer’I was mad for stuff but I didn’t realise I wasn’t happy’Stuart Mitchell’s search for happiness will make us all question the true cost of livingAttributionSoundsMisled with the promise of a home…Panorama investigates the mobile home swindleAttributioniPlayerMost Read1UK to pay failed asylum seekers to move to Rwanda2Navalny ally Leonid Volkov attacked in Lithuania3No 10 says Tory donor’s alleged comments were racist4Ashes and 35 bodies removed from funeral home5Ghislaine Maxwell appeals sex abuse conviction6Andrew Tate and brother can be extradited to UK7PM says donor was racist and ‘funeral home horror’8Can royals move on from Kate photo media storm?9Ukraine-based groups claim raids into Russia10Warning after cat falls into Japan chemical vat

[ad_1] Pro-Russian officials – backed by armed men – are urging people in occupied Ukraine to vote.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaBiden and Trump rally in Georgia as 2024 rematch loomsPublished4 hours agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsUS election 2024Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, President Joe Biden is going on the offence following his State of the Union address on ThursdayBy Gary O’Donoghue and Sam Cabralin Atlanta and WashingtonDonald Trump and Joe Biden have both held campaign rallies in the US state of Georgia, as their general election showdown comes into greater focus.The former president, 77, slammed Thursday’s State of the Union speech as an “angry, dark and hate-filled rant”.An hour down the road, President Biden, 81, unveiled new endorsements as he goes on the offence against his rival.Both men are now within striking distance of clinching their respective party nominations for president.Mr Trump has so far amassed 1,076 delegates and is 139 away from the number needed to lock in the Republican nod. Mr Biden has collected 1,859 delegates, 109 short of what he needs to secure the Democratic ticket.Each man has the chance to complete the task in primary contests on Tuesday, including in Georgia.Their shadow-boxing duel on Saturday also comes two days after Mr Biden rebuked his predecessor’s rhetoric and record in harsh terms during his State of the Union address to Congress.Biden draws election battle lines in fiery speechSpeaking in the north-western city of Rome, Mr Trump hammered his “grossly incompetent” opponent for “the most divisive, partisan and radical speech ever delivered by a president in that chamber”.”Joe Biden should not be shouting angrily at America,” he argued.”America should be shouting angrily at Joe Biden.”This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Watch: We asked MAGA: is there anything good about Biden?He also zeroed in on border security and the murder last month of Laken Riley, a Georgia college student allegedly killed by an undocumented immigrant.Immigration is now the top concern for US voters, according to a Gallup poll released last month.With supporters holding aloft photos of Ms Riley, and her family and friends in attendance, the former president vowed to “demand justice for Laken” and “seal the border”.He also slammed Mr Biden for rowing back on comments during the State of the Union in which he referred to the suspect as “an illegal”. The president expressed regret in an MSNBC interview that he had not used Democrats’ preferred term – undocumented.Mr Biden’s controversial remark came during an exchange with top Trump ally Marjorie Taylor Greene, who rallied with Mr Trump on Saturday in Rome, the city she lives in and represents in Congress. Speaking about an hour’s drive away in the capital city of Atlanta, Mr Biden told supporters: “It can tell you a lot about a person, who he keeps company with.”Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Donald Trump campaigned in Georgia congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene’s hometown of Rome on SaturdayHe attacked Mr Trump – who also hosted Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban at his Florida home on Friday – for “sucking up to wannabe dictators and authoritarian thugs all over the world”.Reframing November’s general election as “a contest between competing forces in a battle for the soul of this nation”, the president reiterated his view that Mr Trump’s “story of resentment, revenge and retribution” was not in the best interests of voters.Fresh off the buzz of a State of the Union watched on television by more than 32 million Americans, Mr Biden’s campaign for re-election is on the offensive.He visited the battleground state of Pennsylvania on Friday, and will rally in Michigan and Wisconsin next week, while members of his administration are also fanning out across the country.Did State of the Union change how voters see Biden?In coming weeks, “we will dramatically expand our volunteer engagement, scale up our battleground staff, launch our coalition groups, and invest in new paid media campaigns”, campaign manager Julie Chavez Rodriguez said.One such ad – that will target voters in seven swing states over the next six weeks – was launched earlier on Saturday and directly addresses concerns about his age.”Look, I’m not a young guy, that’s no secret,” it begins, before making the case that the veteran politician’s experience has helped him “understand how to get things done for the American people”.During his Saturday appearance in Atlanta, Mr Biden’s crowd was small but enthusiastic, holding up signs passed around by organisers with the phrase “we’re on board”.At the event, the campaign formally unveiled an endorsement from a trio of political action groups, who will spend $30m (£23.3m) to mobilise black, Latino and Asian voters in support of the Democrat.The president hit on many of the points from his punchy address on Capitol Hill, delivering remarks with energy that seems to have suffused his new style.Keeping up that pace over the next eight months will be challenging, but it comes as no surprise his latest tit-for-tat with Mr Trump came in Georgia.Based on the results of their 2020 race, the southern state is the most marginal one in the country. Mr Biden won here by fewer than 12,000 votes.A big part of his victory came from almost nine out of ten black voters supporting him, but recent polls have provided worrying signs, with a distinct lack of enthusiasm among many black voters for Mr Biden’s candidacy.Polls show Mr Trump in the lead here, but he too has problems. Georgia is home to one of the four criminal cases against him that could go to trial before the election, and he faces 13 felony charges over his alleged efforts to overturn his 2020 loss in the state.In short, Georgia is on both these men’s minds and victory in November may well hinge on its result.Related TopicsGeorgiaUS election 2024Donald TrumpUS politicsJoe BidenMore on this storyVoters on election rematch: ‘I wish younger candidates had a chance’Published4 days agoTrump ally and daughter-in-law to lead RepublicansPublished1 day agoBiden draws election battle lines in fiery speechPublished1 day agoDid State of the Union change how voters see Biden?Published1 day agoTop StoriesUS military ship heading to Gaza to build portPublished3 hours agoIDF completes road across Gaza, satellite images showPublished6 hours agoJohnson flew to Venezuela for unofficial talksPublished2 hours agoFeaturesThe Papers: Gove’s extremism warning and Johnson in trip to VenezuelaApple ‘like Godfather’ with new App Store rulesThe people keeping the historic foot ferry afloatHow China’s boarding schools are silencing Tibet’s languageWhat a $1 deal says about America’s office marketYour pictures on the theme of ‘speed’Man behind viral fake currency shocked by its successDNA’s discovery changed the world – and my life. VideoDNA’s discovery changed the world – and my lifeOn patrol with the anti-social behaviour squadElsewhere on the BBCHair-pulling, punching and kickingFootage from the moment a brawl erupts in the Maldives ParliamentAttributioniPlayerExploring the mysterious deaths of Nazi fugitivesThree brothers investigate whether a family connection may explain the truthAttributioniPlayerFrom triumph to tragedy…After more than 30 years of service, America’s space shuttle took to the skies for the last timeAttributioniPlayerCan they take on an elite boarding school?Five black inner-city teens must leave their old worlds behind…AttributioniPlayerMost Read1Doctor reveals how ‘brutal’ therapy tackled Rhod Gilbert’s cancer2King gives Scotland’s top honour to Prince Edward3Johnson flew to Venezuela for unofficial talks4Gove’s extremism warning and Johnson in trip to Venezuela5Earl Spencer reveals abuse at boarding school6IDF completes road across Gaza, satellite images show7’Oh my god!’ Donatella Versace rescued from lift8Attack victims hit out at extremism in open letter9Moscow student jailed for pro-Ukraine wi-fi name10US military ship heading to Gaza to build port

[ad_1] Both men are expected to clinch their respective parties’ nominations for president on Tuesday.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaTaylor Swift urges voters to the polls ahead of Super TuesdayPublished45 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsUS election 2024Image source, Getty ImagesBy Matt MurphyBBC News, WashingtonPop superstar Taylor Swift has urged people to head to the polls, as voters across the US prepare to vote in the Super Tuesday primary elections.Sixteen states will cast their ballots to pick the Republican and Democratic nominees for president. In a post to Instagram, the singer urged her 282 million followers to “make a plan to vote today”. Swift, who backed President Joe Biden in 2020, has yet to endorse any candidate for November’s poll. She maintained her silence on that front on Tuesday, instead directing voters to check where their local polling station would be. “I wanted to remind you guys to vote the people who most represent YOU into power. If you haven’t already, make a plan to vote today,” she wrote. “Whether you’re in Tennessee or somewhere else in the US, check your polling places and times at vote.org.” The multiple Grammy winner has a social media following which dwarfs that of Mr Biden and his presumptive challenger, former President Donald Trump. Her approval among US adults also outshines the men, with 40% of registered voters saying they had a positive view of the singer. When asked about efforts to secure Swift’s backing by late-night host Seth Myers last week, Mr Biden joked: “That’s classified.” Asked on Tuesday about Swift’s silence on Biden thus far, White House spokesperson Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters: “I can’t comment on what Taylor Swift is saying or not saying”.But the White House is believed to be heavily courting her endorsement, hoping that it could prompt millions of younger voters to back Mr Biden’s re-election bid. US media reported earlier this year that Swift was the Biden campaign’s “biggest and most influential endorsement target”.In September, California Gov Gavin Newsom – a key ally to Mr Biden – urged Swift to become more involved with the president’s campaign. “Taylor Swift stands tall and unique,” he told reporters after a Republican debate. “What she was able to accomplish just in getting young people activated to consider that they have a voice and that they should have a choice in the next election, I think, is profoundly powerful.”Once the target of criticism for her seemingly apolitical stance, in recent years Swift has become more vocal in the political arena. She has been particularly outspoken in her criticism of Mr Trump. In May 2020, she accused him of “stoking the fires of white supremacy and racism your entire presidency”, adding “we will vote you out in November”.Ahead of the 2024 election, Mr Trump has already urged Swift not to endorse Mr Biden. Writing on Truth Social, the 77-year-old claimed there was “no way” she could be “disloyal” to him, claiming he made her “so much money” by passing the Music Modernization Act – legislation which aimed to ensure fair compensation for artists. The star has also become known for her efforts to ensure young people are registered to vote. In September, her post to Instagram urging people to register to vote saw 35,000 people sign-up online, according to Vote.org. The message, posted on National Voter Registration Day, also prompted a 115% increase in 18-year-olds registering compared to 2022, the site said. The singer’s perceived political power has increasingly seen her become the target of online conspiracy theories, driven especially by conservative social media accounts.Before last month’s Super Bowl Swift and her boyfriend, Kansas City Chiefs star Travis Kelce, became the target of conspiracy theories boosted by some allies of Mr Trump, including former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy. Spread online, advocates claimed the NFL game had been fixed for Kelce’s side to allow the couple to endorse Mr Biden at the game’s conclusion. NFL commissioner Roger Goodell called the theory “nonsense”. Related TopicsTaylor SwiftUS election 2024Donald TrumpJoe BidenMore on this storyWe’ve no inside scoop on Swift/Kelce fling – White HousePublished4 October 2023Biden confuses Britney and Taylor at Turkey ceremonyPublished20 November 2023Swift Super Bowl conspiracy theories ‘nonsense’AttributionSportPublished6 FebruaryTop StoriesHunt expected to cut National Insurance tax by 2pPublished1 hour agoBirmingham City Council signs off ‘devastating’ cutsPublished2 minutes agoArmy to remove Kate appearance claim from websitePublished1 hour agoFeaturesWhy food airdrops into Gaza are controversialFour things to watch as 15 US states vote on Super TuesdayDo councils spend too much on diversity schemes?Tax, childcare, vapes: What could be in the Budget?Moment astronauts hug as they arrive at space station. VideoMoment astronauts hug as they arrive at space stationThe sound that signalled death for IRA ‘informers’In Ukraine, the show must go on – even undergroundInside the Gaza camp for widows and childrenWatch: Chinese boats fire water at a Philippine vessel. VideoWatch: Chinese boats fire water at a Philippine vesselElsewhere on the BBCCan you beat the energy price cut?Tune in to Martin’s advice on the latest energy cuts, train crises and money tipsAttributionSoundsThe ultimate bromanceWatch the masters of satire Peter Cook and Dudley Moore with a look back through the archivesAttributioniPlayerAgeing, nicknames and cinema shoutingComedian Frank Skinner dishes out laughs and wisdom in this latest interviewAttributionSoundsWill this elite boarding school fit around them?Five black inner-city teens must leave their old worlds behind…AttributioniPlayerMost Read1Army to remove Kate appearance claim from website2Woman yanked into air by shop shutters finds fame3Birmingham City Council signs off ‘devastating’ cuts4Hunt expected to cut National Insurance tax by 2p5German patient vaccinated against Covid 217 times6Dan Wootton departs GB News after Ofcom ruling7US pilot over alcohol limit before Edinburgh flight8Tesco latest supermarket to increase staff pay9Talk TV to be taken off air and moved online10Firth’s Pride and Prejudice shirt fetches £25,000

[ad_1] The singer tells her 282 million followers to “make a plan to vote” on Super Tuesday.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityAsiaChinaIndiaBad blood over Singapore Taylor Swift tour subsidiesPublished1 hour agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, EPAImage caption, The Singapore leg of the Eras tour has Swifties flying in from around the regionBy Frances Maoin SingaporeIn the glitzy Asian city-state of Singapore, the sequins are out, limousines polished and hotel pillows plumped.The city’s hosting Taylor Swift’s Eras tour this week – an honour, but one that has come at a cost.That cost was initially reported to be as high as S$24 million (£14m; $18m) for the six shows to be exclusive to South East Asia.Culture minister Edwin Tong has since told Singapore’s CNA the figure was “nowhere as high” – although he still refused to be drawn on the exact figure. The broadcaster, however, suggested it may have been just $2m for all six.But the fact any money had been spent only came to light after an outburst from the prime minister of Thailand, who accused Singapore of paying concert organisers US$2-3m per night.That triggered criticism across the region. In the Philippines, a lawmaker criticised the move, saying “this isn’t what good neighbours do” – and called for a formal protest against the grant.But while governments are seeing red – it’s the fans who are paying the price, literally.Swift is heard everywhere across South East Asia, home to roughly 700 million people – from alleyways in Ho Chi Minh to taxi cabs in Bangkok. So for many it was a punch in the guts to learn all six shows would be held in the region’s most expensive city.Singapore’s currency – one of the strongest in Asia – has long been a deterrent for visitors. But for a chance to see their idol, many of her fans are willing to grin and bear it.Look what you made me doFlight-loads of fans have been touching down at Singapore’s Changi Airport all week, many coming from China and its territories.Swift isn’t playing in China so Singapore is the next best thing for many.One woman flying in from Shenzhen told the BBC she and her friend had spent S$1,200 each on tickets alone. They’ve resorted to camping at a friend’s house after hotel rates across the city surged.Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Taylor Swift in Sao PauloOn the luxe end of things, the city’s landmark hotel Marina Bay Sands has sold out of its S$50,000 Swift packages which included four VIP tickets and a three-night stay in a suite.Then there’s 22-year-old Allen Dungca in the Philippines, who scraped together his wages to take him and his mother to Singapore.This Thursday, they’ll take a four-hour bus ride to Manila, stay at an airport motel for the night, then grab their dawn flight the next day.The enterprising student snapped up the travel package back in July. He eventually tracked down the tickets on a resale night, after weeks of desperate hunting.”I am very lucky,” he says of the S$400 outlay for seats in the nosebleed section. “The seller was kind and not a scalper.” Resales now are going for thousands. And he had almost fallen for a scam, a shady character named Pat Steve, later exposed online. He estimates the whole endeavour is costing him S$2,000 – the monthly income of an upper-middle class family in the Philippines, a country where a fifth of the population lives under the poverty line.”Right now, I’m a student with a part-time job and I can afford my wants and needs. But it’s sad, other Swifties don’t have any means or budget to watch her overseas and I know most Filipino Swifties love her so much.”The Philippines arguably has the most ardent Swift fan base – Spotify data showed Quezon City in Manila had played the most streams of the singer last year.The Filipino Swiftie drag queen dazzling AsiaThe pop star has toured in the Philippines before – but the bag of money from Singapore undoubtedly sweetened the deal, say analysts.Clean, modern Singapore has long been seen as a base in the region for big events. It has the infrastructure, the transport links and a high-earning, expat-heavy population. Image source, EPAImage caption, Swift-themed water and light shows on the bay are among the city’s Swiftie attractions this weekIt’s also seen as reliably stable in a region which has experienced political chaos. A decade ago Swift cancelled her shows in Thailand because of the military coup and resulting protests.Still, while it’s common for governments around the world to give out subsidies and tax breaks to bring in events, the reported spend goes beyond anything else publicly known in Singapore.Samer Hajjar, a marketing lecturer at the National University of Singapore, says it’s “above average” even for the city-state.And fans are quite blunt. “It’s kinda greedy,” says Mr Dunga. “But it’s wise… because their economic response will be way more than that.”But will it be though?Show me the moneyIn Australia, the leg of the tour preceding Singapore, officials suggested the tour had provided a A$145m “uplift” in consumer spending. More than 570,000 tickets were sold across seven nights in Sydney and Melbourne, nearly double the number sold for Singapore’s six shows.But not all of that money counts, says economists.More than 90% of show-goers were probably local, estimates KPMG’s chief economist Dr Brendan Rynne, so their dollars would be “just a transfer from one category of spending (or saving) to another”.Only foreign visitors would have been adding to the books – and they accounted for just 2% of visitors, he estimated. After doing the maths he projected Swift had added only A$10m (£5.1m; $6.5m) to GDP.Still, Australia didn’t use public funds to have Swift play in the country, state government officials confirmed to the BBC. Neither did Japan, the only other Asian stop on the tour.What does Taylor mania mean for the globe? Singapore has said Swift’s tour will bring certain economic benefits to the country.But just how much net gain will be generated is unclear. The BBC has reached out to Singapore’s tourism board but they have refused to reveal foreign visitor estimates or other modelling. A local bank, Maybank, has suggested that consumer spending may top S$350m – but that’s based on the very optimistic prediction of 70% of attendees being from out of town.Even Singapore’s Formula One Grand Prix only saw 49% of spectators from overseas in 2022, with a record 300,000 crowd.Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Singapore’s F1 Grand Prix brings thousands of overseas visitors each yearWhen pressed on the numbers, Maybank’s economist Erica Tay could not provide specifics, saying the 70% rate was based on Singapore’s “potential catchment” and the bank was not interested in estimating net profit.”Six concerts may not move a nation’s economic growth materially, but the strategic value of Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Singapore as a tourism destination outweighs that one-off boost,” she said.But business professor Julien Cayla from Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University points out that public spend should be scrutinised – especially when it’s only revealed to citizens by another country’s government.And in a country where welfare benefits are relatively limited – it could be seen as a fraught spend.”To justify spending [reportedly] S$24 million on something that on the surface might not seem that critical to the economic health of the country over spending on people and public services… there’s a tension there,” Prof Cayla said.Nonetheless he and others say that when it comes to planning tourism, governments have mandate to throw around money and Singapore isn’t an exception. “They don’t necessarily like to advertise it. But the minute the government sees something that fits into a long-term strategy, it will sink government money in to support that,” he says.In a way, Singapore has just brought in Swift the same way it currently attracts huge multinational corporations.”What’s different here is that Taylor Swift as a business, is a very emotional business,” he said.”It’s dealing with the emotions of 10-18 year olds, who are very sad to not see the concert happening in Bangkok or Jakarta.”And in the words of the songstress herself, that’s caused a lot of bad blood.Related TopicsSingaporeTaylor SwiftAsiaPop musicUnited StatesMore on this storyWhat does Taylor mania mean for the globe?Published12 FebruaryThe Taylor Swift drag tribute dazzling AsiaPublished22 FebruaryWhat’s next for Taylor Swift in 2024?Published27 December 2023Super Bowl most watched US show since Moon landingPublished13 FebruaryDisney boss bets on Taylor Swift and FortnitePublished8 FebruaryTop StoriesHow more than 100 Gazans were killed at a food aid dropPublished5 hours agoSeven hostages killed in Gaza, Hamas saysPublished3 hours agoHow worried is Labour after losing Rochdale?Published8 hours agoFeaturesHow worried is Labour after losing Rochdale?Listen: Sunak’s Surprise Downing Street Speech. AudioListen: Sunak’s Surprise Downing Street SpeechAttributionSoundsHow big banks are becoming ‘Bitcoin whales’Weekly quiz: What word had Mary Poppins reaching for a spoonful of sugar?BBC Russia editor Steve Rosenberg marks St David’s Day on piano. VideoBBC Russia editor Steve Rosenberg marks St David’s Day on pianoAnti-war hero or dangerous egoist? George Galloway makes his comebackWhere and when is Eurovision 2024 taking place?Analysis: A royal dilemma as public curiosity over Kate growsWhy some singles are cutting things off after bad datesElsewhere on the BBCExperience Apollo 11’s adventure first-hand!Discover the awe-inspiring journey of Apollo 11 and its crew with newly released cockpit audioAttributioniPlayerHow did a booming computer manufacturer go bust?Commodore computers were huge in the 1980s, so why couldn’t the business adapt and survive?AttributionSoundsInseparable from birthMeet the remarkable conjoined twins defying medical expectations with the support of their fatherAttributioniPlayerSixth time lucky!The journey to hosting the Winter Olympics for Canadian ski resort Whistler BlackcombAttributionSoundsMost Read1Jools ‘can’t believe’ he’s finally hit number one2Rents soar in towns as tenants priced out of cities3What video and eyewitness accounts tell us about Gazans killed at aid drop4Three people injured in police pursuit shooting5Faroe Islands jumper uncovered 200 years later6Seven hostages killed in Gaza, Hamas says7How worried is Labour after losing Rochdale?8Driver rescued from truck dangling off US bridge9We must face down extremists, says Rishi Sunak10Crowds chant anti-Putin slogans at Navalny funeral

[ad_1] In Australia, the leg of the tour preceding Singapore, officials suggested the tour had provided a A$145m “uplift” in consumer spending. More than 570,000 tickets were sold across seven…

Other Story

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaCould you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New YorkersThis video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Could you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New YorkersCloseJury selection is under way in Donald Trump’s New York City hush-money trial, with hundreds of people selected as potential jurors.They must answer a questionnaire to determine, among other things, if they can be impartial about the former president.The BBC asked some of those questions to Manhattan residents.SubsectionUS & CanadaPublished50 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRead descriptionExplore moreCould you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New Yorkers. Video, 00:02:16Could you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New YorkersSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished50 minutes ago2:16Up Next. A view from inside court for Trump’s blockbuster trial. Video, 00:01:15A view from inside court for Trump’s blockbuster trialSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished19 hours agoUp Next1:15Press, police and protesters: Outside Trump courthouse. Video, 00:01:12Press, police and protesters: Outside Trump courthouseSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished1 day ago1:12Trump’s ‘perp walk’ moment explained in 60 seconds. Video, 00:01:00Trump’s ‘perp walk’ moment explained in 60 secondsSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished31 March 20231:00Editor’s recommendationsCopenhagen stock exchange engulfed by huge fire. Video, 00:01:03Copenhagen stock exchange engulfed by huge fireSubsectionEuropePublished12 hours ago1:03Moment spire collapses at Copenhagen stock exchange. Video, 00:00:43Moment spire collapses at Copenhagen stock exchangeSubsectionEuropePublished11 hours ago0:43Dormice ladders built in the Forest of Dean. Video, 00:00:51Dormice ladders built in the Forest of DeanSubsectionGloucestershirePublished1 day ago0:51Liz Truss: The world was safer under Trump. Video, 00:00:35Liz Truss: The world was safer under TrumpSubsectionUK PoliticsPublished22 hours ago0:35Huge fires blaze along Miami highway. Video, 00:00:33Huge fires blaze along Miami highwaySubsectionUS & CanadaPublished12 hours ago0:33Watch: Georgia opposition leader punches MP during debate. Video, 00:00:34Watch: Georgia opposition leader punches MP during debateSubsectionEuropePublished21 hours ago0:34Wheelie bins fly and a caravan overturns in strong wind. Video, 00:00:24Wheelie bins fly and a caravan overturns in strong windSubsectionStoke & StaffordshirePublished1 day ago0:24Hannah Waddingham calls out demanding paparazzi. Video, 00:00:28Hannah Waddingham calls out demanding paparazziSubsectionEntertainment & ArtsPublished1 day ago0:28Endangered California condor chicks hatched in LA. Video, 00:01:28Endangered California condor chicks hatched in LASubsectionUS & CanadaPublished1 day ago1:28

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityUKEnglandN. IrelandScotlandAlbaWalesCymruIsle of ManGuernseyJerseyLocal NewsFirst product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealedPublished11 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, ReutersImage caption, Meghan pictured at a polo match in Florida last weekBy Sean CoughlanRoyal correspondentA first glimpse of the new business venture from the Duchess of Sussex has been teased on social media, with pictures of a jar of strawberry jam.In a bid to preserve a sense of mystery, the jam from the new American Riviera Orchard brand seemed to be spread among friends and influencers.Fashion designer Tracy Robbins posted a picture of the jam on Instagram.It was numbered “17 of 50”, suggesting the number of recipients of this first fruit of the new business.The arrival of Meghan’s new California-based lifestyle brand had been signalled on social media last month and this suggests that it will be selling food products.What do we know about Meghan’s new brand?Five things about Harry and Meghan’s brand revampWhy did Harry and Meghan leave the Royal Family?There seemed to be have been something of a re-launch for Meghan and husband Prince Harry’s brands and businesses this year, beginning with the overhaul of their regal-looking website under the sussex.com label.Their latest projects seem to be moving away from a previous focus on their time as working royals, such as their Netflix film Harry and Meghan and Prince Harry’s memoir Spare.The hint about the strawberry jam from Meghan’s American Riviera Orchard brand seems to fit with the couple’s latest Netflix plans.Meghan is going to launch a Netflix show which will “celebrate the joys of cooking and gardening, entertaining, and friendship”.Prince Harry will be involved in another Netflix venture showing the inside track on the world of polo. That’s the equestrian sport, not the mints.Delfina Blaquier, married to Prince Harry’s polo-playing friend Nacho Figueras, also posted a picture of the new jam, with hers labelled “10 of 50”.The social media trail for American Riviera Orchard evokes a sense of the couple’s home in California – and this soft launch for the jam show pictures of the jars in a sunny basket of lemons.It’s not known how much items from the new lifestyle brand will cost. Although there are already plenty of other royals getting into jams. Visitors to the gift shops in royal palaces can get a Buckingham Palace Strawberry Preserve for £3.95 or Windsor Castle Fine Cut Seville Orange Marmalade, also for £3.95.On both sides of the Atlantic they seem to be conserving their finances.Related TopicsUK Royal FamilyMeghan, Duchess of SussexMore on this storyWhat we know about Meghan’s regal lifestyle brandPublished16 MarchMeghan launches surprise new lifestyle brandPublished14 MarchTop StoriesMPs back smoking ban for those born after 2009Published8 minutes agoMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished2 hours agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished7 hours agoFeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlinePlaying Coachella after cancer emotional, says DJHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Nursery boss ‘killed baby she strapped to beanbag’2Birmingham Airport flights disrupted by incident3Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge4First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed5MPs back smoking ban for those born after 20096Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference7Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames8Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline9Marten a ‘lioness’ who ‘loved her cubs’, court told10Sons of McCartney and Lennon release joint single

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaSupreme Court hears 6 Jan case that may hit Trump trialPublished2 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsUS Capitol riotsImage source, Brent StirtonImage caption, Hundreds of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol after holding a “Stop the Steal” rally on 6 January, 2021By Nadine YousifBBC NewsThe US Supreme Court have begun hearing a case that could undo charges for those who stormed the Capitol in 2021. It focuses on whether a 2002 federal law created to prevent corporate misconduct could apply to individuals involved in the 6 January riots. More than 350 people have been charged in the incident under that law, which carries a 20-year prison penalty.Donald Trump faces the same charge in the pending federal case accusing him of election interference. The law makes it a crime to “corruptly” obstruct or impede an official proceeding. On Tuesday, Supreme Court Justices heard two hours of arguments over the law’s interpretation. However, it remained unclear how they would rule. A lawyer for a man who stormed the Capitol and was prosecuted under the law argued before the Justices that “a host of felony and misdemeanour” crimes already exist to prosecute his clients actions.The 2002 law passed in the wake of the Enron accounting scandal, Jeffrey Green said, was not one of them. US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar counterargued that rioters deliberately attempted “to prevent Congress from certifying the results of the election,” therefore obstructing an official proceeding. Both fielded sceptical questions from the Justices. At one point, Mr Green argued that there is no historical precedent in which the law was used to prosecute demonstrators.Justice Sonia Sotomayor replied: “We’ve never had a situation before where (there was an attempt) to stop a proceeding violently, so I am not sure what a lack of history proves.”On the other hand, Ms Prelogar fielded questions from Justice Neil Gorusch on whether the law could then be stretched to apply to a “sit-in that disrupts a trial” or “a heckler” at the State of the Union Address. “Would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify for 20 years in federal prison?” he asked, appearing to reference an incident in which Jamaal Bowman, Democrat House representative, pressed a fire alarm in the Capitol.How the top court rules could have wide-ranging effects on the hundreds of people charged, convicted or sentenced under the law, as well as the prosecution of Mr Trump. Here is a breakdown of the key players and the law being argued: What is the 2002 federal law at the centre of the trial?The law is called the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. It was passed in response to the Enron scandal in the early 2000s, after it was exposed that those involved had engaged in massive fraud and shredding documents. It criminalizes the destruction of evidence – like records or documents. But it also penalises anyone who “otherwise obstructs, influences or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so.” How has it been used in response to the 6 January riots?Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) has brought obstruction charges against those who participated in the storming of the Capitol. Federal prosecutors argue they did so to impede Congress’ certification of the presidential electoral vote count to cement Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election. Therefore, the latter portion of the law that deals with obstructing an “official proceeding” would apply, the DoJ says. Who is challenging the law’s use in this case, and why? The Supreme Court is hearing a challenge to the law’s application brought forward by a former Pennsylvania police officer.Joseph Fischer was charged under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act with obstruction of a congressional proceeding on 6 January, as well as assaulting a police officer and disorderly conduct. His lawyers argue that prosecutors overreached with applying the Act, which they say deals explicitly with destroying or tampering with evidence integral to an investigation. Those who challenge the law’s application in 6 January cases also argue that a broad interpretation of the law would allow the prosecution of lobbyists or protestors who disrupt matters in Congress.How could the Supreme Court ruling impact Trump?The former president is charged under the very same law in a federal case accusing him of working to overturn the results of the 2020 election, which he lost to Mr Biden.If Supreme Court justices rule that the law does not apply to the 6 January rioters, Mr Trump could seek dismissal of half the charges he faces in that case.It also could be seen as a political win for the former president, who is seeking re-election in November, as he repeatedly has accused prosecutors of overreach. A final ruling is not expected until June. Related TopicsUS Capitol riotsDonald TrumpMore on this storySupreme Court to hear appeal over Capitol riot chargePublished13 December 2023A very simple guide to Trump’s indictmentsPublished25 August 2023Supreme Court asked to rule on Trump’s immunityPublished12 December 2023Top StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished1 hour agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished5 hours agoNo liberty in addiction, says health secretary on smoking banPublished4 minutes agoFeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2Birmingham Airport suspends flights over incident3First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed4Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference5Marten a ‘lioness’ who ‘loved her cubs’, court told6Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline7Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames8No liberty in addiction, says minister on smoking ban9Sons of McCartney and Lennon release joint single10Boy, 4, dies after fire at family home in Wigan

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaNational Conservatism Conference: Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels eventPublished4 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, ReutersImage caption, Nigel Farage said the decision to shut the conference down was as an attempt to stifle free speechBy Nick Beake in Brussels and Laura GozziBBC NewsBrussels police have been ordered to shut down a conference attended by right-wing politicians across Europe, including Nigel Farage and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.Organisers say the National Conservatism Conference in the Belgian capital is continuing, but guests are no longer allowed to enter. Local authorities had raised concerns over public safety.A UK spokeswoman called reports of police action “extremely disturbing”. She said that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was a “strong supporter and advocator for free speech” and that he was “very clear that cancelling events or preventing attendance and no-platforming speakers is damaging to free speech and to democracy as a result”.Alexander De Croo, the Belgian prime minister, said that the shutting down of the conference was “unacceptable”.Referring to the fact that it was the local mayor, Emir Kir, who opposed the conference, Mr De Croo added that while municipal autonomy was a cornerstone of Belgium’s democracy it could “never overrule the Belgian constitution guaranteeing the freedom of speech”. “Banning political meetings is unconstitutional. Full stop,” Mr De Croo wrote on X.In a message to organisers, Mr Kir had said some of the attendees of Tuesday’s conference held anti-gay and anti-abortion views. “Among these personalities there are several particularly from the right-conservative, religious right and European extreme right,” his statement said.Mr Kir also wrote on X: “The far right is not welcome.”Nigel Farage, who took to the stage this morning, told the BBC the decision to close down the conference because there were homophobes in the audience was “cobblers”, and that he condemned the decision as an attempt to stifle free speech. “Thank God For Brexit”, he said.Organised by a think-tank called the Edmund Burke Foundation, the National Conservatism Conference is a global movement which espouses what it describes as traditional values, which it claims are being “undermined and overthrown”. It also opposes further European integration.The conference said it aimed to bring together “public figures, journalists, scholars and students” who understood the connection between conservatism and the idea of nationhood and national traditions. French far-right politician Eric Zemmour, arriving for the conference after police had blocked the entrance, told journalists that Mr Kir was “using the police as a private militia to prevent… Europeans from taking part freely”.Organisers said Mr Zemmour was not allowed into the venue and that his address would be postponed.Former UK Home Secretary Suella Braverman and far-right French politician Eric Zemmour were listed as keynote speakers. The National Conservatism Conference reportedly started around 08:00 (06:00 GMT) on Tuesday and carried on for three hours until police showed up and asked the organisers to make attendees leave.Later, organisers wrote on X: “The police are not letting anyone in. People can leave, but they cannot return. Delegates have limited access to food and water, which are being prevented from delivery. Is this what city mayor Emir Kir is aiming for?”Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban and the former Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki were due to speak tomorrow. Earlier, the organisers said on X that they would challenge the order to shut the conference down. “The police entered the venue on our invitation, saw the proceedings and the press corps, and quickly withdrew. Is it possible they witnessed how peaceful the event is?,” they wrote on X.The Claridge event space – located near Brussels’s European Quarter – can host up to 850 people. Around 250 people were in attendance on Tuesday afternoon.Mohamed Nemri, the owner of Claridge, told the BBC he had decided to host the event because “we don’t reject any party…. even if we don’t have the same opinion. That’s normal”.”I am Muslim and people have different opinion and that’s it. We are living in a freedom country. I’d like to people to talk freely,” he added.It is the third venue that was supposed to hold the event, after the previous two fell through. Belgian media reported that one venue pulled out after pressure by a group called the “Antifascist coordination of Belgium”.Related TopicsBelgiumTop StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished43 minutes agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished5 hours agoLive. US expects to impose further sanctions on Iran ‘in the coming days’FeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed3Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference4Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline5Superdry boss hits back at ‘not cool’ criticism6Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames7MPs to vote on smoking ban for those born after 20098Stabbed TV presenter ‘feeling much better’9Sons of McCartney and Lennon release joint single10Baby hurt in Sydney stabbing out of intensive care

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaNasa says part of International Space Station crashed into Florida homePublished40 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, NASAImage caption, The recovered object was part of a stanchion used to mount batteries to a cargo palletBy Max MatzaBBC NewsUS space agency Nasa confirmed that an object that crashed into a home in Florida earlier this month was part of the International Space Station (ISS). The metal object was jettisoned from the orbiting outpost in March 2021, Nasa said on Monday after analysing the sample at the Kennedy Space Center.The 1.6lb (0.7kg) metal object tore through two layers of ceiling after re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. Homeowner Alejandro Otero said his son was nearly injured by the impact. Nasa said the object was part of some 5,800lbs of hardware that was dumped by the station after it had new lithium-ion batteries installed. “The hardware was expected to fully burn up during entry through Earth’s atmosphere on March 8, 2024. However, a piece of hardware survived and impacted a home in Naples, Florida,” the agency said.The debris was determined to be part of a stanchion used to mount batteries on a cargo pallet. The object, made from metal alloy Inconel, has dimensions of 4in by 1.6in (10.1cm by 4cm).Mr Otero told CBS affiliate Wink-TV that the device created a “tremendous sound” as it blasted into his home.”It almost hit my son. He was two rooms over and heard it all,” he said.”I was shaking. I was completely in disbelief. What are the chances of something landing on my house with such force to cause so much damage,” Mr Otero continued.”I’m super grateful that nobody got hurt.”According to Nasa, the ISS will “perform a detailed investigation” on how the debris survived burn-up.What’s the risk of being hit by falling space debris?Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No it’s more space junkSpace junk has been a growing a problem. Earlier this month, sky watchers in California watched mysterious golden streaks moving through the night sky.US officials later determined that the light show was caused by burning debris from a Chinese rocket re-entering earth’s orbit.In February, a Chinese satellite known as “Object K” burned up as it re-entered the atmosphere over Hawaii.Last year, a barnacle-covered giant metal dome found on a Western Australian beach was identified as a component of an Indian rocket. There are plans to display it alongside chunks of Nasa’s Skylab, which crashed in Australia in 1979. This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Object thought to be a satellite burns up on re-entering Earth’s atmosphereRelated TopicsSpace debrisNasaFloridaUnited StatesMore on this storyIs it a bird? Is it a plane? No it’s more space junkPublished3 AprilRobot dog trains to walk on Moon in Oregon trialsPublished3 days agoTop StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished50 minutes agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished4 hours agoLive. US expects to impose further sanctions on Iran ‘in the coming days’FeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed3Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference4Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline5Superdry boss hits back at ‘not cool’ criticism6Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames7MPs to vote on smoking ban for those born after 20098Stabbed TV presenter ‘feeling much better’9Baby hurt in Sydney stabbing out of intensive care10Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice forever

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaFormer Marine jailed for nine years for bombing abortion clinicPublished7 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsUS abortion debateImage source, CBSBy Max MatzaBBC NewsA former US Marine has been jailed for nine years for firebombing a California Planned Parenthood clinic and plotting other attacks to spark a “race war”.Chance Brannon, 24, pleaded guilty to the March 2022 attack on the healthcare clinic, which provides abortions in some of its locations.He also plotted to attack Jewish people and an LGBT pride event taking place at Dodger Stadium in Los Angeles. At the time of his arrest, he was an active duty member of the US Marines. Prosecutors said Brannon was a neo-Nazi who frequently spoke of “cleansing” the US of “particular ethnic groups”. In November, Brannon pleaded guilty to conspiracy, destruction of property, possession of an explosive and intentionally damaging a reproductive health services facility.Kristen Clarke, the assistant attorney general for the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, said the attack “was designed to terrorise patients seeking reproductive healthcare and the people who provide it”.The explosion damaged the front entrance to the clinic in Costa Mesa, Orange County. No one was injured.However, Mehtab Syed, of the FBI’s Los Angeles field office, said Brannon’s “deep-rooted hatred and extremist views… could have killed innocent people”. Mr Syed added that Brannon plotted to rob Jewish residents in the Hollywood Hills, and had also discussed plans to attack the power grid. Further to this, in 2022, Mr Syed said Brannon, of San Juan Capistrano, placed calls to two US “adversaries” hoping to offer himself as a “mole” providing US intelligence.Two co-defendants, Tibet Ergul and Xavier Batten, have pleaded guilty to similar charges and will be sentenced next month.According to the National Abortion Federation, a group representing US abortion providers, there was a “sharp increase” in violence against clinics in 2022. Related TopicsAbortionUS abortion debateUnited StatesCaliforniaMore on this storyWhat is Planned Parenthood?Published25 September 2015Top StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished53 minutes agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished3 hours agoLive. Israel demands sanctions on Iranian missile projectFeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference3Superdry boss hits back at ‘not cool’ criticism4First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed5Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline6Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames7MPs to vote on smoking ban for those born after 20098Stabbed TV presenter ‘feeling much better’9William to return to duties after Kate diagnosis10Baby hurt in Sydney stabbing out of intensive care