newsinsightplus.com
- 1943Related
- 1Gaelic
- March 5, 2024
- 0 Comments
BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC SportMenuHomeFootballCricketFormula 1Rugby URugby LTennisGolfBoxingAthleticsMoreA-Z SportsAmerican FootballAthleticsBasketballBoxingCricketCyclingDartsDisability SportFootballFormula 1Gaelic GamesGet InspiredGolfGymnasticsHorse RacingMixed Martial ArtsMotorsportNetballOlympic SportsRugby LeagueRugby UnionSnookerSwimmingTennisWinter SportsFull Sports A-ZMore from SportEnglandScotlandWalesNorthern IrelandMy SportMatch of the DaySports Personality5 Live SportSport on the BBCNews FeedsHelp & FAQsAmerican FootballScores & FixturesTablesNFL: Jason Kelce confirms retirement after 13 seasons with Philadelphia EaglesPublished5 hours agocommentsCommentsShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Last year Jason and Travis Kelce became the first brothers to play against each other in a Super BowlBy Ben CollinsBBC SportA tearful Jason Kelce confirmed his retirement on Monday after 13 seasons with the Philadelphia Eagles.The 36-year-old spent his entire career with Philadelphia, helping them win their first Super Bowl in 2018 and reach the NFL showpiece again in 2023.Kelce was a sixth-round draft pick by the Eagles in 2011 but is now regarded as one of the NFL’s best-ever centres.He cried as he began a statement lasting more than 40 minutes and continued to hold back tears.”I am very proud knowing where I was once was and the legacy I have left behind,” he said. Kelce denied that he had decided to retire in January, in the wake of the Eagles’ exit from last season’s play-offs, saying he needed time to consider his future. A seven-time Pro Bowl selection, he played 205 games and holds the franchise record for consecutive starts. He will be remembered as a Philadelphia legend, securing that status with a passionate speech during their Super Bowl parade in 2018 – on the steps made famous by the Rocky movies. The Eagles returned to the Super Bowl to take on the Kansas City Chiefs in 2023, with Kelce facing his brother Travis.Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Jason Kelce’s brother Travis and their parents also wiped away tears at the news conference in PhiladelphiaThe Kelces, who are from Cleveland, made history as they became the first brothers to play against each other in the NFL showpiece, with Travis’ Chiefs winning 38-35.”There is no chance I’d be here without the bond Travis and I share,” said Jason. “It is only too poetic that I found my career being fulfilled in the city of brotherly love.”Some people struggle to play in this city – I considered it a blessing to play in the most passionate sports town in America. Thank you Philadelphia, for letting me represent this city.”After finishing his statement, Kelce was applauded by the gathered media and hugged Travis, his parents, and his wife, Kylie.The Kelce brothers have become two of the most popular players in the NFL. Their New Heights podcast ended 2023 as the sixth biggest podcast in the United States,, external they have had their own Amazon Prime documentary, have appeared on Saturday Night Live and recorded a Christmas song which made it to the number one spot on iTunes.Jason was also named as one of People magazine’s sexiest men of the year, external for 2023 while Travis, 34, is now dating music superstar Taylor Swift.Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Jason Kelce has been one of the most colourful characters in the NFL, celebrating shirtless as his brother’s team beat Buffalo in JanuaryAfter the Eagles’ play-off exit, Jason supported his brother by attending the Chiefs’ play-off games.When he met Swift at Kansas City’s win at Buffalo in January, Jason went shirtless as he celebrated one of his brother’s touchdowns before jumping into the crowd and chugging a beer with the Bills fans. He then wore Chiefs dungarees for the Super Bowl and again went viral as he celebrated Kansas City’s win with his brother and Swift, wearing a luchador wrestling mask as they partied at a Las Vegas nightclub.Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie said: “He gave everything he had to all of us for 13 years. And he did it in a way that was truly authentic.”Jason was an incredible football player: A future Hall of Famer who would have been successful anywhere. But has there ever been a more perfect marriage between a player, a city and a team?”How Taylor Swift has led to even more headlines for Travis and Jason KelceGet American Football alerts in the BBC Sport appBig laughs and top quality content with Elis and John: Join the UK’s youngest and most relevant broadcastersCan three million people disappear from public memory? This is the story of the Bengal Famine of 1943Related TopicsAmerican FootballRelated Internet LinksNFLThe BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.View commentsTop Stories’One of worst displays I’ve ever seen’ – Sheff Utd’s new lowPublished34 minutes agoUK plans bid to host 2029 World ChampionshipsPublished2 hours agoBen Sulayem investigated for alleged race interferencePublished8 hours agoElsewhere on the BBCThe hidden world of drugs debtHow drug users are spiralling deeper into crime to pay dealers what they oweAttributioniPlayerWhat was it like to be at the Brit Awards?Annie Macmanus and Nick Grimshaw spill the beans from the big night in the back of a cab!AttributionSoundsWhat keeps Dame Siân Phillips ‘match fit’ at 90?The acclaimed actress opens her heart on camera for the first time about her life and careerAttributioniPlayerCan you afford to retire?Research suggests we’ll all need an extra £8,000 a year for a so-called moderate retirementAttributionSoundsElsewhere in SportWhich player has come of age? Garth Crooks’ Team of the WeekRider, runner, winner – the second coming of MeierIs Foden ‘the best in the Premier League right now’?’One of worst displays I’ve ever seen’ – Sheff Utd’s new lowAre Bayern Munich set for their worst season in over a decade?Reekie considers Rome diversion before Olympics’A legendary figure’ – darts commentator Green diesGB’s ‘most exciting crop for generations’ now look to ParisWho would make up a Six Nations sevens team? VideoWho would make up a Six Nations sevens team?’Verstappen win sets chilling tone for the season”Superstar’ Macario scores first goal in 644 days’It’s never over’ – Liverpool proving kings of the late winnerCaudery achieves ‘dream’ gold on emotional nightPogba: The backstory, the wasted talent & why it could be the end
[ad_1] A tearful Jason Kelce confirmed his retirement on Monday after 13 seasons with the Philadelphia Eagles. The 36-year-old spent his entire career with Philadelphia, helping them win their first…
![BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaMajor Alabama hospital pauses IVF after court rules frozen embryos are childrenPublishedJust nowShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Carlos DuarteImage caption, In vitro fertilization is a common form of fertility care in the US.By Kayla EpsteinBBC NewsA ruling from the Alabama Supreme Court that frozen embryos are considered children, and that a person could be held liable for accidentally destroying them, has opened up a new front in the US battle over reproductive medicine.The southern US state’s largest hospital has paused its in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) services in the wake of the decision, over fears it could expose them to criminal prosecution.The University of Alabama at Birmingham health system said it would continue retrieving eggs from women’s ovaries. But it said it would halt the next step in the IVF process, in which the eggs are fertilised with sperm before being implanted into the uterus.”We are saddened that this will impact our patients’ attempt to have a baby through IVF,” the leading state medical provider said in a statement.”But we must evaluate the potential that our patients and our physicians could be prosecuted criminally or face punitive damages for following the standard of care for IVF treatments.”Medical experts and reproductive advocacy groups warned the ruling could have negative consequences for fertility treatments in Alabama and beyond. Conservative groups welcomed the ruling, arguing that even the tiniest embryo deserved legal protection.Why did this lawsuit occur and what did the court rule?The case stems from a wrongful death lawsuit brought by three couples whose embryos were lost at a fertility clinic in 2020.A patient had wandered into the place where the embryos were stored, handled them, and accidentally dropped them. As a result, the embryos were destroyed.The couples sought to sue the Center for Reproductive Medicine and the Mobile Infirmary Association under the state’s Wrongful Death of a Minor Act. That law covers foetuses, but did not specifically cover embryos resulting from IVF.A lower court had ruled that the embryos did not qualify as a person or child, and that a wrongful death lawsuit could not move forward. But in its ruling, the Alabama Supreme Court sided with the couples, and ruled that frozen embryos were considered “children”. The wrongful death law applied to “all unborn children, regardless of their location”, the decision said.Concurring with the majority opinion, Chief Justice Tom Parker wrote: “Even before birth, all human beings have the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory.”What are the implications for Alabama fertility patients?The ruling does not ban or restrict IVF and in fact, the couples who brought the case actively sought out the procedure.But the decision may cause confusion about whether some aspects of IVF are legal under Alabama law, experts say. If an embryo is considered a person, it could raise questions about how clinics are allowed to use and store them.Elisabeth Smith, director of state policy at the Center for Reproductive Rights, told the BBC in a statement: “Not all [IVF] embryos are used, nor can they be. “To enact legislation granting legal personhood to embryos could have disastrous consequences for the use of IVF – a science many people rely on to build their families.” Ambiguity over the law could also extend to patients themselves, who may worry about whether the procedure remains available or legal.The Medical Association of the State of Alabama said in a statement: “The significance of this decision impacts all Alabamians and will likely lead to fewer babies – children, grandchildren, nieces, nephews, and cousins – as fertility options become limited for those who want to have a family.”How does this tie in with the US abortion debate?When the US Supreme Court struck down a nationwide right to abortion in 2022, it opened the door for states to make their own laws on the issue.Since the decision, Democratic-controlled states have expanded access while Republican-controlled states have restricted it.Alabama already has a total ban on abortion, at all stages of pregnancy.The White House called the Alabama ruling “exactly the type of chaos that we expected when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade and paved the way for politicians to dictate some of the most personal decisions families can make”.Abortion opponents are also watching this ruling closely. The question of when an embryo or a foetus is legally considered a person is a factor in many state abortion restrictions.The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal group, described the Alabama ruling as a “tremendous victory for life”.”No matter the circumstances, all human life is valuable from the moment of conception,” spokeswoman Denise Burke said in a statement to the BBC. “We are grateful the Court correctly found that Alabama law recognises this fundamental truth.”Other anti-abortion activists said IVF was not as clear-cut an ethical issue in their eyes, compared to terminating a pregnancy.Eric Johnston, a lawyer who helped draft Alabama’s constitutional language on abortion in 2018, told the BBC: “By and large the pro-life community would say that fertilised eggs are in need of protection.”But he acknowledged there were couples with anti-abortion views who had used IVF to have children, and said he would never condemn them.”It’s a dilemma, and a dilemma is something where you don’t have a satisfactory answer,” he added.What is IVF? Invitro fertilisation offers a possible solution where a woman faces challenges getting pregnant. Around 2% of US pregnancies are the result of IVF, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The process involves retrieving the woman’s eggs with a needle from her ovaries and combining them with a man’s sperm in a lab. The fertilised embryo is then transferred into the woman’s uterus, where it may create a pregnancy. But the process is not guaranteed, and it can take multiple attempts to create a successful pregnancy. In some cases, as in the Alabama trial, the fertilised embryos are frozen and stored in tanks containing liquid nitrogen. They can be held for up to a decade, experts say. What could happen in other states?US states often tend to replicate each other’s legislation, and the US has seen this pattern play out with abortion. Often, states will take cues from each other about what laws or policies have successfully passed legislatures or withstood legal challenges.Though the Alabama ruling only applies within the state, experts said other states could see legislative attempts or lawsuits aimed at advancing the concept that frozen embryos should legally be considered children or people.But they said it appeared unlikely this particular case would end up at the US Supreme Court, as the issue of abortion did, because the Alabama ruling originated in state court and concerns an interpretation of state, not federal, law.According to the Centers for Disease Control, 97,128 babies were born in the US as a result of IVF treatments in 2021.How could this ruling affect US politics?The right to abortion has been a winning issue for Democrats since the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade, which guaranteed the constitutional right to abortion up to the point of foetal viability, about 23-25 weeks. In the wake of the Alabama ruling, Democratic candidates could run on a platform of protecting access to fertility treatment across the United States.Republican politicians, meanwhile, often side with religious conservatives who want abortion banned or limited in the US.Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley, the only significant contender remaining in the race against Donald Trump for the party’s nomination, endorsed the Alabama Supreme Court’s decision on Thursday.”Embryos to me, are babies,” she said. “When you talk about an embryo, you are talking about, to me, that’s life and so I do see where that’s coming from when they talk about that.”You may also be interested in:This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Manon and Chris have been unable to conceive since having their daughter EfaRelated TopicsIVFAlabamaUnited StatesMore on this storyAlabama passes bill banning abortionPublished15 May 2019Four ways the end of Roe v Wade has changed AmericaPublished24 June 2023Top StoriesLive. SNP’s Flynn says party has no confidence in Speaker after Commons chaosPost Office victims set to be cleared under new lawPublished12 minutes agoUK targets Russian military with further sanctionsPublished46 minutes agoFeatures‘I miss you’: Ukraine’s children orphaned by Russian missileRosenberg: How two years of war have changed RussiaSahil Omar: The real story behind a fake criminalPostcode check: How’s the NHS coping in your area?Family share memories of Kenya’s marathon legendWhat does the Speaker of the House of Commons do?How AI is helping the search for extraterrestrial lifeWhy US politicians are on a pilgrimage to TaiwanOlivia Colman on why sweary letters were original trollingElsewhere on the BBCThe screening dilemma…Could good intentions to detect illnesses early actually be causing more harm?AttributionSoundsBritain’s toughest job interview is backLord Sugar’s class of 2024 chase the ultimate investmentAttributioniPlayerThe news remixed into weird shapes…Welcome to The Skewer, a twisted comedy treatAttributionSoundsOne of the world’s biggest scientific projects…Pallab Ghosh goes inside the largest particle accelerator in the worldAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Post Office victims set to be cleared under new law2Former world’s oldest dog stripped of title3Footballer Dani Alves guilty of nightclub rape4Warning over flooding as heavy rain lashes UK5Strictly dancer Windsor’s family thank fans6UK targets Russian military with further sanctions7’Little Britain’: How Russian media mocked UK missile failure8Sex assault case against Aerosmith star dismissed9First alopecia treatment recommended on the NHS10Dune 2 ‘like no other blockbuster’, say critics](https://newsinsightplus.com/wp-content/uploads/https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/branded_news/745E/production/_132709792_gettyimages-1498980269.jpg)
![BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaDiego Garcia asylum seekers feel unsafe on remote British island territoryPublished16 hours agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, HANDOUTImage caption, An image previously sent to the BBC by a migrant shows the housing tents on the island of Diego GarciaBy Alice CuddyBBC NewsA group of asylum seekers on an isolated British island territory have told UN investigators they feel unsafe and forgotten, as they reported sexual assaults and harassment of children, as well as self-harm and suicide attempts.Inspectors from the UN’s refugee agency visited Diego Garcia, in the Indian Ocean, to check on their welfare.A draft report says that conditions there amounted to arbitrary detention.The Foreign Office said the island was not suitable for migrants to live on.Other than the migrant camp, the island is used as a UK-US military base. Thousands of troops are stationed there, usually on a one-year deployment, along with a smaller number of military contractors. For all allegations of sexual assault and harassment, the alleged perpetrators were other asylum seekers.Civilian visitors are not allowed – and the island has officially had no resident population since the early 1970s when the UK relocated all the people living there so it could develop the base.The 61 people currently in the island camp are mostly Sri Lankan Tamils and the first of them landed on Diego Garcia in October 2021 after their boat ran into trouble while trying to sail to Canada, according to migrants and officials.Their subsequent asylum claims were the first ever to be launched on British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) – an area described as being “constitutionally distinct and separate from the UK”, and where the UK government argues that the refugee convention does not apply.In its response to the UN report on the asylum seekers, a Foreign Office spokeswoman said: “BIOT is not a suitable location for migrants, which is why we have been working tirelessly to process the migrants’ claims for protection and to find a suitable third country for those whose claims are upheld.”At all times, the welfare and safety of migrants on BIOT has been our top priority.”UNHCR – the UN Refugee Agency – says the visit by its inspectors in late November marked the first time an “external party” had gained access to the island to monitor conditions there since the asylum seekers’ arrival. The draft report it produced following its visit was released to the BBC by the supreme court of BIOT.Sexual violence likely ‘under-reported’During its visit, UNHCR representatives heard several allegations of sexual assault and harassment, with alleged victims including young children. In all instances, the alleged perpetrators were other asylum seekers, the report says.It adds that there was likely to be an “under-reporting” of sexual violence because of shame and stigma, and a view among asylum seekers that there would not be an effective response.”It was clear from speaking to asylum seekers, both the general population and those who had made allegations, that they did not see anything to be gained by reporting, both in terms of justice and safety, including due to the fact that alleged perpetrators of sexual assault remain living in the camp alongside alleged victims,” the report says.A decision made last July to designate family tents and single male tents was a “positive step” but “unlikely to be sufficient as a prevention mechanism”, it notes, adding that there was “little evidence of other preventive measures”.Full report: Migrants stuck in “hell” on UK military island (June 2023)UK to begin talks over future of Chagos Islands In the UN report, the asylum seekers on the island, which is hundreds of miles away from any other population, describe being bitten by rats in a fenced-off camp and say that they are only permitted to leave it under security escort, even if they just want to walk to the beach.That has led to feelings of despair and incidents of self-harm and suicide attempts, the UN’s draft report – one of the first detailed insights into conditions on the island – says.The group of asylum seekers, which includes 16 children, said they felt bored, depressed, and hopeless. Some said they felt “forgotten”, while one woman said: “Many of us think about ending our lives.” Some of the children told the inspectors they had witnessed violence and self-harm, and made multiple references to suicide during the UN visit, the draft report says.Some of them recalled a time when a security dog came to visit the camp and they watched it through the security fence. “The children said that it made them sad that the dog was able to be outside the fence and they were not,” the report says. Image source, HANDOUTImage caption, A photo, previously provided to the BBC, shows one of the groups of Tamils on their fishing boat, on which they intended to voyage to CanadaThe asylum seekers do not have access to the internet and have never met their lawyers in person. Until now, details of the conditions they are being held in have been scarce – recounted mainly in court hearings in the UK.A process has been established to determine if the group should be sent back to Sri Lanka or to a “safe third country”.The BBC last year established contact with multiple asylum seekers on the island, who described conditions there as hellish. UNHCR says it considers that the 61 Tamils on Diego Garcia are “subject to deprivation of liberty”.”They reside in a closed place with no possibility to leave at will, which amounts to detention under international law,” it explains. In its report, the UN agency says the conditions on the island “fail to provide the necessary standards of privacy, safety and dignity”.The draft report says asylum seekers are held in a fenced area of approximately 100m by 140m, and are barred from leaving unless with a security escort. Most of the children have never left the camp other than infrequent visits to the beach under security escort, the report says.Image caption, The island of Diego Garcia is a British overseas territory situated 6,000 miles from the UKThe children showed UN representatives pictures they had drawn depicting the wired fence surrounding the camp and said their lives generally consisted of eating meals with their families, walking to the education tent for classes and then returning to their own tent.”Living here is like living in hell,” a mother is quoted as saying. “Children go to bed late and in [the] night do not sleep because they do not feel at peace. And that is because the children feel that we as parents are not at peace.”The asylum seekers are given three meals a day, and do not have the option to cook their own food. UNHCR observers found the meals to be varied and nutritional, but asylum seekers complained that the meals were sometimes not culturally appropriate, and that they had no say in what they ate.’We think it may be better to die’The UN report describes a deterioration in mental health in the camp, and observers saw signs of clinical depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.The draft report says that while children in the camp appeared “playful and responsive” there were “worrying signs that living in an enclosed environment, in close proximity to adults who were suffering from poor mental health was having an impact on their emotional health”.”Children have witnessed violence and self-harm. They are aware that many of the adults, including in some cases their own parents, have tried to end their lives.”During the UN’s visit, one teenage girl asked a UNHCR representative: ‘”Do you think that if I kill myself, my brother and parents could go to another country where they would have a better life?”Image source, HANDOUTImage caption, At one point, a group of the migrants were sent to Rwanda for medical treatment – some of them were later returned to Diego GarciaAsylum seekers, including children, told the UN “they often feel their suffering is without end, and frequently consider the idea of purposely inflicting bodily harm or ending their life”.Medical services on the island reported 21 incidents of self-harm between May and October 2023.”I feel I am alive on the outside but dead from inside. My body hurts me, and if the pains will further increase, I may have to hurt myself to end this all,” one man said.Several people have been transferred to Rwanda – a 3,000-mile flight away – for medical care following self-harm and suicide attempts.If you are affected by the mental health issues raised in this story, the BBC Action Line provides support information here. Those who have had their claims for international protection approved are still waiting for a third country – where they can have a new life – to be identified.’Not a safe place’ UNHCR frequently heard concerns that asylum seekers felt they had been “forgotten” on the island and had “no way to speak up about their current conditions or perceived injustices”. The UN report acknowledges that the sudden arrival of asylum seekers on Diego Garcia presented “enormous challenges” and says “important efforts were pursued to ensure that those who wished to make international protection claims were able to do so” and that services such as medical care were made available. But, it says, the “existing situation is not tenable”.Its draft report calls for the asylum seekers to be “urgently relocated”, for final decisions on international protection to be expedited, and solutions secured for those whose claims are approved.It also calls for the UK government to conduct “contingency planning” for possible future arrivals on the island, and for an independent mechanism to be established to monitor the treatment of asylum seekers.One of the group’s lawyers, Tessa Gregory, from London firm Leigh Day, said she was “extremely concerned” about their wellbeing, describing conditions on the island as “appalling”.Lawyers had been denied access to visit their clients on the island, she added.The UK took control of the Chagos Islands, of which Diego Garcia is part, from its then colony, Mauritius, in 1965 and went on to evict its population of more than 1,000 people to make way for the base.Mauritius, which won independence from the UK in 1968, maintains the islands are its own and the UN’s’ highest court has ruled that the UK’s administration of the territory is “unlawful” and must end. UNHCR says its visit to the island does not constitute recognition of BIOT.Related TopicsChagos IslandsRefugees and asylum seekersSri LankaMore on this storyMigrants stuck in ‘hell’ on a remote UK military basePublished11 June 2023UK to begin talks over future of Chagos IslandsPublished3 November 2022Top StoriesLive. By-election losses came against ‘very difficult backdrop’, says Tory ministerNavalny’s team accuses Russia of ‘hiding’ his bodyPublished17 hours agoBiden assures Zelensky US will send $60bn in aidPublished1 hour agoFeaturesUN: Asylum seekers report assault and self-harm on remote UK islandWhat should you do if a dog attacks?Case of US sailor stirs unease over Japan military tiesWest Africa’s Michelin-starred cuisine wows LondonHow London Overground’s new line names were chosenThe Papers: Starmer ‘attacks Trump’ and ‘No way back for Harry’The Oscar-winning film that captured Navalny’s life and possible deathHow an Australian stuntwoman conquered Indian action filmsBafta Film Awards 2024: The nominees in fullElsewhere on the BBCHow are jelly beans made?Gregg Wallace visits a Dublin factory that makes over ten million of the sweets per day!AttributioniPlayerHair-pulling, wrestling and kicking!Watch the moment a violent brawl unfolded in the Maldives ParliamentAttributioniPlayerA billionaire’s playground…What is it really like in the boom town of Mumbai?AttributioniPlayerCould this Italian dream turn into a real nightmare?Amanda Holden and Alan Carr don their boiler suits to renovate a dilapidated house in TuscanyAttributioniPlayerMost Read1A US soldier killed two at Mount Fuji. So why must Japan apologise?2What should you do if a dog attacks?3Conjoined twins given days to live are proving world wrong4Starmer ‘attacks Trump’ and ‘No way back for Harry’5Last orders for Westminster pub bells calling MPs to vote6Steve Wright had been feeling unwell, says friend7No discussion over Falklands, says Lord Cameron8Biden assures Zelensky US will send $60bn in aid9Asylum seekers feel unsafe on remote UK island10Barbenheimer and ball gowns: All you need to know for the Baftas](https://newsinsightplus.com/wp-content/uploads/https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/branded_news/A48B/production/_130032124_dg_tents2.jpg)
