BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityScience & EnvironmentCern: Scientists search for mysterious ghost particlesPublished1 hour agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, VICTOR de SCHWANBERG/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARYImage caption, Artwork: Ghost particles can’t currently be detectedBy Pallab GhoshScience correspondentSome physicists have long suspected that mysterious ‘ghost’ particles in the world around us could greatly advance our understanding of the true nature of the Universe.Now scientists think they’ve found a way to prove whether or not they exist.Europe’s centre for particle research, Cern, has approved an experiment designed to find evidence for them.The new instrument will be a thousand times more sensitive to such particles than previous devices.It will smash particles into a hard surface to detect them instead of against each other like Cern’s main device the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).New atom-smasher could spark physics revolutionScientists closer to solving mystery of antimatterAstronomers crack 37-year cosmic ‘murder mystery’So what are these ghostly particles and why was a new approach needed to detect them?The current theory of particle physics is called the Standard Model. It says that everything in the Universe is made up of a family of 17 particles – well known ones such as the electron and the Higgs boson – as well as the lesser known but wonderfully named charm quark, tau neutrino and gluon.Some are mixed up in different combinations to make up the larger, but still incredibly small, particles that make up the world around us, as well as the stars and galaxies we see in space, while others are involved in the forces of nature.But there’s a problem: astronomers have noticed things in the heavens – the way galaxies move, for example – that strongly suggest that all that we can observe makes up just five per cent of the Universe.Some, or even all the rest of the Universe, could be made up of the ‘ghost’ or ‘hidden’ particles. They are thought to be phantom doppelgangers of the 17 particles of the Standard Model.If they exist, they are really hard to detect because they very rarely interact with the world we know. Like ghosts, they pass straight through everything, and can’t be detected by any earthly device.But the theory is that the ghost particles can disintegrate into Standard Model particles, and these can be picked up by detectors.Instead of colliding particles together, which most current experiments do, the Search for Hidden Particles (SHiP) will crash them into a big block of material. This means that all the particles are smashed into smaller bits – rather than some of them. The diagram below shows why this ‘fixed target’ approach is so much more effective.Image source, BBC NewsThe project’s ghostbuster-in-chief, Prof Andrey Golutvin of Imperial College London said that the experiment “marks a new era in the search for hidden particles”.”SHiP has the unique possibility to solve several of the major problems of particle physics, and we have the prospect of discovering particles that have never been seen before,” he said.The hunt for ghost particles requires specially adapted equipment.With normal experiments, using the Large Hadron Collider, for example, new particles can be detected up to a metre from the collision. But the ghost particles can remain invisible and travel several tens or even hundreds of meters before they disintegrate and reveal themselves. So SHiP’s detectors are placed much further away.’We are explorers’Prof Mitesh Patel of Imperial College described the new approach as “ingenious”.”What really appeals to me about the experiment is that these particles are right under our noses, but we have never been able to see them because of the way they interact, or rather the way they don’t interact.”We are explorers, and we believe that we can see something interesting in this new terrain. So, we have to take a look.”SHiP will be built within existing facilities at Cern, according to Dr Claudia Ahdida, a physicist at Cern.”We will be making use of an existing cavern and infrastructure and parts that we will try and re-use as much as possible and what we will have is a facility that will help us search for this hidden sector, which has not been seen before,” she said.SHiP will run alongside all of Cern’s other experiments, the largest of which is the Large Hadron Collider, which has been searching for the missing 95% of the Universe since it was completed in 2008 at a cost of £3.75bn. So far it hasn’t found any non-Standard Model particles, and so the plan is to build a machine that is three times larger and much more powerful.The Future Circular Collider has an estimated initial cost of £12bn. Its planned start date is sometime in the mid-2040s, though it won’t be at its full new particle-hunting potential until 2070.By contrast, the SHiP experiment is scheduled to start looking for new particles in 2030 and will be around a hundred times cheaper at around £100m. But researchers say that all approaches are needed to explore all the possible options in order to find the particles that they say would lead to one of the biggest breakthroughs in physics of all time.Follow Pallab on X, formerly known as Twitter.Inside the atom-smasherPallab Ghosh and Kate Stephens go inside the biggest particle accelerator in the world to find out why scientists want an even larger one.Available now on BBC iPlayerRelated TopicsPhysicsParticle physicsMore on this storyNew atom-smasher could spark physics revolutionPublished5 FebruaryScientists close in on fifth force of naturePublished10 August 2023Related Internet LinksCernThe BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.Top StoriesRussia charges four men over Moscow concert attackPublished1 hour agoRosenberg: As Russia mourns, how will Putin react to concert attack?Published2 hours agoTriple lock for pensions stays if we win election, says HuntPublished11 hours agoFeaturesIs now the time Palestinian politics can start afresh?Did Russia ignore US ‘extremist’ attacks warning?The Brazilian teen who scored winner against EnglandAttributionSportYour pictures on the theme of ‘reflections’‘Having a certificate of loss proves my baby existed’Kate cancer diagnosis rewrites story of past weeksSimon Harris – the man on the brink of Irish history England kits ‘should connect people’From the desert to the icy waters of WalesElsewhere on the BBCWhy do people behave the way they do on social media?Marianna Spring investigates extraordinary cases of online hate to find out…AttributioniPlayerCritically acclaimed and utterly compelling…Masterful, claustrophobic drama starring Sofie Gråbøl as a troubled prison guardAttributioniPlayerFrom triumph to tragedy…After more than 30 years of service, America’s space shuttle took to the skies for the last timeAttributioniPlayerCan new evidence solve aviation’s greatest mystery?Ten years after the Malaysian Airlines flight disappeared, new technology may explain whyAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Russia charges four men over Moscow concert attack2Passenger overboard from cruise ship, firm says3Murder arrest at Heathrow after man hit by car4The Jewish settlers who want to build homes in Gaza5Scientists to hunt mysterious ‘ghost’ particles6Rosenberg: As Russia mourns, how will Putin react to concert attack?7Avanti to pay train drivers £600 a shift for overtime8’China hack attack’ and ‘UK nuclear defence boost’9Boy, 12, charged with attempted murder10Tony Blackburn hangs up his local radio headphones

[ad_1] Physicists believe a new experiment could prove their existence and answer fundamental questions about our Universe.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaMexico poll frontrunner Claudia Sheinbaum deluged with hate messagesPublished14 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, ReutersBy Nadia RagozhinaBBC NewsMexico’s presidential frontrunner says she is being flooded with hate-filled messages after her phone number was published on social media. Claudia Sheinbaum is the governing party’s candidate in June’s election. One of the president’s sons has also had his private number leaked online, and said it put his family in danger. President Andrés Manuel López Obrador blamed political opponents, but days earlier he publicly revealed a journalist’s phone number. Posting on X, formerly Twitter, Ms Sheinbaum said she was being deluged with hate calls and messages. “What they want to do is obvious, once again their attacks are as crude as they are harmless,” she said. The former mayor of Mexico City faces Xóchitl Gálvez, from the opposition coalition, and Jorge Álvarez Máynez of the Citizens’ Movement party in the June poll.Mr López Obrador is not able to seek re-election because Mexican presidents are limited to a single six-year term.Ms Sheinbaum, a 61-year-old trained scientist, is a close ally of the leftist president and is currently leading the polls. She officially entered the race last week by submitting her registration papers.Jose Ramon López Beltrán, the president’s eldest son, has also had his phone number leaked. He described the publication of his number as “vengeance”. Mr López Obrador described the leak of his son’s phone number as “shameful”.The privacy violation for Claudia Sheinbaum comes days after the president himself publicly read out the phone number of a New York Times journalist, who was investigating alleged links to drug cartels among Mr López Obrador’s associates. The president hit back at criticism of his decision to reveal the journalist’s phone number, denying that he had breached data protection regulations. The New York Times described the incident as “a troubling and unacceptable tactic from a world leader at a time when threats against journalists are on the rise”.Related TopicsMexico CityAndres Manuel Lopez ObradorMexicoMore on this storyMexico closer to electing first woman presidentPublished7 September 2023Top StoriesDeputy PM declines to say whether MP’s remarks were IslamophobicPublished2 hours agoTrump easily wins South Carolina but Haley fights onPublished11 hours agoIsrael mulls ceasefire plan as progress reportedPublished1 hour agoFeaturesThe converted landmark buildings given new lifeIn pictures: Celebrating the Lantern FestivalDissent is dangerous in Putin’s Russia, but activists refuse to give upThe winners and nominees at the SAG AwardsKim Petras on sexual liberation and fighting TikTokInside the long-abandoned tunnel beneath the ClydeHow a £525 bet gave birth to your morning commuteThe man who tried to eat every animal on Earth. VideoThe man who tried to eat every animal on EarthAfter 1,250 years women join Japan’s (nearly) naked festivalElsewhere on the BBCFancy a film tonight?There’s something for everyone on BBC iPlayerAttributioniPlayerHair-pulling, wrestling and kicking!Watch the moment a violent brawl unfolded in the Maldives ParliamentAttributioniPlayerHow close are we to nuclear Armageddon?The Doomsday Clock is the closest it’s ever been to midnight – Jane Corbin investigatesAttributioniPlayerHow are jelly beans made?Gregg Wallace visits a Dublin factory that makes over ten million of the sweets per day!AttributioniPlayerMost Read1Police search for boy missing at lake2Inside the long-abandoned tunnel beneath the Clyde3After 1,250 years women join Japan’s (nearly) naked festival4Dowden silent on whether MP’s remarks Islamophobic5Israel mulls ceasefire plan as progress reported6How a £525 bet gave birth to your morning commute7Dissent is dangerous in Putin’s Russia, but activists refuse to give up8The converted landmark buildings given new life9The blind Ukrainian amputee whose wife’s voice kept him alive10Trump easily wins South Carolina but Haley fights on

[ad_1] Claudia Sheinbaum, a close ally of President López Obrador, has had her phone number leaked online.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaMexico protesters in mass rally against electoral changesPublished6 hours agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, EPA-EFE/REX/ShutterstockImage caption, Protesters filled Mexico City’s historic Zocalo SquareHuge crowds have rallied in Mexico’s capital, protesting against proposed changes to the electoral authority ahead of June’s presidential elections.The Mexico City government said some 90,000 people turned out in the city’s Zocalo Square. The rally organisers said the figure was much higher.The opposition accuses President Andrés Manuel López Obrador of trying to weaken the National Electoral Institute – an autonomous, non-partisan body.He says the INE is biased and corrupt.Since his victory in the 2018 presidential elections, Mr López Obrador has been pushing for a reform of the INE, which he says will save taxpayers $150m (£119m) a year by drastically reducing the agency’s staff.Sunday’s demonstration in the capital’s historic square is the latest such protest in Mexico in recent years.”We do not want our autonomous institutions to be attacked, we want to defend our democracy, we want the INE… to be independent, and we want our president to keep his hands off the election,” demonstrator Diana Arnaiz was quoted as saying by the AFP news agency.Maria de Jesus Torres, who also attended the rally, said: “We are millions of Mexicans who are against this government and I am coming out for my children and grandchildren.”Mr López Obrador is not able to seek re-election because Mexican presidents are limited to a single six-year term. He is supporting former Mexico City Mayor Claudia Sheinbaum, who is currently leading the opinion polls.Ms Sheinbaum, a member of his ruling Morena party, on Sunday officially entered the race by submitting her registration papers.Related TopicsMexico CityAndres Manuel Lopez ObradorMexicoMore on this storyHuge crowds march in Mexico over electoral reformPublished27 February 2023Mexico passes controversial electoral reformPublished23 February 2023Mexico Congress votes to keep military on streetsPublished13 October 2022Mexico’s governing party captures four more statesPublished6 June 2022Mexico leader’s electricity reform defeatedPublished18 April 2022Top StoriesSpecial forces blocked elite Afghan troops from relocating to UKPublished5 hours agoBaby was among three children found dead Published33 minutes agoIsrael indicates deadline for offensive in RafahPublished10 hours agoFeaturesWatch Baftas 2024 best bits… in two minutes. VideoWatch Baftas 2024 best bits… in two minutesMichael J Fox brings audience to tears at BaftasThe Papers: ‘Schools phone ban’ and Kremlin ‘covering tracks”Hearing my children’s laughter is like torture’Matt Smith on a Doctor Who return… and Prince Harry. VideoMatt Smith on a Doctor Who return… and Prince HarryAfrica’s ‘flying presidents’ under fire for foreign trips‘Without painkillers, we leave patients to scream for hours’The Oscar-winning film that captured Navalny’s life and future deathWhat should you do if a dog attacks?Elsewhere on the BBC’You have to get it out of your system and say ‘cancer”Stephen Fry joins Amol and Nick to highlight the importance of talking about the diseaseAttributionSoundsWill this elite boarding school fit around them?Five black inner-city teens must leave their old worlds…AttributioniPlayer’I fell and tried to keep running’John recalls the time he got injured whilst racing against someone in fancy dressAttributionSoundsFrom chewing sticks to rice-based toilet paper…What did people do before everyday items were invented?AttributionBitesizeMost Read1Baby among three children found dead in house2Special forces stopped Afghan troops settling in UK3Baftas 2024: A dog, tears and Murder on the Dancefloor4Right to roam countryside ‘closed off’ to walkers5Michael J Fox brings audience to tears at Baftas6Currys takeover battle looms as JD.com eyes bid7Search for boy, 2, who fell into river continues8Ofcom rejects Brewdog complaint over BBC documentary9’Hearing my children’s laughter is like torture’10Schools given new guidance on stopping phone use

[ad_1] At least 90,000 throng central Mexico City, accusing the president of trying to undermine the top electoral body.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaTrump provided a rapid-fire testimony in New York defamation trialPublished32 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesBy Brandon Livesay and Nada TawfikReporting from court in New YorkDonald Trump has testified in the defamation trial brought by writer E Jean Carroll, but his much-anticipated time on the stand was kept brief.The civil trial focuses on defamatory comments Mr Trump made about Ms Carroll in 2019 while in the White House.He was found liable of sexually assaulting Ms Carroll in the 1990s, though he continues to deny the attack.But it is for that reason, the court had to spend much time debating the scope of his testimony on Thursday.Judge Lewis Kaplan, who is overseeing the case, insisted that the former president limit the topics he discussed on the stand, since a separate trial found him liable of sexually assaulting Ms Carroll. That resulted in the judge and lawyers spending much more time arguing about what Mr Trump would be allowed to talk about than, compared to his four minutes of testimony. Judge Kaplan said the first trial established the facts and the only issue remaining was how much Mr Trump must pay Carroll, if anything. He left no room for the current Republican presidential frontrunner to go beyond the agreed terms, making it impossible for him to launch into a monologue or to campaign from the witness stand.It’s perhaps a lesson learned from one of Mr Trump’s other legal battles, of which there are many. In a New York civil fraud trial earlier this month, Mr Trump was initially told he could not give his closing argument. The judge in that case asked whether Mr Trump would keep it short and stick to the matters of the case.Mr Trump responded by launching into a six-minute monologue that included claims he was a victim of political persecution. The defamation trial on Thursday gave the 77-year-old a far shorter leash. He was asked if he stood by his deposition, he said: “100% yes”.His lawyer Alina Habba then asked if he denied Ms Carroll’s accusation – “that’s exactly right, Yes I did,” he responded. He went on to say “she said something that I considered a false accusation — totally false.” But Judge Kaplan quickly cut Mr Trump off and told the jury to ignore that last statement.Finally, Ms Habba asked if her client had ever instructed anyone to hurt Ms Carroll, to which Mr Trump said: “No, I just wanted to defend myself, my family and frankly, the presidency.” The judge again ordered the latter part stricken from the record.E Jean Carroll trial: Judge threatens to remove Trump from courtJury finds Trump sexually abused writer in NY storeAnd with that, the testimony was over, but by no means was Mr Trump done speaking his mind. As he gruffly left the courtroom, a reporter with WCBS heard Mr Trump complaining: “It’s not America. This is not America”.Earlier in the day, Judge Kaplan warned him to stop interrupting proceedings by “talking loudly”. That included a moment when he was heard muttering under his breath that he had “never met this woman (Carroll)”.Image source, ReutersImage caption, Trump looks on as his lawyer Alina Habba questions former New York TV news anchor Carol MartinBut it’s somewhat familiar territory when watching one of Mr Trump’s trials. While in court, he has often tested its limits and taken significant legal risks.Testifying outside of the limitations outlined by the judge on Thursday could have theoretically caused Mr Trump to face hefty fines or even five years in prison for perjury.But playing by his own rules is keeping Mr Trump’s base invested and tuned into his many legal troubles. And more importantly, it’s leading to considerable press coverage at a particularly important time for the politician. After the New Hampshire primary brought him another significant win, the former New York real estate mogul appears set to become the Republican presidential nominee. But that may well be why his behaviour is unlikely to change: It has proved to be a key aspect of his winning campaign.Ronnell Andersen Jones, a professor of law at the University of Utah, told BBC News that this case shows the “wide gap” between Mr Trump’s strategies in court and on the campaign trail.While the former president and his lawyers may want to convince the jury that his comments in the White House did not show “ill will that warrants punitive damages”, that is easier said than done considering his actions. “This will be a hard row to hoe, given that this same jury is daily receiving new evidence that the defendant, outside the courtroom, continues to spread the lie undeterred,” Ms Jones said.The defamation trial will resume on Friday at 09:30 ET (14:30 GMT) with closing arguments. It is not yet known if Mr Trump will attend.Related TopicsNew York CityUS & CanadaDonald TrumpMore on this storyTrump ‘unleashed’ followers on Carroll, says lawyerPublished17 JanuaryHow big are Donald Trump’s legal problems?Published20 December 2023Top StoriesFamilies’ anger as triple killer gets hospital orderPublished54 minutes agoWatch: Killer’s rampage and arrest caught on camera. VideoWatch: Killer’s rampage and arrest caught on cameraPublished10 hours agoUK ends Canada trade talks over beef rulesPublished31 minutes agoFeaturesCould the UK’s ‘pre-war generation’ become a citizen army?Downed Russian plane leaves unanswered questionsWhy a key crime stat doesn’t tell the full story about sexual offencesThe secrets of Claudia Winkleman’s Traitors styleHow many countries still have the death penalty?UK to loan back Ghana’s looted ‘crown jewels’The crime hotspot helping ex-offenders go straightPostcode check: How’s the NHS coping in your area?Chris Mason: Has Sunak seen off latest Tory wobbles?Elsewhere on the BBCCan you guess what’s happening in an advert you can’t see?Chris McCausland asks a panel of comedians to live in an audio only worldAttributionSoundsHow did Britain lead the world into the jet age?An unlikely story of outstanding aviation achievement at a time of national austerityAttributioniPlayer’Comedy saved my life’First broadcast in 2010, hear Frank Skinner’s desert island picks and personal revelationsAttributionSoundsThe mysterious deaths of Nazi fugitivesThree brothers investigate whether a family connection may explain the truthAttributioniPlayerMost Read1BBC defends Dragons’ Den after ME criticism2UK ends Canada trade talks over beef rules3Police took father to hospital weeks before deaths4Mars crash ends Nasa helicopter Ingenuity’s mission5Abandoned baby leaves hospital with foster parents6Families’ anger as triple killer gets hospital order7Baby kept in Lidl bag before being dumped, court told8Post Office told workers to pay back robbery losses9Could the UK’s ‘pre-war generation’ become a citizen army?10Sturgeon called Johnson a ‘clown’, inquiry hears

[ad_1] Finally, Ms Habba asked if her client had ever instructed anyone to hurt Ms Carroll, to which Mr Trump said: “No, I just wanted to defend myself, my family…

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaBritish man acquitted over London-Spain flight bomb hoaxPublished31 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, EPAImage caption, Aditya Verma (R)’s one-day trial at Spain’s National Court took place earlier this weekBy Sam HancockBBC NewsA Spanish court has cleared a British man of public disorder, after he joked to friends about blowing up a flight from London Gatwick to Menorca.Aditya Verma admitted he told friends in July 2022: “On my way to blow up the plane. I’m a member of the Taliban.”But he said he had made the joke in a private Snapchat group and never intended to “cause public distress”.A judge in Madrid ruled that “no explosive… was found that would lead one to believe it was a real threat”.Mr Verma’s trial, held at the National Court in the Spanish capital, took place on Monday – a year-and-a-half after the incident took place.The message he sent to friends, before boarding the plane, went on to be picked up by UK security services. They then flagged it to Spanish authorities while the easyJet plane was still in the air.Two Spanish F-18 fighter jets were sent to flank the aircraft. One followed the plane until it landed at Menorca, where the plane was searched.Mr Verma, who was 18 at the time, was arrested and held in a Spanish police cell for two days. He was later released on bail.A judge ruled earlier that Mr Verma, of Orpington, Kent, should be cleared of any wrongdoing.If he had been found guilty, the university student faced a fine of up to €22,500 (£19,300) and a further €95,000 in expenses to cover the cost of the jets being scrambled. Image source, Marcus Torr/ReutersImage caption, One of the two Spanish F18 fighters seen through the window of the easyJet flight from London to MenorcaA key question in the case was how the message got out, considering Snapchat is an encrypted app. One theory, raised in the trial, was that it could have been intercepted via Gatwick’s Wi-Fi network. But a spokesperson for the airport told BBC News that its network “does not have that capability”.In the judge’s resolution, cited by the Europa Press news agency, it was said that the message, “for unknown reasons, was captured by the security mechanisms of England when the plane was flying over French airspace”.The message was made “in a strictly private environment between the accused and his friends with whom he flew, through a private group to which only they have access, so the accused could not even remotely assume… that the joke he played on his friends could be intercepted or detected by the British services, nor by third parties other than his friends who received the message,” the judgement added. It was not immediately clear how UK authorities were alerted to the message, with the judge noting “they were not the subject of evidence in this trial”.A spokesperson for Snapchat said the social media platform would not “comment on what’s happened in this individual case”.On its website, in a section titled “How We Work with Law Enforcement Authorities”, Snapchat says one of its goals is to “maintain a safe and fun environment where Snapchatters are free to express themselves and stay in touch with their real friends”.It adds: “We also work to proactively escalate to law enforcement any content appearing to involve imminent threats to life, such as school shooting threats, bomb threats and missing persons cases, and respond to law enforcement’s emergency requests for disclosure of data when law enforcement is handling a case involving an imminent threat to life. “In the case of emergency disclosure requests from law enforcement, our 24/7 team usually responds within 30 minutes.”Additional reporting by Laura Gozzi and Monica SorianoRelated TopicsSpainMadridGatwick AirportMore on this storyBriton in Madrid court over Snapchat plane-bomb hoaxPublished3 days agoTop StoriesFamilies’ anger as triple killer gets hospital orderPublished18 minutes agoWatch: Killer’s rampage and arrest caught on camera. VideoWatch: Killer’s rampage and arrest caught on cameraPublished6 hours agoPolice took father to hospital weeks before deathsPublished36 minutes agoFeaturesCould the UK’s ‘pre-war generation’ become a citizen army?Downed Russian plane leaves unanswered questionsWhy a key crime stat doesn’t tell the full story about sexual offencesThe secrets of Claudia Winkleman’s Traitors styleHow many countries still have the death penalty?UK to loan back Ghana’s looted ‘crown jewels’The crime hotspot helping ex-offenders go straightPostcode check: How’s the NHS coping in your area?Chris Mason: Has Sunak seen off latest Tory wobbles?Elsewhere on the BBCCan you guess what’s happening in an advert you can’t see?Chris McCausland asks a panel of comedians to live in an audio only worldAttributionSoundsHow did Britain lead the world into the jet age?An unlikely story of outstanding aviation achievement at a time of national austerityAttributioniPlayer’Comedy saved my life’First broadcast in 2010, hear Frank Skinner’s desert island picks and personal revelationsAttributionSoundsThe mysterious deaths of Nazi fugitivesThree brothers investigate whether a family connection may explain the truthAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Tom Holland bonus sent to Tom Hollander in error2Families’ anger as triple killer gets hospital order3Abandoned baby leaves hospital with foster parents4Baby kept in Lidl bag before being dumped, court told5NHS consultants reject offer of double pay rise6Sturgeon called Johnson a ‘clown’, inquiry hears7Russian ‘ultra-patriot’ jailed after insulting Putin8Could the UK’s ‘pre-war generation’ become a citizen army?9Microsoft lays off 1,900 gaming division staff10Apple to allow rival app stores on iPhones in EU

[ad_1] The message was made “in a strictly private environment between the accused and his friends with whom he flew, through a private group to which only they have access,…

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaIgor Girkin shot down a passenger jet, then insulted Putin. Which one put him in jail?Published1 hour agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsWar in UkraineImage source, MAXIM SHIPENKOV/EPA-EFE/REX/ShutterstockImage caption, Igor Girkin has escaped justice for downing flight MH17 but is going to jail after criticising Vladimir PutinBy Steve RosenbergRussia Editor, MoscowThe last time I saw Igor Girkin was five years ago in the stairwell of a Moscow news agency.”Would you consider giving me an interview?” I asked. “No,” he replied sharply and scurried away.I saw him again today. No stairwell. This time, Girkin was in a caged dock surrounded by police in the Moscow City Court. Along with other media we were allowed in to film him for just one minute before the end of his trial. A police dog kept barking. Girkin found that amusing. The verdict less so. Minutes later he was found guilty on extremism charges and sentenced to four years in a penal colony. This wasn’t his first conviction. In The Hague in 2022, in absentia, Girkin was found guilty of the murder of 298 people: the passengers and crew of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17. The Boeing jet had been shot down over eastern Ukraine in 2014 by Russian-controlled forces in the early stages of Russia’s war there. Girkin was one of three men sentenced to life imprisonment. A judgement he ignored.A year after we’d met in the stairwell, I managed to get through to Girkin on the phone and ask him about the Hague. “I do not recognise the authority of the Dutch court on this matter,” he told me. “I am a military man and I am not going to accept that a civilian court in a foreign country has the authority to convict a person who took part in someone else’s civil war, only because their civilians were killed.”Do you know who shot down [the plane]?””The rebels didn’t shoot down the Boeing. I have nothing more to say.”This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Russian rebel commander Igor Girkin told the BBC in 2020 he did not recognise the court’s authority”If it wasn’t the rebels, then was it Russian soldiers?” I asked.”That’s it. Goodbye.” He hung up. Now he is going to prison. But not for mass murder. And not for life. So, who exactly is Girkin – also known under his pseudonym as Igor Strelkov – and why has a Moscow court sent him to jail?He is a former FSB officer in Russia’s domestic security service. In 2014 he played a key role in the fighting in Ukraine’s Donbas region: a conflict engineered and orchestrated by Moscow.He organised and commanded pro-Russia militias in eastern Ukraine. The Dutch court would later rule that Russia had been in control of the separatist forces fighting in eastern Ukraine and that Girkin had helped to bring the Buk missile system into Ukraine that was used to shoot down flight MH17. Three guilty of downing airliner over UkrainePutin critic Girkin wants Russia presidential runFollowing Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, ultranationalist Girkin became a prominent pro-war blogger. He became increasingly critical of the way the Russian authorities were waging the war: not hard enough, in his view. He founded a hard line nationalist movement called The Club of Angry Patriots. His problems began when he started to take that anger out on President Vladimir Putin. Public criticisms of the Russian president turned to insults. In a post last year, Girkin described Putin as “a non-entity” and “a cowardly waste of space”. A few days later he was arrested. Now he’s been tried and convicted. Of course, a four-year prison sentence is mild in comparison to other recent punishments delivered by Russian courts. Last year pro-democracy activist Vladimir Kara-Murza was sentenced to a quarter of a century behind bars after being convicted of treason, a case he and his supporters insist was politically motivated.Putin critic jailed for 25 years in Russia’Send back our husbands’ – Russian women in rare protestHow would the “Angry Patriots” react to Girkin’s prison term? Would they pour on to the streets in protest? Image source, MAXIM SHIPENKOV/EPA-EFE/REX/ShutterstockImage caption, Some of Girkin supporters were detained outside the court in MoscowNot exactly. A few dozen supporters gathered outside the Moscow City Court to chant “Freedom to Strelkov!” but there was little hint of optimism in their voices. “They’ve put a Russian national patriot on trial,” Denis tells me. “I hope our people wake up and fight. Unfortunately, we don’t see much pushback. Everyone seems to be hiding away.”Also in the crowd was retired colonel and outspoken ultranationalist Vladimir Kvachkov.Having informed me that “Russia will always be the enemy of the Anglo-Saxon West” and assured me that the break-up of the United Kingdom was inevitable, Mr Kvachkov claimed that Girkin was being punished for “fighting against the system.”In recent years the “system” concentrated on clearing the Russian political landscape of pro-democracy, pro-Western critics and challengers. A prison sentence for Girkin suggests the Russian authorities have now decided to crackdown on critics from the opposite end of spectrum: the so-called ultra-patriots. Last year’s mutiny by Wagner mercenaries led by Yevgeny Prigozhin may be the reason. The Putin system survived the challenge. But that drama will have alerted the Kremlin to the potential dangers from highly motivated nationalistic and patriotic elements in Russian society.Related TopicsWar in UkraineRussiaVladimir PutinMore on this storyPutin critic Girkin wants Russia presidential runPublished19 November 2023Pro-war Putin critic Strelkov detained in MoscowPublished21 July 2023Wanted Russian rebel scorns MH17 trial. Video, 00:01:25Wanted Russian rebel scorns MH17 trialPublished9 March 20201:25Top StoriesFamilies’ anger as triple killer gets hospital orderPublished24 minutes agoWatch: Killer’s rampage and arrest caught on camera. VideoWatch: Killer’s rampage and arrest caught on cameraPublished4 hours agoSturgeon called Johnson a ‘clown’, inquiry hearsPublished28 minutes agoFeaturesCould the UK’s ‘pre-war generation’ become a citizen army?Downed Russian plane leaves unanswered questionsWhy a key crime stat doesn’t tell the full story about sexual offencesThe secrets of Claudia Winkleman’s Traitors styleHow many countries still have the death penalty?UK to loan back Ghana’s looted ‘crown jewels’The crime hotspot helping ex-offenders go straightPostcode check: How’s the NHS coping in your area?Chris Mason: Has Sunak seen off latest Tory wobbles?Elsewhere on the BBCCan you guess what’s happening in an advert you can’t see?Chris McCausland asks a panel of comedians to live in an audio only worldAttributionSoundsHow did Britain lead the world into the jet age?An unlikely story of outstanding aviation achievement at a time of national austerityAttributioniPlayer’Comedy saved my life’First broadcast in 2010, hear Frank Skinner’s desert island picks and personal revelationsAttributionSoundsThe mysterious deaths of Nazi fugitivesThree brothers investigate whether a family connection may explain the truthAttributioniPlayerMost Read1NHS consultants reject offer of double pay rise2Families’ anger as triple killer gets hospital order3Tom Holland bonus sent to Tom Hollander in error4Baby kept in Lidl bag before being dumped, court told5Foreign Office warns man running length of Africa6Microsoft lays off 1,900 gaming division staff7Sturgeon called Johnson a ‘clown’, inquiry hears8Lloyds to cut 1,600 jobs in major branch overhaul9Russian ‘ultra-patriot’ jailed after insulting Putin10Could the UK’s ‘pre-war generation’ become a citizen army?

[ad_1] Igor Girkin escaped justice for downing flight MH17 but goes to jail after criticising Russia’s leader.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaFrench police officer cleared of insulting sex crime victimPublished44 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesImage caption, The policeman in question was suspended for four months before being transferredA French policeman who called a female sexual assault complainant a “whore” has been let off by a police court.The incident happened in February 2022 when the woman filed her complaint at a Paris police station.The officer later rang her and left a voicemail message about paperwork but his insults were accidentally recorded after he thought he had hung up. The case sparked criticism about the way victims of sexual abuse are treated by police in France. During the hearing, the court was to asked consider that the officer made the insults to himself or to his colleagues, and that they were not aimed directly at the woman. It was requested that the officer be acquitted or be given an exemption due to his previous exemplary record. A female judge ruled that the comments had not amounted to a sexist insult and acquitted the officer.The woman’s lawyer, Arie Alimi, told the AFP news agency that her client would appeal.”The judiciary continues to protect police officers,” she said.The officer, who was suspended for four months and then transferred, apologised to the woman during the trail – saying he was “really sorry” she heard the “unfortunate comments”.He also said that he had to beg Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin to keep his job.Mr Darmanin was among those to express outrage over the case, saying at the time it came to light that the officer no longer had a place in the police.He told the Europe 1 radio station in February 2022 that the man had “smeared all the women who try to file a complaint, when it is in our best interest to tell them to come to the police stations to do so”.Mr Darmanin also said the officer had also “dirtied and spat on the uniform of the Republic and his 250,000 other police and gendarme colleagues”. The woman’s original assault complaint is being investigated, French media group bfmtv reported.Related TopicsEuropeFranceParisMore on this storyFeminists criticise Macron over defence of DepardieuPublished21 December 2023Ex-models demand change over French sex abuse lawsPublished15 September 2021Top StoriesFamilies’ anger as triple killer gets hospital orderPublished49 minutes agoWatch: Killer’s rampage and arrest caught on camera. VideoWatch: Killer’s rampage and arrest caught on cameraPublished2 hours agoLive. Sturgeon had ‘tighter cast list’ on some Covid decisions – Humza YousafFeaturesDowned Russian plane leaves unanswered questionsWhy a key crime stat doesn’t tell the full story about sexual offencesThe secrets of Claudia Winkleman’s Traitors styleHow many countries still have the death penalty?UK to loan back Ghana’s looted ‘crown jewels’The crime hotspot helping ex-offenders go straightPostcode check: How’s the NHS coping in your area?Chris Mason: Has Sunak seen off latest Tory wobbles?Why do people in Wales celebrate Saint Dwynwen’s day?Elsewhere on the BBCFrom ancient China to Hollywood movies…Greg is joined by comedian Phil Wang to learn all about the surprising history of kung fuAttributionSoundsOne of Scotland’s most notorious unsolved murders…With unprecedented courtroom access, see the case finally brought to trialAttributioniPlayer’Comedy saved my life’First broadcast in 2010, hear Frank Skinner’s desert island picks and personal revelationsAttributionSoundsThe mysterious deaths of Nazi fugitivesThree brothers investigate whether a family connection may explain the truthAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Tom Holland bonus sent to Tom Hollander in error2Families’ anger as triple killer gets hospital order3Foreign Office warns man running length of Africa4Reckless parents led to baby’s death, court told5Judge proposes Rubiales trial for World Cup kiss6Virgin most-complained about broadband provider7Russian woman jailed for 27 years for cafe killing8DJ who urinated on cancer patient at club jailed9Elba warns over mandatory jail for carrying knife10Sub-postmistress cleared after years of suffering

[ad_1] Female victim’s lawyer says she will appeal after male officer acquitted by a police court.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaDarya Trepova: Russian woman jailed for 27 years for cafe bomb killingPublished55 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsWar in UkraineImage source, ReutersImage caption, Trepova said she thought the statuette which killed Tatarsky contained a listening device, not a bombRussian woman Darya Trepova has been sentenced to 27 years in jail for the killing of pro-war blogger Vladlen Tatarsky last April.Tatarsky was killed by a bomb in a statuette Trepova gave him, as he was about to give a talk in St Petersburg. Dozens were injured in the blast.Trepova, 26, denied the charges, saying she thought the statuette contained a listening device. She said she had acted on the orders of a Ukrainian contact, and was set up.The sentence is one of the harshest imposed on a woman in Russia’s history.The attack on Tatarsky, 40, (real name Maxim Fomin) happened on 2 April, 2023. Trepova was charged with “a terrorist act carried out by an organised group causing intentional death” and the “illegal possession of explosive devices by an organised group”.Russian investigators have accused Ukraine of being behind the attack, and Ukrainian officials have neither confirmed nor denied this.What we know about detained cafe blast suspectWhat clues does new Russian bomb footage reveal?Who are Russia’s war bloggers and why are they popular?But Trepova gave evidence in court that she was following orders from a man in Ukraine known as Gestalt (German for “shape”). His identity is not known.She said she made contact with him via Ukraine-based journalist Roman Popkov. She is opposed to Russia’s war in Ukraine and had been seeking to go there to work as a journalist.Trepova said that under Gestalt’s instruction she gained Tatarsky’s trust, introducing herself to him as an art student named Anastasia Kriulina and attending his talks.In March Gestalt sent her the statuette, she said, assuring her that it contained a wiretap and a tracker. She said she expressed concern that it might contain a bomb.”I feel great pain and shame that my gullibility and my naivety led to such catastrophic consequences. I didn’t want to hurt anyone,” Trepova told the court this week, quoted by Reuters.”I feel especial pain and shame that a terrorist act was carried out by my own hands.”Image source, Vladlen Tatarsky/TelegramImage caption, Vladlen Tatarsky criticised the military over its conduct of the war in UkraineTatarsky was a well-known blogger with more than half a million followers, and had a criminal past.Born in the Donetsk region of eastern Ukraine, he said he joined Russian-backed separatists when they released him from jail, where he was serving time for armed robbery.He was part of a pro-Kremlin military blogger community that has taken on a relatively high-profile role since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine began in February 2022.Tatarsky was among those who have gone so far as to criticise the Russian authorities, slamming the military and even President Vladimir Putin for setbacks on the battlefield.But he was posthumously awarded the Order of Courage by Mr Putin.Trepova’s sentencing comes just after another controversial pro-war figure, the former commander of Russian-backed rebels in eastern Ukraine Igor Girkin, was sentenced to four years in jail for “calls to carry out extremist activities”. This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Watch: The moments leading up to St Petersburg cafe explosionRelated TopicsWar in UkraineRussiaUkraineMore on this storyRussia cafe bomb suspect charged with terrorismPublished4 April 2023Who are Russia’s war bloggers and why are they popular?Published4 April 2023Russia releases video of detained cafe bomb suspectPublished3 April 2023Top StoriesLive. ‘Justice not served’: Victims’ families hit out as Nottingham killer sentencedWatch: Killer’s rampage and arrest caught on camera. VideoWatch: Killer’s rampage and arrest caught on cameraPublished50 minutes agoLive. Scotland’s FM Humza Yousaf gives evidence to UK Covid InquiryFeaturesDowned Russian plane leaves unanswered questionsWhy a key crime stat doesn’t tell the full story about sexual offencesThe secrets of Claudia Winkleman’s Traitors styleUK to loan back Ghana’s looted ‘crown jewels’Chris Mason: Has Sunak seen off latest Tory wobbles?Why do people in Wales celebrate Saint Dwynwen’s day?South Africa fire survivors living in unsafe shacksRecords broken but Barbie snubbed – 6 Oscars talking pointsMediators push for Gaza ceasefire but gaps remainElsewhere on the BBCFrom ancient China to Hollywood movies…Greg is joined by comedian Phil Wang to learn all about the surprising history of kung fuAttributionSoundsOne of Scotland’s most notorious unsolved murders…With unprecedented courtroom access, see the case finally brought to trialAttributioniPlayer’Comedy saved my life’First broadcast in 2010, hear Frank Skinner’s desert island picks and personal revelationsAttributionSoundsThe mysterious deaths of Nazi fugitivesThree brothers investigate whether a family connection may explain the truthAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Tom Holland bonus sent to Tom Hollander in error2Reckless parents led to baby’s death, court told3Judge proposes Rubiales trial for World Cup kiss4Russian woman jailed for 27 years for cafe killing5Elba warns over mandatory jail for carrying knife6DJ who urinated on cancer patient at club jailed7Virgin most-complained about broadband provider8Stricken Japanese Moon mission landed on its nose9Ex-sub-postmistress wants money back, not apology10Alabama inmate faces first nitrogen execution in US

[ad_1] Darya Trepova is found guilty of carrying out a bombing that killed a pro-war blogger in St Petersburg.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaJudge proposes Spain’s Luis Rubiales face trial over Hermoso World Cup kissPublished22 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Luis Rubiales resigned as Spain’s football federation president following the incidentBy Jake LaphamBBC NewsA Spanish judge has proposed that former football federation president Luis Rubiales should stand trial over the women’s World Cup kiss involving captain Jenni Hermoso.Mr Rubiales grabbed Ms Hermoso’s head and kissed her during the presentation after Spain’s victory in Australia. She said the kiss was “not consensual”, a statement denied by Mr Rubiales.A judge has found there is enough evidence for the matter to proceed to trial.During a hearing in Madrid, the judge described the kiss as “not consensual and… a unilateral and surprising initiative”, according to a statement from the court cited by the Reuters news agency.Prosecutors previously charged Mr Rubiales with sexual assault and coercion.Penalties for such a kiss range from a fine to four years in prison.The incident has involved several Spanish football executives including Ms Hemoso’s former coach, a former marketing manager and the sports director of the men’s team.Jorge Vilda, Rubén Rivera and Albert Luque are accused of pressuring Ms Hermoso to say publicly the kiss had been consensual.The judge in Madrid has said the trio should also stand trial.Lawyers involved in the proceedings now have 10 days to make a formal trial request before a court.Ms Hermoso, Spain’s top scorer, testified before the court investigating her allegation for more than two-and-a-half hours earlier in January.According to Spanish media, she said the kiss was “unexpected and at no time consensual”.Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Jenni Hermoso said she “received threats” amid the controversyA statement issued shortly after the final that was attributed to Ms Hermoso had indicated the kiss had been consensual. But she later complained of being pressured by officials of the Spanish football federation to put her name to the statement.The kiss took place during the medal ceremony in Sydney on 20 August last year, following Spain’s win over England.Mr Rubiales has always maintained the kiss was a “consensual peck”, but in the wake of the incident, he was forced to resign as president of the Spanish football federation.It set off a wave of global anger at sexism at the highest levels of women’s sport.Related TopicsSpainMore on this storyHermoso testifies World Cup kiss was not consensualPublished2 JanuaryThe kiss that shook Spanish & global footballAttributionSportPublished10 September 2023Hermoso received threats amid Rubiales kiss scandalAttributionSportPublished6 November 2023Top StoriesLive. ‘Justice not served’: Victims’ families hit out as Nottingham killer sentencedElba warns over mandatory jail for carrying knifePublished2 hours agoLive. Sturgeon’s expletive-laden messages about Johnson shown to Covid inquiryFeaturesDowned Russian plane leaves unanswered questionsWhy a key crime stat doesn’t tell the full story about sexual offencesThe secrets of Claudia Winkleman’s Traitors styleChris Mason: Has Sunak seen off latest Tory wobbles?Why do people in Wales celebrate Saint Dwynwen’s day?South Africa fire survivors living in unsafe shacksRecords broken but Barbie snubbed – 6 Oscars talking pointsMediators push for Gaza ceasefire but gaps remainUS Election Unspun: Sign up for our newsletterElsewhere on the BBCTracing the historical origins of British comedy tropesIan Hislop’s on the hunt for the earliest examples of enduring British jokesAttributionSoundsBailiffs behaving badly…With councils increasingly using bailiffs, File on 4 examines the industry’s tacticsAttributionSoundsThe sound effect that became the ultimate movie in-jokeIt’s used in everything from Toy Story to Reservoir Dogs, but what is the Wilhelm Scream?AttributioniPlayerSamantha Harvey’s critically acclaimed new novelA thoughtful tale of space and the human experience, through the eyes of six astronautsAttributionSoundsMost Read1Tom Holland bonus sent to Tom Hollander in error2Elba warns over mandatory jail for carrying knife3Stricken Japanese Moon mission landed on its nose4Woman arrested after pet lion taken on car ride5Ex-sub-postmistress wants money back, not apology6Alabama inmate faces first nitrogen execution in US7Madonna ‘vigorously’ defends late concert lawsuit8DJ who urinated on cancer patient at club jailed9The secrets of Claudia Winkleman’s Traitors style10Captain Cook statue sawn off ahead of Australia Day

[ad_1] An investigating court finds enough evidence to try Rubiales and three Spanish football executives.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityAsiaChinaIndiaThai police to charge two over pet lion spotted cruising in BentleyPublished2 hours agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Ann IsaanrussiaImage caption, A video showing a chained lion cub seated in the back of a white, open-top Bentley has gone viralBy Yvette TanBBC News Police in Thailand have arrested a woman whose pet lion was pictured going on a joyride in the streets of Pattaya. A video that has now gone viral shows the chained lion cub seated in the back of a white, open-top Bentley. The lion was being driven about by a Sri Lankan man who has since left the country, and is believed to be a friend of the woman, Sawangjit Kosoongnern.While it is not illegal to own a lion in Thailand, it needs to be officially registered. Authorities in Thailand said Sawangjit claimed to have bought the animal from a Thai man in Nakhon Pathom province, who successfully facilitated its delivery to Pattaya.However he failed to have his facility checked by officials before doing so, which made both the transfer and ownership of the animal illegal. She is therefore facing charges of possessing a controlled wild animal without permission, which carries a penalty of a year’s imprisonment and a fine of up to 100,000 baht ($2,800; £2,200). Police were also reportedly looking to charge the Sri Lankan man, who had kept the lion in his rented pool villa, but were unable to as he is no longer in Thailand. He was due to be charged with bringing a controlled wild animal into public places, which carries jail time of up to six months and a fine of 50,000 baht. The man who sold the lion to Sawangjit will also face charges of moving an animal without permission. Officials say there are currently 224 lions in Thailand that are legally owned. Related TopicsAsiaThailandMore on this storyPet lion seized in Cambodia after TikTok videosPublished27 June 2021Lion cub found in French apartmentPublished24 October 2018Top StoriesLive. Nottingham killer to be sentenced as victim’s family call him ‘evil’Elba warns over mandatory jail for carrying knifePublished22 minutes agoUK to loan back Ghana’s looted ‘crown jewels’Published13 hours agoFeaturesNottingham killer should be in jail for life, says victim’s sonThe secrets of Claudia Winkleman’s Traitors styleChris Mason: Has Sunak seen off latest Tory wobbles?The Papers: UK ‘should have citizen army’ and Royal Mail cutbacksWhy do people in Wales celebrate Saint Dwynwen’s day?South Africa fire survivors living in unsafe shacksRecords broken but Barbie snubbed – 6 Oscars talking pointsMediators push for Gaza ceasefire but gaps remainUS Election Unspun: Sign up for our newsletterElsewhere on the BBCTracing the historical origins of British comedy tropesIan Hislop’s on the hunt tracks for the earliest examples of enduring British jokesAttributionSoundsBailiffs behaving badly…With councils increasingly using bailiffs, File on 4 examines the industry’s tacticsAttributionSoundsThe sound effect that became the ultimate movie in-jokeIt’s used in everything from Toy Story to Reservoir Dogs, but what is the Wilhelm Scream?AttributioniPlayerSamantha Harvey’s critically acclaimed new novelA thoughtful tale of space and the human experience, through the eyes of six astronautsAttributionSoundsMost Read1Elba warns over mandatory jail for carrying knife2Ex-sub-postmistress wants money back, not apology3Alabama inmate faces first nitrogen execution in US4Captain Cook statue sawn off ahead of Australia Day5Stricken Japanese Moon mission landed on its nose6Madonna ‘vigorously’ defends late concert lawsuit7Downed Russian plane leaves unanswered questions8UK to loan back Ghana’s looted ‘crown jewels’9UK ‘should have citizen army’ and Royal Mail cutbacks10The secrets of Claudia Winkleman’s Traitors style

[ad_1] Police were also reportedly looking to charge the Sri Lankan man, who had kept the lion in his rented pool villa, but were unable to as he is no…

Other Story

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaCould you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New YorkersThis video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Could you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New YorkersCloseJury selection is under way in Donald Trump’s New York City hush-money trial, with hundreds of people selected as potential jurors.They must answer a questionnaire to determine, among other things, if they can be impartial about the former president.The BBC asked some of those questions to Manhattan residents.SubsectionUS & CanadaPublished50 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRead descriptionExplore moreCould you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New Yorkers. Video, 00:02:16Could you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New YorkersSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished50 minutes ago2:16Up Next. A view from inside court for Trump’s blockbuster trial. Video, 00:01:15A view from inside court for Trump’s blockbuster trialSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished19 hours agoUp Next1:15Press, police and protesters: Outside Trump courthouse. Video, 00:01:12Press, police and protesters: Outside Trump courthouseSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished1 day ago1:12Trump’s ‘perp walk’ moment explained in 60 seconds. Video, 00:01:00Trump’s ‘perp walk’ moment explained in 60 secondsSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished31 March 20231:00Editor’s recommendationsCopenhagen stock exchange engulfed by huge fire. Video, 00:01:03Copenhagen stock exchange engulfed by huge fireSubsectionEuropePublished12 hours ago1:03Moment spire collapses at Copenhagen stock exchange. Video, 00:00:43Moment spire collapses at Copenhagen stock exchangeSubsectionEuropePublished11 hours ago0:43Dormice ladders built in the Forest of Dean. Video, 00:00:51Dormice ladders built in the Forest of DeanSubsectionGloucestershirePublished1 day ago0:51Liz Truss: The world was safer under Trump. Video, 00:00:35Liz Truss: The world was safer under TrumpSubsectionUK PoliticsPublished22 hours ago0:35Huge fires blaze along Miami highway. Video, 00:00:33Huge fires blaze along Miami highwaySubsectionUS & CanadaPublished12 hours ago0:33Watch: Georgia opposition leader punches MP during debate. Video, 00:00:34Watch: Georgia opposition leader punches MP during debateSubsectionEuropePublished21 hours ago0:34Wheelie bins fly and a caravan overturns in strong wind. Video, 00:00:24Wheelie bins fly and a caravan overturns in strong windSubsectionStoke & StaffordshirePublished1 day ago0:24Hannah Waddingham calls out demanding paparazzi. Video, 00:00:28Hannah Waddingham calls out demanding paparazziSubsectionEntertainment & ArtsPublished1 day ago0:28Endangered California condor chicks hatched in LA. Video, 00:01:28Endangered California condor chicks hatched in LASubsectionUS & CanadaPublished1 day ago1:28

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityUKEnglandN. IrelandScotlandAlbaWalesCymruIsle of ManGuernseyJerseyLocal NewsFirst product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealedPublished11 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, ReutersImage caption, Meghan pictured at a polo match in Florida last weekBy Sean CoughlanRoyal correspondentA first glimpse of the new business venture from the Duchess of Sussex has been teased on social media, with pictures of a jar of strawberry jam.In a bid to preserve a sense of mystery, the jam from the new American Riviera Orchard brand seemed to be spread among friends and influencers.Fashion designer Tracy Robbins posted a picture of the jam on Instagram.It was numbered “17 of 50”, suggesting the number of recipients of this first fruit of the new business.The arrival of Meghan’s new California-based lifestyle brand had been signalled on social media last month and this suggests that it will be selling food products.What do we know about Meghan’s new brand?Five things about Harry and Meghan’s brand revampWhy did Harry and Meghan leave the Royal Family?There seemed to be have been something of a re-launch for Meghan and husband Prince Harry’s brands and businesses this year, beginning with the overhaul of their regal-looking website under the sussex.com label.Their latest projects seem to be moving away from a previous focus on their time as working royals, such as their Netflix film Harry and Meghan and Prince Harry’s memoir Spare.The hint about the strawberry jam from Meghan’s American Riviera Orchard brand seems to fit with the couple’s latest Netflix plans.Meghan is going to launch a Netflix show which will “celebrate the joys of cooking and gardening, entertaining, and friendship”.Prince Harry will be involved in another Netflix venture showing the inside track on the world of polo. That’s the equestrian sport, not the mints.Delfina Blaquier, married to Prince Harry’s polo-playing friend Nacho Figueras, also posted a picture of the new jam, with hers labelled “10 of 50”.The social media trail for American Riviera Orchard evokes a sense of the couple’s home in California – and this soft launch for the jam show pictures of the jars in a sunny basket of lemons.It’s not known how much items from the new lifestyle brand will cost. Although there are already plenty of other royals getting into jams. Visitors to the gift shops in royal palaces can get a Buckingham Palace Strawberry Preserve for £3.95 or Windsor Castle Fine Cut Seville Orange Marmalade, also for £3.95.On both sides of the Atlantic they seem to be conserving their finances.Related TopicsUK Royal FamilyMeghan, Duchess of SussexMore on this storyWhat we know about Meghan’s regal lifestyle brandPublished16 MarchMeghan launches surprise new lifestyle brandPublished14 MarchTop StoriesMPs back smoking ban for those born after 2009Published8 minutes agoMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished2 hours agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished7 hours agoFeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlinePlaying Coachella after cancer emotional, says DJHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Nursery boss ‘killed baby she strapped to beanbag’2Birmingham Airport flights disrupted by incident3Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge4First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed5MPs back smoking ban for those born after 20096Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference7Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames8Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline9Marten a ‘lioness’ who ‘loved her cubs’, court told10Sons of McCartney and Lennon release joint single

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaSupreme Court hears 6 Jan case that may hit Trump trialPublished2 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsUS Capitol riotsImage source, Brent StirtonImage caption, Hundreds of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol after holding a “Stop the Steal” rally on 6 January, 2021By Nadine YousifBBC NewsThe US Supreme Court have begun hearing a case that could undo charges for those who stormed the Capitol in 2021. It focuses on whether a 2002 federal law created to prevent corporate misconduct could apply to individuals involved in the 6 January riots. More than 350 people have been charged in the incident under that law, which carries a 20-year prison penalty.Donald Trump faces the same charge in the pending federal case accusing him of election interference. The law makes it a crime to “corruptly” obstruct or impede an official proceeding. On Tuesday, Supreme Court Justices heard two hours of arguments over the law’s interpretation. However, it remained unclear how they would rule. A lawyer for a man who stormed the Capitol and was prosecuted under the law argued before the Justices that “a host of felony and misdemeanour” crimes already exist to prosecute his clients actions.The 2002 law passed in the wake of the Enron accounting scandal, Jeffrey Green said, was not one of them. US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar counterargued that rioters deliberately attempted “to prevent Congress from certifying the results of the election,” therefore obstructing an official proceeding. Both fielded sceptical questions from the Justices. At one point, Mr Green argued that there is no historical precedent in which the law was used to prosecute demonstrators.Justice Sonia Sotomayor replied: “We’ve never had a situation before where (there was an attempt) to stop a proceeding violently, so I am not sure what a lack of history proves.”On the other hand, Ms Prelogar fielded questions from Justice Neil Gorusch on whether the law could then be stretched to apply to a “sit-in that disrupts a trial” or “a heckler” at the State of the Union Address. “Would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify for 20 years in federal prison?” he asked, appearing to reference an incident in which Jamaal Bowman, Democrat House representative, pressed a fire alarm in the Capitol.How the top court rules could have wide-ranging effects on the hundreds of people charged, convicted or sentenced under the law, as well as the prosecution of Mr Trump. Here is a breakdown of the key players and the law being argued: What is the 2002 federal law at the centre of the trial?The law is called the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. It was passed in response to the Enron scandal in the early 2000s, after it was exposed that those involved had engaged in massive fraud and shredding documents. It criminalizes the destruction of evidence – like records or documents. But it also penalises anyone who “otherwise obstructs, influences or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so.” How has it been used in response to the 6 January riots?Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) has brought obstruction charges against those who participated in the storming of the Capitol. Federal prosecutors argue they did so to impede Congress’ certification of the presidential electoral vote count to cement Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election. Therefore, the latter portion of the law that deals with obstructing an “official proceeding” would apply, the DoJ says. Who is challenging the law’s use in this case, and why? The Supreme Court is hearing a challenge to the law’s application brought forward by a former Pennsylvania police officer.Joseph Fischer was charged under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act with obstruction of a congressional proceeding on 6 January, as well as assaulting a police officer and disorderly conduct. His lawyers argue that prosecutors overreached with applying the Act, which they say deals explicitly with destroying or tampering with evidence integral to an investigation. Those who challenge the law’s application in 6 January cases also argue that a broad interpretation of the law would allow the prosecution of lobbyists or protestors who disrupt matters in Congress.How could the Supreme Court ruling impact Trump?The former president is charged under the very same law in a federal case accusing him of working to overturn the results of the 2020 election, which he lost to Mr Biden.If Supreme Court justices rule that the law does not apply to the 6 January rioters, Mr Trump could seek dismissal of half the charges he faces in that case.It also could be seen as a political win for the former president, who is seeking re-election in November, as he repeatedly has accused prosecutors of overreach. A final ruling is not expected until June. Related TopicsUS Capitol riotsDonald TrumpMore on this storySupreme Court to hear appeal over Capitol riot chargePublished13 December 2023A very simple guide to Trump’s indictmentsPublished25 August 2023Supreme Court asked to rule on Trump’s immunityPublished12 December 2023Top StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished1 hour agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished5 hours agoNo liberty in addiction, says health secretary on smoking banPublished4 minutes agoFeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2Birmingham Airport suspends flights over incident3First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed4Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference5Marten a ‘lioness’ who ‘loved her cubs’, court told6Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline7Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames8No liberty in addiction, says minister on smoking ban9Sons of McCartney and Lennon release joint single10Boy, 4, dies after fire at family home in Wigan

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaNational Conservatism Conference: Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels eventPublished4 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, ReutersImage caption, Nigel Farage said the decision to shut the conference down was as an attempt to stifle free speechBy Nick Beake in Brussels and Laura GozziBBC NewsBrussels police have been ordered to shut down a conference attended by right-wing politicians across Europe, including Nigel Farage and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.Organisers say the National Conservatism Conference in the Belgian capital is continuing, but guests are no longer allowed to enter. Local authorities had raised concerns over public safety.A UK spokeswoman called reports of police action “extremely disturbing”. She said that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was a “strong supporter and advocator for free speech” and that he was “very clear that cancelling events or preventing attendance and no-platforming speakers is damaging to free speech and to democracy as a result”.Alexander De Croo, the Belgian prime minister, said that the shutting down of the conference was “unacceptable”.Referring to the fact that it was the local mayor, Emir Kir, who opposed the conference, Mr De Croo added that while municipal autonomy was a cornerstone of Belgium’s democracy it could “never overrule the Belgian constitution guaranteeing the freedom of speech”. “Banning political meetings is unconstitutional. Full stop,” Mr De Croo wrote on X.In a message to organisers, Mr Kir had said some of the attendees of Tuesday’s conference held anti-gay and anti-abortion views. “Among these personalities there are several particularly from the right-conservative, religious right and European extreme right,” his statement said.Mr Kir also wrote on X: “The far right is not welcome.”Nigel Farage, who took to the stage this morning, told the BBC the decision to close down the conference because there were homophobes in the audience was “cobblers”, and that he condemned the decision as an attempt to stifle free speech. “Thank God For Brexit”, he said.Organised by a think-tank called the Edmund Burke Foundation, the National Conservatism Conference is a global movement which espouses what it describes as traditional values, which it claims are being “undermined and overthrown”. It also opposes further European integration.The conference said it aimed to bring together “public figures, journalists, scholars and students” who understood the connection between conservatism and the idea of nationhood and national traditions. French far-right politician Eric Zemmour, arriving for the conference after police had blocked the entrance, told journalists that Mr Kir was “using the police as a private militia to prevent… Europeans from taking part freely”.Organisers said Mr Zemmour was not allowed into the venue and that his address would be postponed.Former UK Home Secretary Suella Braverman and far-right French politician Eric Zemmour were listed as keynote speakers. The National Conservatism Conference reportedly started around 08:00 (06:00 GMT) on Tuesday and carried on for three hours until police showed up and asked the organisers to make attendees leave.Later, organisers wrote on X: “The police are not letting anyone in. People can leave, but they cannot return. Delegates have limited access to food and water, which are being prevented from delivery. Is this what city mayor Emir Kir is aiming for?”Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban and the former Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki were due to speak tomorrow. Earlier, the organisers said on X that they would challenge the order to shut the conference down. “The police entered the venue on our invitation, saw the proceedings and the press corps, and quickly withdrew. Is it possible they witnessed how peaceful the event is?,” they wrote on X.The Claridge event space – located near Brussels’s European Quarter – can host up to 850 people. Around 250 people were in attendance on Tuesday afternoon.Mohamed Nemri, the owner of Claridge, told the BBC he had decided to host the event because “we don’t reject any party…. even if we don’t have the same opinion. That’s normal”.”I am Muslim and people have different opinion and that’s it. We are living in a freedom country. I’d like to people to talk freely,” he added.It is the third venue that was supposed to hold the event, after the previous two fell through. Belgian media reported that one venue pulled out after pressure by a group called the “Antifascist coordination of Belgium”.Related TopicsBelgiumTop StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished43 minutes agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished5 hours agoLive. US expects to impose further sanctions on Iran ‘in the coming days’FeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed3Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference4Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline5Superdry boss hits back at ‘not cool’ criticism6Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames7MPs to vote on smoking ban for those born after 20098Stabbed TV presenter ‘feeling much better’9Sons of McCartney and Lennon release joint single10Baby hurt in Sydney stabbing out of intensive care

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaNasa says part of International Space Station crashed into Florida homePublished40 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, NASAImage caption, The recovered object was part of a stanchion used to mount batteries to a cargo palletBy Max MatzaBBC NewsUS space agency Nasa confirmed that an object that crashed into a home in Florida earlier this month was part of the International Space Station (ISS). The metal object was jettisoned from the orbiting outpost in March 2021, Nasa said on Monday after analysing the sample at the Kennedy Space Center.The 1.6lb (0.7kg) metal object tore through two layers of ceiling after re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. Homeowner Alejandro Otero said his son was nearly injured by the impact. Nasa said the object was part of some 5,800lbs of hardware that was dumped by the station after it had new lithium-ion batteries installed. “The hardware was expected to fully burn up during entry through Earth’s atmosphere on March 8, 2024. However, a piece of hardware survived and impacted a home in Naples, Florida,” the agency said.The debris was determined to be part of a stanchion used to mount batteries on a cargo pallet. The object, made from metal alloy Inconel, has dimensions of 4in by 1.6in (10.1cm by 4cm).Mr Otero told CBS affiliate Wink-TV that the device created a “tremendous sound” as it blasted into his home.”It almost hit my son. He was two rooms over and heard it all,” he said.”I was shaking. I was completely in disbelief. What are the chances of something landing on my house with such force to cause so much damage,” Mr Otero continued.”I’m super grateful that nobody got hurt.”According to Nasa, the ISS will “perform a detailed investigation” on how the debris survived burn-up.What’s the risk of being hit by falling space debris?Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No it’s more space junkSpace junk has been a growing a problem. Earlier this month, sky watchers in California watched mysterious golden streaks moving through the night sky.US officials later determined that the light show was caused by burning debris from a Chinese rocket re-entering earth’s orbit.In February, a Chinese satellite known as “Object K” burned up as it re-entered the atmosphere over Hawaii.Last year, a barnacle-covered giant metal dome found on a Western Australian beach was identified as a component of an Indian rocket. There are plans to display it alongside chunks of Nasa’s Skylab, which crashed in Australia in 1979. This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Object thought to be a satellite burns up on re-entering Earth’s atmosphereRelated TopicsSpace debrisNasaFloridaUnited StatesMore on this storyIs it a bird? Is it a plane? No it’s more space junkPublished3 AprilRobot dog trains to walk on Moon in Oregon trialsPublished3 days agoTop StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished50 minutes agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished4 hours agoLive. US expects to impose further sanctions on Iran ‘in the coming days’FeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed3Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference4Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline5Superdry boss hits back at ‘not cool’ criticism6Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames7MPs to vote on smoking ban for those born after 20098Stabbed TV presenter ‘feeling much better’9Baby hurt in Sydney stabbing out of intensive care10Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice forever

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaFormer Marine jailed for nine years for bombing abortion clinicPublished7 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsUS abortion debateImage source, CBSBy Max MatzaBBC NewsA former US Marine has been jailed for nine years for firebombing a California Planned Parenthood clinic and plotting other attacks to spark a “race war”.Chance Brannon, 24, pleaded guilty to the March 2022 attack on the healthcare clinic, which provides abortions in some of its locations.He also plotted to attack Jewish people and an LGBT pride event taking place at Dodger Stadium in Los Angeles. At the time of his arrest, he was an active duty member of the US Marines. Prosecutors said Brannon was a neo-Nazi who frequently spoke of “cleansing” the US of “particular ethnic groups”. In November, Brannon pleaded guilty to conspiracy, destruction of property, possession of an explosive and intentionally damaging a reproductive health services facility.Kristen Clarke, the assistant attorney general for the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, said the attack “was designed to terrorise patients seeking reproductive healthcare and the people who provide it”.The explosion damaged the front entrance to the clinic in Costa Mesa, Orange County. No one was injured.However, Mehtab Syed, of the FBI’s Los Angeles field office, said Brannon’s “deep-rooted hatred and extremist views… could have killed innocent people”. Mr Syed added that Brannon plotted to rob Jewish residents in the Hollywood Hills, and had also discussed plans to attack the power grid. Further to this, in 2022, Mr Syed said Brannon, of San Juan Capistrano, placed calls to two US “adversaries” hoping to offer himself as a “mole” providing US intelligence.Two co-defendants, Tibet Ergul and Xavier Batten, have pleaded guilty to similar charges and will be sentenced next month.According to the National Abortion Federation, a group representing US abortion providers, there was a “sharp increase” in violence against clinics in 2022. Related TopicsAbortionUS abortion debateUnited StatesCaliforniaMore on this storyWhat is Planned Parenthood?Published25 September 2015Top StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished53 minutes agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished3 hours agoLive. Israel demands sanctions on Iranian missile projectFeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference3Superdry boss hits back at ‘not cool’ criticism4First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed5Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline6Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames7MPs to vote on smoking ban for those born after 20098Stabbed TV presenter ‘feeling much better’9William to return to duties after Kate diagnosis10Baby hurt in Sydney stabbing out of intensive care