BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityScience & EnvironmentEuropean court rules human rights violated by climate inactionPublished9 minutes agocommentsCommentsShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsClimateImage source, ReutersBy Georgina RannardBBC climate reporterA group of older Swiss women have won the first ever climate case victory in the European Court of Human Rights.The women, mostly in their 70s, said that their age and gender made them particularly vulnerable to the effects of heatwaves linked to climate change.The court said Switzerland’s efforts to meet its emission reduction targets had been woefully inadequate.It is the first time the powerful court has ruled on global warming.Swedish campaigner Greta Thunberg joined activists celebrating at the court in Strasbourg on Tuesday. “We still can’t really believe it. We keep asking our lawyers, ‘is that right?’ Rosemarie Wydler-Walti, one of the leaders of the Swiss women, told Reuters news agency. “And they tell us it’s the most you could have had. The biggest victory possible.” “This is only the beginning of climate litigation,” said Ms Thunberg. “This means that we have to fight even more, since this is only the beginning. Because in a climate emergency, everything is at stake.”The ruling is binding and can trickle down to influence the law in 46 countries in Europe including the UK.Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Rosmarie Wyder-Walti and Anne Mahrer from Senior Women for Climate ProtectionThe Court ruled that Switzerland had “failed to comply with its duties under the Convention concerning climate change” and that it had violated the right to respect for private and family life. It also found that “there had been critical gaps” in the country’s policies to tackle climate change including failing to quantify reductions in greenhouse gases – those gases that warm Earth’s atmosphere when we burn fossil fuels like oil, coal and gas.The Swiss women, called KlimaSeniorinnen or Senior Women for Climate Protection, argued that they cannot leave their homes and suffer health attacks during heatwaves in Switzerland.On Tuesday data showed that last month was the world’s warmest March on record, meaning the temperature records have broken ten months in a row.More than 2,000 women are in the KlimaSeniorinnen group. They launched the case nine years ago, calling for better protection of women’s health in relation to climate change.Swiss President Viola Amherd told a news conference that she needed to read the judgement in detail before commenting, according to Reuters news agency. She said: “Sustainability is very important to Switzerland, biodiversity is very important to Switzerland, the net zero target is very important to Switzerland.”The court dismissed two other cases brought by six Portuguese young people and a former French mayor. Both argued that European governments had failed to tackle climate change quickly enough, violating their rights.Swiss glaciers get 10% smaller in two yearsWhy is the world getting warmer?Record hot March sparks ‘uncharted territory’ fearMember of the KlimaSeniorinnen Elisabeth Stern, 76, told BBC News that she has seen how the climate in Switzerland has changed since she was a child growing up on a farm.’Not made to sit in a rocking chair and knit’Asked about her commitment to the case, she said: “Some of us are just made that way. We are not made to sit in a rocking chair and knit.””We know statistically that in 10 years we will be gone. So whatever we do now, we are not doing for ourselves, but for the sake of our children and our children’s children,” she added.Youth activists around the world had hoped that the six Portuguese young people would also win their case against 32 European governments.The youth, aged from 12-24, had argued that increasingly extreme heatwaves and wildfires left them unable to go outside to play, to go to school, and that they suffered from climate anxiety.But the court said the case needed to be decided in Portugal first.Sofia Oliveira, 19, told BBC News that she was disappointed but that the Swiss women’s win ‘is a win for us too and a win for everyone’.”A third case by a former French mayor claimed that inaction by the French government risked his town being submerged in the North Sea. It was dismissed because he no longer lived in France and claimants must prove that they are direct victims of human rights violations.Decisions made in the European Court of Human Rights influence law across its 46 member states.Estelle Dehon KC, a barrister at Cornerstone Barristers in the UK, said “the judgement deals with difficult issues that also vex the UK courts in a way that may be persuasive.””It comprehensively dismisses the argument that courts cannot rule on climate legal obligations because climate change is a global phenomenon or because action by one state is just a ‘drop in the ocean’,” she told BBC News.Governments globally have signed up to drastically reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.But scientists and activists say that progress is too slow and the world is not on track to meet the crucial target of limiting global temperature rise to 1.5C. Switzerland’s largest party, the right-wing Swiss People’s Party, condemned the ruling, calling it a scandal and threatening to leave the Council of Europe.That is unlikely to happen because they hold just two seats of seven in government.The Socialist Party welcomed the court’s decision and said the government should implement it as soon as possible, according to Swiss broadcaster RTS.Politicians in Switzerland responded to the rulinghttps://x.com/UDCch/status/1777707449501310985Related TopicsEuropeHuman rightsEuropean Court of Human RightsClimateSwitzerlandComments can not be loadedTo load Comments you need to enable JavaScript in your browserView commentsTop StoriesLive. Post Office would do ‘anything to hide Horizon failures’ – Alan BatesSecurity raised for Champions League ties after attack threatPublished47 minutes agoIsrael’s Gaza withdrawal hints at what comes nextPublished1 hour agoFeaturesFirst ever climate change victory in Europe courtSpectacular images of eclipse that transfixed North AmericaThe eclipse at Niagara Falls: ‘Wow! Spectacular’ VideoThe eclipse at Niagara Falls: ‘Wow! Spectacular’The Syria I came back to is not the one I leftHow are the non-dom rules changing?Israel’s Gaza withdrawal hints at what comes next’Why I rewrote Huckleberry Finn to give slave Jim a voice’Record hot March sparks ‘uncharted territory’ fear’Carrot harvest helped me detect ancient coin hoard’Elsewhere on the BBCWhat was so special about yesterday’s solar eclipse?Science correspondent Pallab Ghosh’s brief guide to the cosmic phenomenonAttributionSoundsHow did Sweden become a hotbed for hot tracks? James Ballardie charts Sweden’s remarkable rise as a music superpowerAttributioniPlayerWill China’s electric car industry shock Europe?Steve Fowler explores the potential risks Chinese electric car manufacturing poses to Western brandsAttributionSoundsOne of the world’s biggest stars through a unique lensThe stories behind ten defining images of Amy Winehouse, from iconic shots to private snapsAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Security raised for Champions League ties after threat2Sports Direct dubs Newcastle kit deal unlawful3Mum of woman stabbed in street ‘can’t stop crying’4Spain to axe ‘golden visas’ scheme5King Charles comes face to face with new banknotes6Court rules women’s-only exhibit must allow male visitors7Israel’s Gaza withdrawal hints at what comes next8Louise Thompson reveals she had stoma bag fitted9Boy, nine, killed in family farm accident10Man held after woman stabbed to death pushing pram

[ad_1] “We are not made to sit in a rocking chair and knit,” said one of the older Swiss women who won.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityScience & EnvironmentMore climate records fall in world’s warmest FebruaryPublished3 hours agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsClimateImage source, Getty ImagesBy Mark PoyntingClimate and environment researcher, BBC NewsLast month was the world’s warmest February in modern times, the EU’s climate service says, extending the run of monthly records to nine in a row.Each month since June 2023 has seen new temperature highs for the time of year.The world’s sea surface is at its hottest on record, while Antarctic sea-ice has again reached extreme lows.Temperatures are still being boosted by the Pacific’s El Niño weather event, but human-caused climate change is by far the main driver of the warmth.”Heat-trapping greenhouse gases are unequivocally the main culprit,” stresses Prof Celeste Saulo, Secretary General of the World Meteorological Organization.Carbon dioxide concentrations are at their highest level for at least two million years, according to the UN’s climate body, and increased by near-record levels again over the past year.Those warming gases helped make February 2024 about 1.77C warmer than “pre-industrial” times – before humans started burning large amounts of fossil fuels – according to the EU’s Copernicus Climate Change Service. This breaks the previous record, from 2016, by around 0.12C.These temperatures saw particularly severe heat afflict western Australia, southeast Asia, southern Africa and South America. The 12-month average now sits at 1.56C above pre-industrial levels – after the first year-long breach of 1.5C warming was confirmed last month.Back in 2015 in Paris, nearly 200 countries agreed to try to keep the rise in warming under 1.5C, to help avoid some of the worst climate impacts. That threshold in the Paris agreement is generally accepted to mean a 20-year average – so it hasn’t yet been broken – but the relentless string of records illustrates how close the world is getting to doing so.A really simple guide to climate changeWhat is the Paris agreement and why does 1.5C matter?Oceans and sea-ice under strainRecent records haven’t just been limited to air temperatures. Countless climate metrics are far beyond levels seen in modern times.One of the most notable is sea surface temperatures. As the graph below shows, the margin of records in recent months has been particularly striking.Researchers are keen to stress that the scale and extent of the oceanic heat is not simply a consequence of the natural weather event known as El Niño, which was declared in June 2023. “Ocean surface temperatures in the equatorial Pacific clearly reflect El Niño. But sea surface temperatures in other parts of the globe have been persistently and unusually high for the past 10 months,” explains Prof Saulo.”This is worrying and cannot be explained by El Niño alone.”What are El Niño and La Niña, and how do they change the weather?Ocean warming has prompted concerns about the mass bleaching of coral reefs. It also raises global sea-levels and can help to fuel higher intensity hurricanes. Unusually warm waters may also have been a factor in another exceptional month for Antarctic sea-ice. The three lowest minimum extents in the satellite era have now occurred in the last three years.Scientists are struggling to explain exactly what’s going on. Until 2017, Antarctic sea-ice had defied predictions that it would shrink, unlike in the Arctic, where the downward trend has been much clearer. The apparent recent shift – occurring at the same time as other records are being broken around the planet – adds to concerns that Antarctic sea-ice may finally be waking up to climate change. “I don’t think you can say it’s coincidental,” Prof Martin Siegert, a glaciologist at the University of Exeter, told BBC News. “It’s absolutely frightening. The records are just off [the] scale.” Is the world warming faster than expected?Antarctic sea-ice at ‘mind-blowing’ lowAn end to El Niño in sightThere are signs that the run of global temperature records may finally come to an end in the months ahead.The 2023-24 El Niño has been one of the five strongest such events on record, the World Meteorological Organization announced on Tuesday, but it is gradually weakening. El Niño will continue to have an effect on temperatures and weather patterns for the next few months. “We would expect [El Niño] to continue to keep 2024 temperatures elevated at least through the first half of the year,” Dr Colin Morice, a senior scientist at the UK’s Met Office Hadley Centre, told BBC News.However, a switch to neutral conditions in the Pacific is likely between April and June, according to US science body NOAA, and a further switch to the cool phase known as La Niña could then happen between June and August.This would likely put a temporary lid on global air temperatures, with a cooler sea surface in the East Pacific allowing less heat to escape and warm the air. But as long as human activities keep releasing huge amounts of greenhouse gases, temperatures will continue rising in the long-term, ultimately leading to more records and extreme weather.”We know what to do – stop burning fossil fuels and replace them with more sustainable, renewable sources of energy,” says Dr Friederike Otto, senior lecturer in climate science at Imperial College London.”Until we do that, extreme weather events intensified by climate change will continue to destroy lives and livelihoods.”Related TopicsAntarcticEl NiñoParis climate agreementClimateSevere weatherMore on this storyWhy is the world getting warmer?Published8 FebruaryEngland and Wales had warmest February on recordPublished5 days agoWorld breaches 1.5C warming threshold for full yearPublished8 February2023 confirmed as world’s hottest year on recordPublished9 JanuaryTop StoriesHunt cuts National Insurance and extends child benefit as election loomsPublished7 hours agoChris Mason: No fireworks but tax cuts headache for LabourPublished4 hours ago’We know what’s coming’: East Ukraine braces for Russian advancePublished5 hours agoFeaturesChris Mason: No fireworks but tax cuts headache for LabourThe Papers: Hunt cuts NI but is told ‘Britain deserves better’The world’s largest robots are setting sail’We know what’s coming’: East Ukraine braces for Russian advanceDeath, disaster and redemption – England’s tumultuous tour of IndiaAttributionSportThe state of the union is… Americans fill in the blank. VideoThe state of the union is… Americans fill in the blank’My AI twin may get me more modelling work’Is Hugh right about Oscar films being ‘frankly too long’?How Nikki Haley battled to stay in fight against Trump. VideoHow Nikki Haley battled to stay in fight against TrumpElsewhere on the BBCFrom the bagpipes to New Labour…Alastair Campbell is passionate about his interests and deeply tribal in his allegiancesAttributionSoundsCan you sort the facts from the fibs?Two of the statements are true, one is an out and out lie…AttributionBitesizeA satirical look at the scheming world of PRCharles Prentiss and Martin McCabe embark on a new career as spin doctorsAttributionSoundsA floppy disc that transformed the music sceneHow a chance encounter changed the fortunes of New Order and Factory RecordsAttributionSoundsMost Read1Rust armourer guilty of cinematographer’s death2Hunt cuts NI but is told ‘Britain deserves better’3Australian charged over high-profile disappearance4’We know what’s coming’: East Ukraine braces for Russian advance5The world’s largest robots are setting sail6Budget: Key points at a glance7Hunt cuts National Insurance again as election looms8Chris Mason: No fireworks but tax cuts headache for Labour9Afghan judge hunted by Taliban wins High Court case10Three killed in Houthi attack on ship – US military

[ad_1] It’s the ninth month of global temperature records in a row, driven by climate change and El Niño.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaPutin challenger Boris Nadezhdin barred from Russia’s electionPublished36 minutes agocommentsCommentsShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, MAXIM SHIPENKOV/EPA-EFE/REX/ShutterstockImage caption, Boris Nadezhdin has vowed to challenge the election commission’s rejection in Russia’s Supreme CourtBy Paul KirbyBBC NewsRussia’s election commission has rejected anti-war challenger Boris Nadezhdin as a candidate in next month’s presidential vote.Mr Nadezhdin has been relatively critical of Vladimir Putin’s full-scale war in Ukraine when few dissenting voices have been tolerated in Russia.Election authorities claimed more than 15% of the signatures he submitted with his candidate application were flawed.He had tried to challenge this, but the commission rejected his bid.Refusing to give up, Mr Nadezhdin, 60, said on social media that he would challenge the decision in Russia’s Supreme Court.The Central Election Commission said that of the 105,000 signatures submitted by Mr Nadezhdin, more than 9,000 were invalid and they cited a variety of violations.That left 95,587 names, meaning he was just short of the 100,000 required signatures to register as a candidate, commission member Andrei Shutov said.”There are tens of millions of people here who were going to vote for me, ” Mr Nadezhdin complained to the commission. “According to all polls, I am in second place after Putin.””The decision has been made,” declared commission chairwoman Ella Pamfilova. “If Nadezhdin wants, he can go to court,” Tass news agency quoted her as saying.Russia’s presidential election is due to take place from 15-17 March, although the result is not in doubt as only candidates viewed as acceptable to the Kremlin are running. A final decision on who can take part in the election will come on Saturday, but the election commission chairwoman said it was already clear there would be four candidates on the ballot.Other than Vladimir Putin, they include nationalist leader Leonid Slutsky, parliament deputy speaker Vladislav Davankov and Communist Nikolai Kharitonov. All their parties have broadly backed Kremlin policies and none of the trio is seen as a genuine challenger.Image source, REUTERS/Maxim ShemetovImage caption, Ella Pamfilova, head of the Central Election Commission, said it was now clear Mr Putin would face three other candidates”Running for president in 2024 is the most important political decision of my life. I am not retreating from my intentions,” Mr Nadezhdin wrote on Telegram. “I collected more than 200,000 signatures across Russia. We conducted the collection openly and honestly.”Boris Nadezhdin is one of the few government critics whose voices have been heard on the ubiquitous talk shows on state-run TV since the invasion on 24 February 2022. He has appeared as a type of anti-war “whipping boy” that other guests would target for criticism.In the 1990s he worked as an adviser for Putin critic Boris Nemtsov who was assassinated a stone’s thrown from the Kremlin in 2015. But he also has ties to Sergei Kiriyenko, a key Putin political overseer.Read Steve Rosenberg: How Russians view looming electionsAlthough Mr Nadezhdin’s run for the presidency was viewed initially with suspicion by some opposition figures, Russia’s main opposition leader Alexei Navalny gave his backing to the Nadezhdin campaign from his jail cell inside the Arctic Circle, as did exiled former business magnate Mikhail Khodorkovsky.Mr Nadezhdin appeared on the BBC last month promising to end the war in Ukraine on his first day as president, although he was realistic about his chances of success.”My first task will be to stop the conflict with Ukraine, and then to restore normal relations between Russia and the Western community.”He is not the first presidential hopeful to have run on an anti-war platform. In December, former TV journalist and independent politician Yekaterina Duntsova was barred from running because the election commission said there were mistakes on her application form.Mr Nadezhdin said he had tapped into a wave of anti-war sentiment in Russia, meeting the wives of reservists who want their husbands to return from the war. His campaign started slowly and it was only in recent weeks that Russians began registering their support in large numbers.His increasing success also attracted condemnation from pro-Kremlin propagandists such as Vladimir Solovyov, who suggested he might be a stooge for “Ukrainian Nazis”.This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Watch: ‘Putin has made mistakes’, Kremlin challenger says in BBC exclusiveMore on this story’Send back our husbands’ – Russian women in rare protestPublished23 JanuaryView commentsTop StoriesLive. Labour criticised for ditching £28bn green pledgePM attacks Starmer for linking trans jibe to Ghey casePublished14 minutes agoVeteran to be charged with murdering man in 1972Published16 minutes agoFeatures’We are surrounded’ – Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous borderWhat happened to Labour’s £28bn for green projects?Kane on his chase for ‘team trophies’ as well as recordsAttributionSportNorth Koreans working in China ‘exploited like slaves’I rarely saw people like me in lead roles, says One Day starDisney boss betting big on Taylor Swift and Fortnite to boost streaming serviceIndian player sparks conversation on sexism in chessWe don’t watch from the sidelines like Taylor SwiftImmersive screenings can weaken films – ScorseseElsewhere on the BBC’No one was treating me seriously’The woman who went for viral for claiming to be Madeleine McCann explains her motivesAttributionSoundsA shining performance in Radio 2’s Piano Room!British soul legend Beverley Knight performs at Maida Vale with the BBC Concert OrchestraAttributionSoundsThe cities hidden beneath the waterDive deep and discover real underwater locations all across the worldAttributionBitesizeThe surprising health benefits of doing the plankMichael Mosley explores whether it outshines crunches or sit-ups…AttributionSoundsMost Read1Veteran to be charged with murdering man in 19722Scotland’s health secretary quits over iPad row3Nestlé axes classic Breakaway bar after 54 years4Putin challenger barred from Russia’s election5North Tyneside raids over Clapham suspect search6Climbing Everest? You need to bring your poo back7Kate Garraway ‘a little wobbly’ on return to TV8China fury as Messi skips HK match, plays in Japan9McCann suspect to stay silent in German rape trial10World breaches 1.5C warming threshold for full year

[ad_1] Russia’s election commission has rejected anti-war challenger Boris Nadezhdin as a presidential candidate.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityAsiaChinaIndiaLionel Messi: Chinese fury as superstar plays in Japan after missing Hong Kong matchPublished14 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Lionel Messi remained on the bench for the entire 90 minutes of the Hong Kong friendlyBy Nicholas YongBBC News, SingaporeLionel Messi played in a Japan friendly after missing a match in Hong Kong, leaving Chinese fans seething and sparking conspiracy theories.State media outlet Global Times accused the footballer and his club Inter Miami of “political motives” with the aim of “embarrassing” Hong Kong.Messi remained on the bench throughout Sunday’s match in the Chinese special administrative region, citing injury.Wednesday’s game in Tokyo led some fans to question whether he’d been injured.Some 38,000 fans at the Hong Kong Stadium booed and demanded refunds when Inter Miami co-owner David Beckham addressed the crowd at the end of Sunday’s match. They had paid up to HK$4,880 (£494; $624) to watch the 36-year-old Argentine superstar.This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, A shame I couldn’t play in Hong Kong friendly – MessiJust last year, Messi received a rock star welcome in Beijing when he played for his country in a friendly against Australia. Some 68,000 fans paid up to $680 for the chance to see him in action. He is also a spokesperson for big Chinese brands such as Huawei, Chery, Tencent, Mengniu, Chishui River Wine and J&T Express.Kevin Yeung, Hong Kong’s secretary for culture, sports and tourism, said government officials were repeatedly told that Messi would play. But with 10 minutes left in the match, they were informed that a hamstring adductor injury would prevent him from playing.”We immediately requested them to explore other remedies, such as Messi appearing on the field to interact with his fans and receiving the trophy,” Yeung said.”Unfortunately, as you all see, this did not work out.”The territory’s chief executive John Lee said he was extremely disappointed by Messi’s absence and called for an explanation from match organisers.Other officials like Hong Kong lawmaker Regina Ip also reacted with fury, claiming that “Hong Kong people hate Messi, Inter-Miami, and the black hand behind them” for the “deliberate and calculated snub”.”Messi should never be allowed to return to Hong Kong. His lies and hypocrisy are disgusting,” she added.Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Lionel Messi took to the field for a friendly against Japan’s Vissel Kobe, enraging Chinese fansMatch organiser Tatler Asia said in a statement that Messi had been contracted to play, unless injured. It added that it was withdrawing its application for a HK$16m government grant. The match had been designated as a major sporting event, which enabled the organisers to access government funding. On the same day as the Japan friendly, Messi said that he “regretted” being unable to play in Hong Kong due to a “swollen and painful” groin injury. “I hope that one day we will have the opportunity to come back and give our best to our fans and friends in Hong Kong,” he told a televised news conference. His post on Chinese social media network Weibo explaining why he hadn’t been able to play in Hong Kong has so far attracted some 142,000 comments. While some were supportive, many reacted angrily, with some calling the Argentine a “conman” and “garbage”. Others accused the Argentine of only wanting to make money off Chinese fans, while pandering to the Japanese. “No need to apologise, just don’t come to China again. Just because you play football well does not mean you are a good person,” one netizen said.Additional reporting by BBC MonitoringRelated TopicsChinaHong KongMore on this storyMessi defends Hong Kong absence after fans booAttributionSportPublished2 days agoMessi mania grips crowd at China’s Workers’ StadiumPublished15 June 2023Top StoriesWorld breaches 1.5C warming threshold for full yearPublished1 hour agoLive. Sunak declines to apologise over Commons trans jibeScotland’s health secretary quits over iPad rowPublished2 minutes agoFeaturesWhy Labour has junked its big money green policyKane on his chase for ‘team trophies’ as well as recordsAttributionSportNorth Koreans working in China ‘exploited like slaves’I rarely saw people like me in lead roles, says One Day starDisney boss betting big on Taylor Swift and Fortnite to boost streaming serviceThe Papers: William ‘gives thanks’ and ‘tone-deaf Tories’Indian player sparks conversation on sexism in chessWe don’t watch from the sidelines like Taylor SwiftImmersive screenings can weaken films – ScorseseElsewhere on the BBC’No one was treating me seriously’The woman who went for viral for claiming to be Madeleine McCann explains her motivesAttributionSoundsA shining performance in Radio 2’s Piano Room!British soul legend Beverley Knight performs at Maida Vale with the BBC Concert OrchestraAttributionSoundsThe cities hidden beneath the waterDive deep and discover real underwater locations all across the worldAttributionBitesizeThe surprising health benefits of doing the plankMichael Mosley explores whether it outshines crunches or sit-ups…AttributionSoundsMost Read1North Tyneside raids over Clapham suspect search2Putin challenger barred from Russia’s election3Kate Garraway ‘a little wobbly’ on return to TV4Climbing Everest? You need to bring your poo back5World breaches 1.5C warming threshold for full year6McCann suspect to stay silent in German rape trial7William ‘gives thanks’ and ‘tone-deaf Tories’8Pakistan cuts mobile internet as country votes9’We are surrounded’: Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous border10China fury as Messi skips HK match, plays in Japan

[ad_1] His post on Chinese social media network Weibo explaining why he hadn’t been able to play in Hong Kong has so far attracted some 142,000 comments. While some were…

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityScience & EnvironmentWorld’s first year-long breach of key 1.5C warming limitPublished5 minutes agocommentsCommentsShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsCOP28Image source, Getty ImagesBy Mark PoyntingBBC News climate reporterFor the first time, global warming has exceeded 1.5C across an entire year, according to the EU’s climate service.World leaders promised in 2015 to try to limit the long-term temperature rise to 1.5C, which is seen as crucial to help avoid the most damaging impacts.This first year-long breach doesn’t break that landmark “Paris agreement”, but it does bring the world closer to doing so in the long-term.Urgent action to cut carbon emissions can still slow warming, scientists say.”This far exceeds anything that is acceptable,” Prof Sir Bob Watson, a former chair of the UN’s climate body, told the BBC Radio 4’s Today Programme.”Look what’s happened this year with only 1.5C – we’ve seen floods, we’ve seen droughts, we’ve seen heatwaves and wildfires all over the world, and we’re starting to see less agricultural productivity and some problems with water quality and quantity.”The period from February 2023 to January 2024 reached 1.52C of warming, according to the EU’s Copernicus Climate Change Service. The following graph shows how that compares with previous years.The latest climate warning comes amid news that the Labour Party is ditching its policy of spending £28bn a year on its green investment plan in a major U-turn. The Conservatives also pushed back on some key targets in September. This means the UK’s two main parties have scaled back the type of pledges that many climate scientists say are needed globally if the worst impacts of warming are to be avoided.Why is the Paris climate agreement still important?A really simple guide to climate changeThe world’s sea surface is also at its highest ever recorded average temperature – yet another sign of the widespread nature of climate records. As the chart below shows, it’s particularly notable given that ocean temperatures don’t normally peak for another month or so.Science groups differ slightly on precisely how much temperatures have increased, but all agree that the world is in by far its warmest period since modern records began – and likely for much longer.Limiting long-term warming to 1.5C above “pre-industrial” levels – before humans started burning large amounts of fossil fuels – has become a key symbol of international efforts to tackle climate change.A landmark UN report in 2018 said that the risks from climate change – such as intense heatwaves, rising sea-levels and loss of wildlife – were much higher at 2C of warming than at 1.5C.Why has 1.5C been broken over the past year?The long-term warming trend is unquestionably being driven by human activities – mainly from burning fossil fuels, which releases planet-warming gases like carbon dioxide. This is also responsible for the vast majority of the warmth over the past year.In recent months, a natural climate-warming phenomenon known as El Niño has also given air temperatures an extra boost, although it would typically only do so by about 0.2C.What are El Niño and La Niña?Global average air temperatures began exceeding 1.5C of warming on an almost daily basis in the second half of 2023, when El Niño began kicking in, and this has continued into 2024. This is shown where the red line is above the dashed line in the graph below.An end to El Niño conditions is expected in a few months, which could allow global temperatures to temporarily stabilise, and then fall slightly, probably back below the 1.5C threshold.But while human activities keep adding to the levels of warming gases in the atmosphere, temperatures will ultimately continue rising in the decades ahead.Is the world warming faster than expected?Can we still limit global warming?At the current rate of emissions, the Paris goal of limiting warming to 1.5C as a long-term average – rather than a single year – could be crossed within the next decade.This would be a hugely symbolic milestone, but researchers say it wouldn’t mark a cliff edge beyond which climate change will spin out of control.The impacts of climate change would continue to accelerate, however with every little increase in warming – something that the extreme heatwaves, droughts, wildfires and floods over the past 12 months have given us a taste of.An extra half a degree – the difference between 1.5C and 2C of global warming – also greatly increases the risks of passing “tipping points”. These are thresholds within the climate system which, if crossed, could lead to rapid and potentially irreversible changes. For example, if the Greenland and West Antarctic Ice Sheets passed a tipping point, their potentially runaway collapse could cause catastrophic rises to global sea-levels over the centuries that followed.But researchers are keen to emphasise that humans can still make a difference to the world’s warming trajectory. The world has made some progress, with green technologies like renewables and electric vehicles booming in many parts of the world. This has meant some of the very worst case scenarios of 4C warming or more this century – thought possible a decade ago – are now considered much less likely, based on current policies and pledges. And perhaps most encouragingly of all, it’s still thought that the world will more or less stop warming once net zero carbon emissions are reached. Effectively halving emissions this decade is seen as particularly crucial.”That means we can ultimately control how much warming the world experiences, based on our choices as a society, and as a planet,” says Zeke Hausfather, a climate scientist at US group Berkeley Earth.”Doom is not inevitable.” Graphics by Erwan Rivault.Sign up for our morning newsletter and get BBC News in your inbox.Related TopicsGreenhouse gas emissionsIntergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeCOP28El NiñoParis climate agreementClimateNet zeroMore on this story2023 confirmed as world’s hottest year on recordPublished9 JanuaryView commentsTop StoriesWorld breaches 1.5C warming threshold for full yearPublished5 minutes agoLive. Labour set to announce end of flagship £28bn green policy’We are surrounded’ – Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous borderPublished10 hours agoFeaturesWhy Labour has junked its big money green policyKane on his chase for ‘team trophies’ as well as recordsAttributionSportNorth Koreans working in China ‘exploited like slaves’I rarely saw people like me in lead roles, says One Day starDisney boss betting big on Taylor Swift and Fortnite to boost streaming serviceThe Papers: William ‘gives thanks’ and ‘tone-deaf Tories’Indian player sparks conversation on sexism in chessWe don’t watch from the sidelines like Taylor SwiftImmersive screenings can weaken films – ScorseseElsewhere on the BBC’No one was treating me seriously’The woman who went for viral for claiming to be Madeleine McCann explains her motivesAttributionSoundsA shining performance in Radio 2’s Piano Room!British soul legend Beverley Knight performs at Maida Vale with the BBC Concert OrchestraAttributionSoundsThe cities hidden beneath the waterDive deep and discover real underwater locations all across the worldAttributionBitesize’It really is walking into the unknown’Leicestershire’s youngest cops take on the front line of crimeAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Putin challenger barred from Russia’s presidential election2McCann suspect to stay silent in German rape trial3World breaches 1.5C warming threshold for full year4William ‘gives thanks’ and ‘tone-deaf Tories’5’We are surrounded’: Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous border6Sex abuser used vapes to groom 14-year-old girl7Pakistan cuts mobile internet as country votes8Men on Viagra may reduce Alzheimer’s risk – study9Heart transplant patient recognised in record books10Kate Garraway ‘a little wobbly’ on return to TV

[ad_1] The last 12 months were the hottest on record, temporarily sending the world past a deeply symbolic mark.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityAsiaChinaIndiaWhy India’s law against cheating could be ineffectivePublished59 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, DipankarImage caption, Students have smuggled in textbooks and notes into the examination centres despite tight securityBy Nikhila HenryBBC News, DelhiIndia’s parliament has passed a stringent new law to prevent cheating in exams for government jobs and admission to public colleges. The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 – which was passed on Tuesday – carries a jail sentence of three to 10 years for those who facilitate cheating. It also carries a fine ranging between 1 million rupees ($12,040; £9,551) and 10 million rupees. The new law does not impose penalties directly on test takers; instead, their punishments will be determined by the rules set forth by their respective testing authorities.A jobs crisis in India is driving workers to IsraelThe law will be applicable to most exams conducted by the federal government and its test agencies. All offences are non-bailable and will be investigated by senior police officials.The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government has said the act will bring “greater transparency, fairness and credibility” as it is the first federal legislation to prevent malpractices in examinations. But critics argue that severe punishment alone won’t effectively address the issue, noting instances of cheating and impersonation already punishable under India’s criminal laws.Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Aspirants protesting against exam paper leaks in India”The new law could prove to be ineffective because coaching centres collude with students to help them pass entrance examination,” says Ghanta Chakrapani, former chairman of a state-run organisation which recruits people for state government jobs. In 2022, India’s top investigative agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), arrested a Russian hacker for reportedly breaching the entrance exam for admission to the prestigious Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs). The hacker allegedly worked for a coaching institute. Cheating is prevalent in India due to the intensely competitive nature of government jobs and top college admission tests, where millions vie for a limited number of positions.Cheating plagues India jobs coveted by millionsFor the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) exam, the entrance test for the federal civil service, over a million people applied last year for just over 1,000 job vacancies. The Joint Entrance Examination (JEE), which determines admissions to IITs, sees tens of thousands of applicants annually for just over 15,000 available seats.In response to exam manipulation, several states have implemented laws to curb cheating. Rajasthan enacted an anti-cheating law two years ago, while Andhra Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh have had such laws since 1998 and 1997, respectively. Last year, Gujarat and Uttarakhand also introduced laws to prevent cheating.Despite the existence of these laws, cheating cases have persisted in each of these states until recently, indicating their limited effectiveness.Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Aspirants waiting to appear for civil service exams in DelhiIndia also reports question paper leaks periodically, leading to cancellation of exams. An investigation by The Indian Express newspaper had found 41 documented cases of question paper leaks in job recruitment exams across 15 states over the last five years.However, “high quantum of punishment cannot be a one stop solution for the cheating menace,” says Jacob Punnoose who worked as a top ranking officer in the Indian police service before his retirement. Cheating can be prevented by tightening security at examination centres, Mr Punnoose says. “It’s possible to use mass surveillance digital technology to prevent cheating by just monitoring students who take the examination.” Indians caught ‘cheating’ in examsIndia, however, has reported an emerging trend of young candidates using inventive and mischievous ways of cheating using digital technology. In Rajasthan some used slippers with embedded Bluetooth devices to share test answers with accomplices outside the examination hall. Recently, 30 candidates were arrested in Tamil Nadu for using Bluetooth earphones to cheat in an Indian customs service examination, reports say.Laws targeting cheating have proven ineffective, partly due to “organised criminals” with influential connections disrupting examinations, say experts. People who facilitate cheating often have political ties. In Karnataka, a police recruitment exam was investigated last year as a governing party leader was accused of facilitating mass cheating at an examination centre, resulting in over 65 arrests.In India, disputes over public examination results can linger for years. Two years ago, violent protests erupted over alleged inaccuracies in the results of a railway recruitment test, leading to the suspension of the exam. Some 700,000 candidates were shortlisted for just over 35,200 posts in this exam.”The new law does not make it difficult to cheat. It just makes those caught, face stringent punishment,” Mr Chakrapani says. Related TopicsAsiaIndiaMore on this storyIndians caught ‘cheating’ in examsPublished19 March 2015A jobs crisis in India is driving workers to IsraelPublished25 JanuaryCheating plagues India jobs coveted by millionsPublished8 February 2023’No shoes or socks’ to stop exam cheatingPublished19 February 2018Top StoriesWorld breaches 1.5C warming threshold for full yearPublished5 hours agoLabour ditches £28bn green investment pledgePublished9 hours ago’We are surrounded’ – Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous borderPublished8 hours agoFeaturesWhy Labour has junked its big money green policyKane on his chase for ‘team trophies’ as well as recordsAttributionSportNorth Koreans working in China ‘exploited like slaves’The Papers: William ‘gives thanks’ and ‘tone-deaf Tories’I rarely saw people like me in lead roles, says One Day starImmersive screenings can weaken films – ScorseseIndian player sparks conversation on sexism in chessWe don’t watch from the sidelines like Taylor SwiftWhy Trump ballot eligibility is before Supreme CourtElsewhere on the BBC’No one was treating me seriously’The woman who went for viral for claiming to be Madeleine McCann explains her motivesAttributionSoundsA shining performance in Radio 2’s Piano Room!British soul legend Beverley Knight performs at Maida Vale with the BBC Concert OrchestraAttributionSoundsThe cities hidden beneath the waterDive deep and discover real underwater locations all across the worldAttributionBitesize’It really is walking into the unknown’Leicestershire’s youngest cops take on the front line of crimeAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Pakistan cuts off mobile internet as country votes2William ‘gives thanks’ and ‘tone-deaf Tories’3McCann suspect to stay silent in German rape trial4World tops 1.5C warming threshold for full year5Labour ditches £28bn green investment pledge6’We are surrounded’: Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous border7Heart transplant patient recognised in record books8Men on Viagra may reduce Alzheimer’s risk – study9Disney boss bets on Taylor Swift and Fortnite10Sex abuser used vapes to groom 14-year-old girl

[ad_1] India’s parliament has passed a new federal law imposing heavy fines and long prison term for cheaters.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityAsiaChinaIndiaSouth Korea: ‘Dior bag scandal’ a political manoeuvre, president saysPublished2 hours agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, VOICE OF SEOUL/YOUTUBEImage caption, South Korea’s first lady has been embroiled in what local media call the ‘Dior bag scandal’By Kelly NgBBC NewsSpy camera footage of South Korea’s first lady accepting a luxury bag gift was leaked as a “political manoeuvre”, President Yoon Suk Yeol said.Mr Yoon said the act was “regrettable” but stopped short of apologising.He has been under pressure to address the issue, which has roiled his ruling party ahead of key elections in April.His first comments on what local media has called the “Dior bag scandal” disappointed citizens and angered the opposition.Late last year, left-wing YouTube channel Voice of Seoul published a video that purportedly showed first lady Kim Keon Hee accepting a 3m won ($2,200; £1,800) Dior bag from a pastor, who filmed the exchange in September 2022 using a camera concealed in his watch.”The video [was made public] at a time when the general election is drawing near, a year after the issue happened, so we can see this as a political manoeuvre.” Mr Yoon told broadcaster KBS.”The fact that she was unable to cold-heartedly reject him was the problem, if one can call it a problem, and it is a little regrettable,” Mr Yoon said.First lady’s Dior bag shakes South Korean politicsSome analysts have said the scandal threatens the prospects of Mr Yoon’s conservative People Power Party in April’s legislative elections. The video was released as his approval ratings were beginning to recover. The opposition Democratic Party said Mr Yoon fell short of the public’s expectations of a sincere apology.”The president’s shameless attitude is hopeless,” the party’s spokesman Kwon Chil-seung said.”It’s hard to say how long we will continue to watch the self-righteousness of a president who refuses to admit fault and apologise to the people,” Mr Kwon said. Some expressed disappointment on X, formerly Twitter. “There was no apology for the Dior bag the whole country was waiting for,” according to one comment.Another X user questioned the significance of Mr Yoon’s apology at this time: “Even if you receive an apology from such a shameless and unwilling authority, what is the meaning of that apology, which you were forced to accept like squeezing apple juice for several months?”Several conservative newspapers, such as Joongang Ilbo and Chosun Ilbo, pointed out that Mr Yoon did not comment on the appropriateness of Ms Kim’s actions.Local publications have reported that the presidential office confirmed receipt of the bag and said that it was “being managed and stored as a property of the government”.A Gallup Korea poll last week showed that Mr Yoon’s approval ratings had fallen to 29%, the lowest in nine months. The scandal involving the 51-year-old first lady was among the reasons respondents cited for their disapproval. The scandal has also caused rifts within Mr Yoon’s party. One party leader compared the first lady with Marie Antoinette, the French queen who is notorious for her extravagant ways.The Dior bag scandal is the latest in a string of controversies surrounding Ms Kim. The opposition has long accused her of being involved in stock price manipulation. Earlier this month, Mr Yoon vetoed a bill calling for his wife to be investigated over these allegations.Last year, Seoul’s government scrapped an expressway project following allegations that its construction would financially benefit Ms Kim’s family by raising the prices of land that they own.Related TopicsAsiaYoon Suk YeolSouth KoreaMore on this storyFirst lady’s Dior bag shakes South Korean politicsPublished25 JanuaryOpposition leader stabbed in neck in South KoreaPublished2 JanuaryStudents sue after exam ends 90 seconds earlyPublished20 December 2023Top StoriesWorld breaches 1.5C warming threshold for full yearPublished4 hours agoLabour ditches £28bn green investment pledgePublished8 hours ago’We are surrounded’: Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous borderPublished7 hours agoFeaturesWhy Labour has junked its big money green policyThe Papers: William ‘gives thanks’ and ‘tone-deaf Tories’North Koreans working in China ‘exploited like slaves’I rarely saw people like me in lead roles, says One Day starImmersive screenings can weaken films – ScorseseKane on his chase for ‘team trophies’ as well as recordsAttributionSportWe don’t watch from the sidelines like Taylor SwiftWhy Trump ballot eligibility is before Supreme CourtIndian player sparks conversation on sexism in chessElsewhere on the BBC’No one was treating me seriously’The woman who went for viral for claiming to be Madeleine McCann explains her motivesAttributionSoundsA shining performance in Radio 2’s Piano Room!British soul legend Beverley Knight performs at Maida Vale with the BBC Concert OrchestraAttributionSoundsThe cities hidden beneath the waterDive deep and discover real underwater locations all across the worldAttributionBitesize’It really is walking into the unknown’Leicestershire’s youngest cops take on the front line of crimeAttributioniPlayerMost Read1William ‘gives thanks’ and ‘tone-deaf Tories’2McCann suspect to stay silent in German rape trial3French actress accuses director of historical rape4World tops 1.5C warming threshold for full year5Labour ditches £28bn green investment pledge6Disney boss bets on Fortnite and Taylor Swift7’We are surrounded’: Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous border8Men on Viagra may reduce Alzheimer’s risk – study9Pakistan cuts off internet access as country votes10US drone kills Iran-backed militia leader in Baghdad

[ad_1] Under fire, Yoon Suk Yeol says it’s “regrettable” that his wife accepted luxury bag as a gift.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaUS Senate bid to salvage Ukraine and Israel aid as border deal crumblesPublished3 hours agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, EPAImage caption, US Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer wants to get the new, revised foreign aid bill passedBy Francesca Gillett in Washington DC & Sam Cabral on Capitol HillBBC NewsUS lawmakers are scrambling to salvage a military aid package for Ukraine and Israel, after the Senate rejected a bipartisan border deal.The failed compromise had bundled US-Mexico border restrictions together with aid to Ukraine and Israel.But the pact, which was four months in the making, collapsed after Donald Trump urged Republicans to block it.Republicans said its immigration reforms did not go far enough, while some Democrats said they went too far.Senators are now trying to fashion a new version of the legislation. Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has put forward a back-up bill, which strips out the immigration measures while leaving the foreign aid intact.The $96bn (£76bn) package includes $60bn of support for Ukraine, $14.1bn in security assistance for Israel – as well as $9.15bn in humanitarian aid for the situations in Israel and Ukraine.Another $2.44bn is in the bill to back US operations in the Red Sea, and $4.83bn is allocated to support US allies in the Indo-Pacific “and deter aggression by the Chinese government”.Senate adjourned until Thursday after becoming mired in negotiations over the revised package.Chuck Schumer, the top Senate Democrat, told reporters he wanted “to give our Republican colleagues the night to figure themselves out”.Read more on the border and Ukraine dealHow the Senate vote unfolded’People will keep dying’: Fentanyl crisis grips Mexico’s border citiesThe original bipartisan border deal was voted down in the Senate on Wednesday afternoon, failing by 50 votes to 49. It needed 60 votes to pass.The $118bn package included about $20bn of funding for the US-Mexico border. Among the most significant elements related to immigration in the 370-page deal was a new federal authority that would have mandated a complete shutdown of the border when migrant numbers at ports of entry reached a certain threshold. In practice, this would have meant that migrants who arrive in the US illegally after that threshold is reached would no longer be allowed to request asylum and would be deported shortly thereafter.But Republicans rejected the measure before any legislative text had been unveiled, arguing its border reforms did not go far enough.Immigration has emerged as the top issue driving Republicans to the polls in support of Mr Trump, who is the frontrunner to face President Joe Biden in the November general election.Mr Trump urged his party to reject the deal, even publicly proclaiming at a recent campaign rally: “Please blame it on me.”As support for the bill fell away, Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson and his leadership team declared the bill “a waste of time” because it would be “dead on arrival” in his chamber.Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell had previously backed and actively participated in negotiations over the bill.But the Kentucky Republican reversed course earlier this week, saying the package “has no real chance of becoming law”, and he voted ‘no’ on Tuesday.The next three most senior Republicans in the upper chamber – John Cornyn of Texas, John Thune of South Dakota and John Barrasso of Wyoming – also voted against the bill.Only four Republicans backed the measure. That included lead negotiator James Lankford of Oklahoma, who reminded colleagues in a futile final pitch that Americans sent them to Washington to “get stuff done and solve problems”.Six Democrats also voted against the bill, mostly in opposition to its border reforms.Speaking at a private fundraiser in New York on Wednesday evening, Mr Biden – who had endorsed the deal – said Republicans were “walking away because they’ve got Donald Trump calling and threatening them”.US military aid to Ukraine has been on hold since December because Congress has not been able to agree to send more. Republicans had said they would only support more aid for Ukraine if they got extra measures to tackle the border crisis – hence why the bipartisan bill, which has now been rejected, was drawn up.The US is, by some stretch, the biggest provider of aid to Ukraine, and Ukraine has warned that the war effort and its public finances are at risk if further Western aid is not forthcoming.Earlier, the White House National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan – who was in Brussels for talks with the head of Nato – said the US “can and will” deliver the needed aid despite a “lot of toing and froing” in Congress.On Tuesday, Republicans in the House of Representatives tried spinning off the Israel aid into its own package, but it failed after Democrats overwhelmingly rejected it.Related TopicsMexico–US borderDonald TrumpUS politicsUnited States SenateMigrationJoe BidenMore on this storySenate unveils border and Ukraine dealPublished2 days ago’People will keep dying’: Fentanyl crisis grips Mexico’s border citiesPublished1 day agoTop StoriesWorld tops 1.5C warming threshold for full yearPublished3 hours agoLabour ditches £28bn green investment pledgePublished7 hours ago’We are surrounded’: Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous borderPublished6 hours agoFeaturesWhy Labour has junked its big money green policyThe Papers: William ‘gives thanks’ and ‘tone-deaf Tories’North Koreans working in China ‘exploited like slaves’I rarely saw people like me in lead roles, says One Day starImmersive screenings can weaken films – ScorseseWe don’t watch from the sidelines like Taylor SwiftWhy Trump ballot eligibility is before Supreme CourtIndian player sparks conversation on sexism in chessCould the Houthis sabotage undersea cables?Elsewhere on the BBC’No one was treating me seriously’The woman who went for viral for claiming to be Madeleine McCann explains her motivesAttributionSoundsA shining performance in Radio 2’s Piano Room!British soul legend Beverley Knight performs at Maida Vale with the BBC Concert OrchestraAttributionSoundsThe cities hidden beneath the waterDive deep and discover real underwater locations all across the worldAttributionBitesize’It really is walking into the unknown’Leicestershire’s youngest cops take on the front line of crimeAttributioniPlayerMost Read1US baby’s decapitation in delivery ruled a homicide2William ‘gives thanks’ and ‘tone-deaf Tories’3French actress accuses director of historical rape4McCann suspect to stay silent in German rape trial5Labour ditches £28bn green investment pledge6’We are surrounded’: Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous border7World tops 1.5C warming threshold for full year8Men on Viagra may reduce Alzheimer’s risk – study9Disney boss bets on Fortnite and Taylor Swift10US drone kills Iran-backed militia leader in Baghdad

[ad_1] US military aid to Ukraine has been on hold since December because Congress has not been able to agree to send more. Republicans had said they would only support…

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaEcuador becomes second Latin American state to decriminalise euthanasiaPublished36 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, Getty ImagesBy Patrick JacksonBBC NewsEcuador has become the second country in Latin America after Colombia to decriminalise euthanasia.Its constitutional court voted seven to two in favour of allowing doctors to help a patient die. The court said the crime of homicide would no longer apply to clinicians working to preserve the right to a dignified life.The lawsuit was brought by a woman suffering from a neurological disease known as ALS. She had told the court in November that she was experiencing pain, loneliness and cruelty, and wanted to rest in peace. The Roman Catholic Church, to which most Ecuadoreans belong, remains staunchly opposed to euthanasia. Colombia decriminalised euthanasia in 1997.ALS sufferer Paola Roldán, who is confined to her bed, brought her lawsuit in August, AFP news agency reports.Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most common form of motor neurone disease, a rare condition that progressively damages parts of the nervous system, leading to muscle weakness, often with visible wasting.Ms Roldán contested an article of the penal code which made euthanasia a crime of homicide carrying a sentence of between 10 and 13 years in prison, AFP says.”I want to rest in peace,” she told a court hearing in November via video link. “What I experience is painful, lonely and cruel.”The court ruled that “it would be unreasonable to impose an obligation to stay alive on someone who is going through this situation”.”Every human being can make free and informed decisions when their personal development is affected which… includes the option of ending the intense suffering caused by a serious and irreversible bodily injury or a serious and incurable illness,” it said. After the ruling, Ms Roldán told reporters that her country had become a “little more welcoming, freer and more dignified”.”The fight for human rights is never a paved road,” she added.Her father Francisco Roldán told reporters he had mixed feelings because while Paola had been able to achieve a “historic event” and a “legacy for Ecuadorian society” his family had a “half-broken heart because there could be an outcome… which is the death of my daughter”.”We are supporting Paola,” he said.A bill on euthanasia will now have to be drafted and approved by Congress, a process that could take many months, but Ms Roldán’s lawyer Farith Simon argued that the ruling was “immediately enforceable”.Related TopicsMotor neurone diseaseEuthanasia and assisted dyingColombiaEcuadorMore on this storyPortuguese MPs vote to allow limited euthanasiaPublished12 May 2023Canada wrestles with euthanasia for the mentally illPublished14 January 2023Spain legalises euthanasiaPublished18 March 2021Top StoriesWorld tops 1.5C warming threshold for full yearPublished2 hours agoLabour ditches £28bn green investment pledgePublished6 hours ago’We are surrounded’: Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous borderPublished5 hours agoFeaturesWhy Labour has junked its big money green policyThe Papers: William ‘gives thanks’ and ‘tone-deaf Tories’North Koreans working in China ‘exploited like slaves’I rarely saw people like me in lead roles, says One Day starImmersive screenings can weaken films – ScorseseWe don’t watch from the sidelines like Taylor SwiftWhy Trump ballot eligibility is before Supreme CourtIndian player sparks conversation on sexism in chessCould the Houthis sabotage undersea cables?Elsewhere on the BBC’No one was treating me seriously’The woman who went for viral for claiming to be Madeleine McCann explains her motivesAttributionSoundsA shining performance in Radio 2’s Piano Room!British soul legend Beverley Knight performs at Maida Vale with the BBC Concert OrchestraAttributionSoundsThe cities hidden beneath the waterDive deep and discover real underwater locations all across the worldAttributionBitesize’It really is walking into the unknown’Leicestershire’s youngest cops take on the front line of crimeAttributioniPlayerMost Read1William ‘gives thanks’ and ‘tone-deaf Tories’2US baby’s decapitation in delivery ruled a homicide3French actress accuses director of historical rape4McCann suspect to stay silent in German rape trial5Labour ditches £28bn green investment pledge6’We are surrounded’: Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous border7World tops 1.5C warming threshold for full year8Men on Viagra may reduce Alzheimer’s risk – study9US drone kills Iran-backed militia leader in Baghdad10Disney boss bets on Fortnite and Taylor Swift

[ad_1] Ecuador’s constitutional court votes seven to two in favour of allowing doctors to help a patient die.

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityAsiaChinaIndiaPakistan election: Voting begins in election tainted by rigging claimsPublished52 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, EPAImage caption, Election posters for the MQM-P (kite) and Jamaat-e-Islami (scales) parties are seen here in KarachiBy Flora DruryBBCTens of millions of Pakistanis are heading to the polls to vote in a new government amid soaring inflation, rising violence and claims of rigging.The election comes almost two years since the previous prime minister, cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan, was ousted in a no-confidence vote.Three-time PM Nawaz Sharif is on the ballot. Many analysts say it’s Pakistan’s least credible election yet.Pakistan also suspended mobile services minutes before voting began. Both calls and data services have been suspended, though Wifi networks still appear to be working.An interior ministry spokesman said the measure was warranted for security reasons, citing recent incidents of terror in the country. Bomb blasts killed 28 people in the restive Balochistan province on Wednesday, a day before the vote. Strict rules around election coverage – including what can be said about candidates, campaigning and opinion polls – remain in place until the end of voting at 1700 local time (1200 GMT). Results have to be released within two weeks.Who is really pulling the strings in a divided Pakistan? A jailed star and former convict: Pakistan’s election, explainedAs many as 128 million people are registered to cast their votes, with almost half under the age of 35. They will choose between more than 5,000 candidates – of whom just 313 are women.The Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) (PML-N) and the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) were considered the two major parties going into the vote.However, picking out candidates from Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party has been made more difficult, after it was banned from using the cricket bat symbol under which all its candidates run. Electoral symbols play a key role in a country where more than 40% are unable to read.Image source, EPAImage caption, Nawaz Sharif (left) and Bilawal Bhutto can stand – but Imran Khan (right) is in jail and can’t runThe PTI allege other tactics have been used to prevent their candidates winning seats as well, including being locked up, banned from holding rallies and forced underground.Khan was jailed on corruption charges and is barred from standing. He is serving at least 14 years in prison, having been sentenced in three separate cases in the space of five days last week. He still faces some 170 charges in different cases, his lawyers say. The PTI alleges interference by Pakistan’s powerful military, with whom Khan is said to have fallen out before his fall from favour.But people will be able to vote for Nawaz Sharif – the PML-N leader, who at the time of the last election was beginning a sentence for corruption. The former PM was ousted in a 1999 military coup and had his third term cut short in 2017 – but he recently returned from self-imposed exile and had his lifetime ban on holding office, along with his criminal record, wiped clean at the end of last year, allowing him to stand for what would be a record fourth term.However, whether any party can win a majority – which requires 169 seats in the 336-seat National Assembly – is not yet clear.Millions have been hit hard by the country’s economic woes, which were exacerbated by devastating floods in 2022. Inflation is soaring, and people are struggling to pay their bills.The cricket star and former PM dividing PakistanPakistan’s king of comebacks looks set to win againAcross the country rising violence is also a concern. According to the Islamabad-based Center for Research and Security Studies (CRSS), 2023 saw violent incidents increase for the third year in a row in Pakistan, with the most recorded fatalities – including security forces, militants and civilians – since 2017.Image source, ReutersImage caption, Who voters blame for the economic mess will be crucial in deciding the winnerBeing involved in politics itself has proved dangerous. On Wednesday – less than 24 hours before the first voters cast their ballots – two separate attacks on candidates’ offices left more than 28 people dead in Balochistan province.Officials are also aware there could be further attacks on voting day itself. Border crossings with Afghanistan and Iran will be closed for cargo and pedestrians on Thursday to “ensure full security” during polling, a spokesman from Pakistan’s foreign ministry said. Tens of thousands of military troops and paramilitary soldiers have also been deployed to polling stations across the country. The Election Commission of Pakistan has categorised half of the 90,675 polling stations as either “sensitive”, meaning there is a risk of violence, or “most sensitive”, indicating a higher risk. The classifications are based on the region’s security situation and history of electoral violence.A high turnout will be key to the PTI’s chances, many analysts say. How to tackle, and who to blame for, the country’s economic crisis will be high in voters’ minds. Related TopicsPakistanImran KhanNawaz SharifMore on this storyBomb blasts kill dozens day before Pakistan votePublished5 hours agoHow Imran Khan plans to win an election from jailPublished4 days agoImran Khan and wife jailed for illegal marriagePublished4 days agoTop StoriesWorld tops 1.5C warming threshold for full yearPublished1 hour agoLabour ditches £28bn green investment pledgePublished5 hours ago’We are surrounded’: Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous borderPublished4 hours agoFeaturesWhy Labour has junked its big money green policyThe Papers: William ‘gives thanks’ and ‘tone-deaf Tories’North Koreans working in China ‘exploited like slaves’I rarely saw people like me in lead roles, says One Day starImmersive screenings can weaken films – ScorseseWe don’t watch from the sidelines like Taylor SwiftWhy Trump ballot eligibility is before Supreme CourtIndian player sparks conversation on sexism in chessCould the Houthis sabotage undersea cables?Elsewhere on the BBC’No one was treating me seriously’The woman who went for viral for claiming to be Madeleine McCann explains her motivesAttributionSoundsA shining performance in Radio 2’s Piano Room!British soul legend Beverley Knight performs at Maida Vale with the BBC Concert OrchestraAttributionSoundsThe cities hidden beneath the waterDive deep and discover real underwater locations all across the worldAttributionBitesize’It really is walking into the unknown’Leicestershire’s youngest cops take on the front line of crimeAttributioniPlayerMost Read1William ‘gives thanks’ and ‘tone-deaf Tories’2McCann suspect to stay silent in German rape trial3French actress accuses director of historical rape4Labour ditches £28bn green investment pledge5World tops 1.5C warming threshold for full year6’We are surrounded’: Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous border7Men on Viagra may reduce Alzheimer’s risk – study8US drone kills Iran-backed militia leader in Baghdad9Amber snow and ice warnings issued by Met Office10Disney boss bets on Fortnite and Taylor Swift

[ad_1] Khan was jailed on corruption charges and is barred from standing. He is serving at least 14 years in prison, having been sentenced in three separate cases in the…

Other Story

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaCould you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New YorkersThis video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Could you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New YorkersCloseJury selection is under way in Donald Trump’s New York City hush-money trial, with hundreds of people selected as potential jurors.They must answer a questionnaire to determine, among other things, if they can be impartial about the former president.The BBC asked some of those questions to Manhattan residents.SubsectionUS & CanadaPublished50 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRead descriptionExplore moreCould you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New Yorkers. Video, 00:02:16Could you be a fair juror for Trump? We asked New YorkersSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished50 minutes ago2:16Up Next. A view from inside court for Trump’s blockbuster trial. Video, 00:01:15A view from inside court for Trump’s blockbuster trialSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished19 hours agoUp Next1:15Press, police and protesters: Outside Trump courthouse. Video, 00:01:12Press, police and protesters: Outside Trump courthouseSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished1 day ago1:12Trump’s ‘perp walk’ moment explained in 60 seconds. Video, 00:01:00Trump’s ‘perp walk’ moment explained in 60 secondsSubsectionUS & CanadaPublished31 March 20231:00Editor’s recommendationsCopenhagen stock exchange engulfed by huge fire. Video, 00:01:03Copenhagen stock exchange engulfed by huge fireSubsectionEuropePublished12 hours ago1:03Moment spire collapses at Copenhagen stock exchange. Video, 00:00:43Moment spire collapses at Copenhagen stock exchangeSubsectionEuropePublished11 hours ago0:43Dormice ladders built in the Forest of Dean. Video, 00:00:51Dormice ladders built in the Forest of DeanSubsectionGloucestershirePublished1 day ago0:51Liz Truss: The world was safer under Trump. Video, 00:00:35Liz Truss: The world was safer under TrumpSubsectionUK PoliticsPublished22 hours ago0:35Huge fires blaze along Miami highway. Video, 00:00:33Huge fires blaze along Miami highwaySubsectionUS & CanadaPublished12 hours ago0:33Watch: Georgia opposition leader punches MP during debate. Video, 00:00:34Watch: Georgia opposition leader punches MP during debateSubsectionEuropePublished21 hours ago0:34Wheelie bins fly and a caravan overturns in strong wind. Video, 00:00:24Wheelie bins fly and a caravan overturns in strong windSubsectionStoke & StaffordshirePublished1 day ago0:24Hannah Waddingham calls out demanding paparazzi. Video, 00:00:28Hannah Waddingham calls out demanding paparazziSubsectionEntertainment & ArtsPublished1 day ago0:28Endangered California condor chicks hatched in LA. Video, 00:01:28Endangered California condor chicks hatched in LASubsectionUS & CanadaPublished1 day ago1:28

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityUKEnglandN. IrelandScotlandAlbaWalesCymruIsle of ManGuernseyJerseyLocal NewsFirst product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealedPublished11 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, ReutersImage caption, Meghan pictured at a polo match in Florida last weekBy Sean CoughlanRoyal correspondentA first glimpse of the new business venture from the Duchess of Sussex has been teased on social media, with pictures of a jar of strawberry jam.In a bid to preserve a sense of mystery, the jam from the new American Riviera Orchard brand seemed to be spread among friends and influencers.Fashion designer Tracy Robbins posted a picture of the jam on Instagram.It was numbered “17 of 50”, suggesting the number of recipients of this first fruit of the new business.The arrival of Meghan’s new California-based lifestyle brand had been signalled on social media last month and this suggests that it will be selling food products.What do we know about Meghan’s new brand?Five things about Harry and Meghan’s brand revampWhy did Harry and Meghan leave the Royal Family?There seemed to be have been something of a re-launch for Meghan and husband Prince Harry’s brands and businesses this year, beginning with the overhaul of their regal-looking website under the sussex.com label.Their latest projects seem to be moving away from a previous focus on their time as working royals, such as their Netflix film Harry and Meghan and Prince Harry’s memoir Spare.The hint about the strawberry jam from Meghan’s American Riviera Orchard brand seems to fit with the couple’s latest Netflix plans.Meghan is going to launch a Netflix show which will “celebrate the joys of cooking and gardening, entertaining, and friendship”.Prince Harry will be involved in another Netflix venture showing the inside track on the world of polo. That’s the equestrian sport, not the mints.Delfina Blaquier, married to Prince Harry’s polo-playing friend Nacho Figueras, also posted a picture of the new jam, with hers labelled “10 of 50”.The social media trail for American Riviera Orchard evokes a sense of the couple’s home in California – and this soft launch for the jam show pictures of the jars in a sunny basket of lemons.It’s not known how much items from the new lifestyle brand will cost. Although there are already plenty of other royals getting into jams. Visitors to the gift shops in royal palaces can get a Buckingham Palace Strawberry Preserve for £3.95 or Windsor Castle Fine Cut Seville Orange Marmalade, also for £3.95.On both sides of the Atlantic they seem to be conserving their finances.Related TopicsUK Royal FamilyMeghan, Duchess of SussexMore on this storyWhat we know about Meghan’s regal lifestyle brandPublished16 MarchMeghan launches surprise new lifestyle brandPublished14 MarchTop StoriesMPs back smoking ban for those born after 2009Published8 minutes agoMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished2 hours agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished7 hours agoFeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlinePlaying Coachella after cancer emotional, says DJHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Nursery boss ‘killed baby she strapped to beanbag’2Birmingham Airport flights disrupted by incident3Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge4First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed5MPs back smoking ban for those born after 20096Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference7Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames8Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline9Marten a ‘lioness’ who ‘loved her cubs’, court told10Sons of McCartney and Lennon release joint single

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaSupreme Court hears 6 Jan case that may hit Trump trialPublished2 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsUS Capitol riotsImage source, Brent StirtonImage caption, Hundreds of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol after holding a “Stop the Steal” rally on 6 January, 2021By Nadine YousifBBC NewsThe US Supreme Court have begun hearing a case that could undo charges for those who stormed the Capitol in 2021. It focuses on whether a 2002 federal law created to prevent corporate misconduct could apply to individuals involved in the 6 January riots. More than 350 people have been charged in the incident under that law, which carries a 20-year prison penalty.Donald Trump faces the same charge in the pending federal case accusing him of election interference. The law makes it a crime to “corruptly” obstruct or impede an official proceeding. On Tuesday, Supreme Court Justices heard two hours of arguments over the law’s interpretation. However, it remained unclear how they would rule. A lawyer for a man who stormed the Capitol and was prosecuted under the law argued before the Justices that “a host of felony and misdemeanour” crimes already exist to prosecute his clients actions.The 2002 law passed in the wake of the Enron accounting scandal, Jeffrey Green said, was not one of them. US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar counterargued that rioters deliberately attempted “to prevent Congress from certifying the results of the election,” therefore obstructing an official proceeding. Both fielded sceptical questions from the Justices. At one point, Mr Green argued that there is no historical precedent in which the law was used to prosecute demonstrators.Justice Sonia Sotomayor replied: “We’ve never had a situation before where (there was an attempt) to stop a proceeding violently, so I am not sure what a lack of history proves.”On the other hand, Ms Prelogar fielded questions from Justice Neil Gorusch on whether the law could then be stretched to apply to a “sit-in that disrupts a trial” or “a heckler” at the State of the Union Address. “Would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify for 20 years in federal prison?” he asked, appearing to reference an incident in which Jamaal Bowman, Democrat House representative, pressed a fire alarm in the Capitol.How the top court rules could have wide-ranging effects on the hundreds of people charged, convicted or sentenced under the law, as well as the prosecution of Mr Trump. Here is a breakdown of the key players and the law being argued: What is the 2002 federal law at the centre of the trial?The law is called the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. It was passed in response to the Enron scandal in the early 2000s, after it was exposed that those involved had engaged in massive fraud and shredding documents. It criminalizes the destruction of evidence – like records or documents. But it also penalises anyone who “otherwise obstructs, influences or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so.” How has it been used in response to the 6 January riots?Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) has brought obstruction charges against those who participated in the storming of the Capitol. Federal prosecutors argue they did so to impede Congress’ certification of the presidential electoral vote count to cement Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election. Therefore, the latter portion of the law that deals with obstructing an “official proceeding” would apply, the DoJ says. Who is challenging the law’s use in this case, and why? The Supreme Court is hearing a challenge to the law’s application brought forward by a former Pennsylvania police officer.Joseph Fischer was charged under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act with obstruction of a congressional proceeding on 6 January, as well as assaulting a police officer and disorderly conduct. His lawyers argue that prosecutors overreached with applying the Act, which they say deals explicitly with destroying or tampering with evidence integral to an investigation. Those who challenge the law’s application in 6 January cases also argue that a broad interpretation of the law would allow the prosecution of lobbyists or protestors who disrupt matters in Congress.How could the Supreme Court ruling impact Trump?The former president is charged under the very same law in a federal case accusing him of working to overturn the results of the 2020 election, which he lost to Mr Biden.If Supreme Court justices rule that the law does not apply to the 6 January rioters, Mr Trump could seek dismissal of half the charges he faces in that case.It also could be seen as a political win for the former president, who is seeking re-election in November, as he repeatedly has accused prosecutors of overreach. A final ruling is not expected until June. Related TopicsUS Capitol riotsDonald TrumpMore on this storySupreme Court to hear appeal over Capitol riot chargePublished13 December 2023A very simple guide to Trump’s indictmentsPublished25 August 2023Supreme Court asked to rule on Trump’s immunityPublished12 December 2023Top StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished1 hour agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished5 hours agoNo liberty in addiction, says health secretary on smoking banPublished4 minutes agoFeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2Birmingham Airport suspends flights over incident3First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed4Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference5Marten a ‘lioness’ who ‘loved her cubs’, court told6Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline7Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames8No liberty in addiction, says minister on smoking ban9Sons of McCartney and Lennon release joint single10Boy, 4, dies after fire at family home in Wigan

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaNational Conservatism Conference: Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels eventPublished4 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, ReutersImage caption, Nigel Farage said the decision to shut the conference down was as an attempt to stifle free speechBy Nick Beake in Brussels and Laura GozziBBC NewsBrussels police have been ordered to shut down a conference attended by right-wing politicians across Europe, including Nigel Farage and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.Organisers say the National Conservatism Conference in the Belgian capital is continuing, but guests are no longer allowed to enter. Local authorities had raised concerns over public safety.A UK spokeswoman called reports of police action “extremely disturbing”. She said that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was a “strong supporter and advocator for free speech” and that he was “very clear that cancelling events or preventing attendance and no-platforming speakers is damaging to free speech and to democracy as a result”.Alexander De Croo, the Belgian prime minister, said that the shutting down of the conference was “unacceptable”.Referring to the fact that it was the local mayor, Emir Kir, who opposed the conference, Mr De Croo added that while municipal autonomy was a cornerstone of Belgium’s democracy it could “never overrule the Belgian constitution guaranteeing the freedom of speech”. “Banning political meetings is unconstitutional. Full stop,” Mr De Croo wrote on X.In a message to organisers, Mr Kir had said some of the attendees of Tuesday’s conference held anti-gay and anti-abortion views. “Among these personalities there are several particularly from the right-conservative, religious right and European extreme right,” his statement said.Mr Kir also wrote on X: “The far right is not welcome.”Nigel Farage, who took to the stage this morning, told the BBC the decision to close down the conference because there were homophobes in the audience was “cobblers”, and that he condemned the decision as an attempt to stifle free speech. “Thank God For Brexit”, he said.Organised by a think-tank called the Edmund Burke Foundation, the National Conservatism Conference is a global movement which espouses what it describes as traditional values, which it claims are being “undermined and overthrown”. It also opposes further European integration.The conference said it aimed to bring together “public figures, journalists, scholars and students” who understood the connection between conservatism and the idea of nationhood and national traditions. French far-right politician Eric Zemmour, arriving for the conference after police had blocked the entrance, told journalists that Mr Kir was “using the police as a private militia to prevent… Europeans from taking part freely”.Organisers said Mr Zemmour was not allowed into the venue and that his address would be postponed.Former UK Home Secretary Suella Braverman and far-right French politician Eric Zemmour were listed as keynote speakers. The National Conservatism Conference reportedly started around 08:00 (06:00 GMT) on Tuesday and carried on for three hours until police showed up and asked the organisers to make attendees leave.Later, organisers wrote on X: “The police are not letting anyone in. People can leave, but they cannot return. Delegates have limited access to food and water, which are being prevented from delivery. Is this what city mayor Emir Kir is aiming for?”Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban and the former Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki were due to speak tomorrow. Earlier, the organisers said on X that they would challenge the order to shut the conference down. “The police entered the venue on our invitation, saw the proceedings and the press corps, and quickly withdrew. Is it possible they witnessed how peaceful the event is?,” they wrote on X.The Claridge event space – located near Brussels’s European Quarter – can host up to 850 people. Around 250 people were in attendance on Tuesday afternoon.Mohamed Nemri, the owner of Claridge, told the BBC he had decided to host the event because “we don’t reject any party…. even if we don’t have the same opinion. That’s normal”.”I am Muslim and people have different opinion and that’s it. We are living in a freedom country. I’d like to people to talk freely,” he added.It is the third venue that was supposed to hold the event, after the previous two fell through. Belgian media reported that one venue pulled out after pressure by a group called the “Antifascist coordination of Belgium”.Related TopicsBelgiumTop StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished43 minutes agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished5 hours agoLive. US expects to impose further sanctions on Iran ‘in the coming days’FeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed3Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference4Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline5Superdry boss hits back at ‘not cool’ criticism6Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames7MPs to vote on smoking ban for those born after 20098Stabbed TV presenter ‘feeling much better’9Sons of McCartney and Lennon release joint single10Baby hurt in Sydney stabbing out of intensive care

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaNasa says part of International Space Station crashed into Florida homePublished40 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingImage source, NASAImage caption, The recovered object was part of a stanchion used to mount batteries to a cargo palletBy Max MatzaBBC NewsUS space agency Nasa confirmed that an object that crashed into a home in Florida earlier this month was part of the International Space Station (ISS). The metal object was jettisoned from the orbiting outpost in March 2021, Nasa said on Monday after analysing the sample at the Kennedy Space Center.The 1.6lb (0.7kg) metal object tore through two layers of ceiling after re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. Homeowner Alejandro Otero said his son was nearly injured by the impact. Nasa said the object was part of some 5,800lbs of hardware that was dumped by the station after it had new lithium-ion batteries installed. “The hardware was expected to fully burn up during entry through Earth’s atmosphere on March 8, 2024. However, a piece of hardware survived and impacted a home in Naples, Florida,” the agency said.The debris was determined to be part of a stanchion used to mount batteries on a cargo pallet. The object, made from metal alloy Inconel, has dimensions of 4in by 1.6in (10.1cm by 4cm).Mr Otero told CBS affiliate Wink-TV that the device created a “tremendous sound” as it blasted into his home.”It almost hit my son. He was two rooms over and heard it all,” he said.”I was shaking. I was completely in disbelief. What are the chances of something landing on my house with such force to cause so much damage,” Mr Otero continued.”I’m super grateful that nobody got hurt.”According to Nasa, the ISS will “perform a detailed investigation” on how the debris survived burn-up.What’s the risk of being hit by falling space debris?Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No it’s more space junkSpace junk has been a growing a problem. Earlier this month, sky watchers in California watched mysterious golden streaks moving through the night sky.US officials later determined that the light show was caused by burning debris from a Chinese rocket re-entering earth’s orbit.In February, a Chinese satellite known as “Object K” burned up as it re-entered the atmosphere over Hawaii.Last year, a barnacle-covered giant metal dome found on a Western Australian beach was identified as a component of an Indian rocket. There are plans to display it alongside chunks of Nasa’s Skylab, which crashed in Australia in 1979. This video can not be playedTo play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.Media caption, Object thought to be a satellite burns up on re-entering Earth’s atmosphereRelated TopicsSpace debrisNasaFloridaUnited StatesMore on this storyIs it a bird? Is it a plane? No it’s more space junkPublished3 AprilRobot dog trains to walk on Moon in Oregon trialsPublished3 days agoTop StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished50 minutes agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished4 hours agoLive. US expects to impose further sanctions on Iran ‘in the coming days’FeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed3Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference4Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline5Superdry boss hits back at ‘not cool’ criticism6Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames7MPs to vote on smoking ban for those born after 20098Stabbed TV presenter ‘feeling much better’9Baby hurt in Sydney stabbing out of intensive care10Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice forever

BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaFormer Marine jailed for nine years for bombing abortion clinicPublished7 minutes agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsUS abortion debateImage source, CBSBy Max MatzaBBC NewsA former US Marine has been jailed for nine years for firebombing a California Planned Parenthood clinic and plotting other attacks to spark a “race war”.Chance Brannon, 24, pleaded guilty to the March 2022 attack on the healthcare clinic, which provides abortions in some of its locations.He also plotted to attack Jewish people and an LGBT pride event taking place at Dodger Stadium in Los Angeles. At the time of his arrest, he was an active duty member of the US Marines. Prosecutors said Brannon was a neo-Nazi who frequently spoke of “cleansing” the US of “particular ethnic groups”. In November, Brannon pleaded guilty to conspiracy, destruction of property, possession of an explosive and intentionally damaging a reproductive health services facility.Kristen Clarke, the assistant attorney general for the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, said the attack “was designed to terrorise patients seeking reproductive healthcare and the people who provide it”.The explosion damaged the front entrance to the clinic in Costa Mesa, Orange County. No one was injured.However, Mehtab Syed, of the FBI’s Los Angeles field office, said Brannon’s “deep-rooted hatred and extremist views… could have killed innocent people”. Mr Syed added that Brannon plotted to rob Jewish residents in the Hollywood Hills, and had also discussed plans to attack the power grid. Further to this, in 2022, Mr Syed said Brannon, of San Juan Capistrano, placed calls to two US “adversaries” hoping to offer himself as a “mole” providing US intelligence.Two co-defendants, Tibet Ergul and Xavier Batten, have pleaded guilty to similar charges and will be sentenced next month.According to the National Abortion Federation, a group representing US abortion providers, there was a “sharp increase” in violence against clinics in 2022. Related TopicsAbortionUS abortion debateUnited StatesCaliforniaMore on this storyWhat is Planned Parenthood?Published25 September 2015Top StoriesMuslim student loses school prayer ban challengePublished53 minutes agoBowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelinePublished3 hours agoLive. Israel demands sanctions on Iranian missile projectFeaturesJeremy Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifelineIranians on edge as leaders say ‘Tel Aviv is our battleground’A really, really big election with nearly a billion votersWhat is the smoking ban and how will it work?Martin Tyler: I nearly lost my voice foreverWho are the millions of Britons not working?How to register to vote for the local elections ahead of midnight deadlineMeteorite ‘repeatedly transformed’ on space journeyHow the Alec Baldwin fatal film set shooting unfoldedElsewhere on the BBCFrom weight loss to prolonging lifeIs intermittent fasting actually good for you? James Gallagher investigatesAttributionSoundsCould Nina shake up the unspoken rules of modern dating?Brand new comedy about love, friendship and being your own selfAttributioniPlayerWill the UK introduce tough anti-tobacco laws?Under new plans, anyone turning 15 from this year would be banned from buying cigarettesAttributionSoundsCan William Wisting find the truth?The Norwegian detective returns, tackling more grisly cold casesAttributioniPlayerMost Read1Muslim student loses school prayer ban challenge2Police told to shut down right-wing Brussels conference3Superdry boss hits back at ‘not cool’ criticism4First product of Meghan’s lifestyle brand revealed5Bowen: Iran’s attack on Israel offers Netanyahu a lifeline6Historic Copenhagen stock exchange goes up in flames7MPs to vote on smoking ban for those born after 20098Stabbed TV presenter ‘feeling much better’9William to return to duties after Kate diagnosis10Baby hurt in Sydney stabbing out of intensive care