BBC HomepageSkip to contentAccessibility HelpYour accountLiveNotificationsHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeMore menuMore menuSearch BBCHomeNewsSportWeatheriPlayerSoundsBitesizeCBBCCBeebiesFoodClose menuBBC NewsMenuHomeIsrael-Gaza warCost of LivingWar in UkraineClimateUKWorldBusinessPoliticsCultureMoreTechScienceHealthFamily & EducationIn PicturesNewsbeatBBC VerifyDisabilityWorldAfricaAsiaAustraliaEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle EastUS & CanadaUS Supreme Court sceptical of Colorado’s move to bar Donald Trump from ballotPublished2 hours agoShareclose panelShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingRelated TopicsUS election 2024Image source, Getty ImagesBy Sam Cabral & Matt MurphyBBC News, at the Supreme Court and in WashingtonThe US Supreme Court appeared sceptical of Colorado’s move to bar Donald Trump from the state’s presidential primary, during tough questioning on Thursday.The ex-president was removed from the ballot by Colorado’s top court in December under the 14th Amendment. At the hearing, justices grilled the attorney defending the move about its constitutionality, its real-world consequences and defining “insurrection”.It is unclear when the court will rule.Mr Trump, who did not attend the hearing, remains the overwhelming favourite to clinch the Republican nomination for president and set-up a rematch with President Joe Biden in November. The legal challenge hinges on a Civil War-era constitutional amendment that bans anyone who has “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” from holding federal office.In its judgement in December, the Colorado Supreme Court said Mr Trump’s actions during the 2021 Capitol riot amounted to insurrection, and the state’s attorney repeated that claim on Thursday. Most of the tough questioning went to lawyer Jonathan Murray, representing the five Coloradoans who originally sued to kick Mr Trump from the ballot.One of the three court members nominated by Mr Trump, conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, challenged him about the potential “disenfranchising effect” of kicking Mr Trump from the ballot, by not allowing citizens to cast their votes as they wanted.Mr Murray said “the reason we’re here is that President Trump tried to disenfranchise 80 million Americans who voted against him” during the violence on 6 January 2021, where rioters tried to stop congress from certifying that Mr Biden won the 2020 election.Mr Trump’s team fought back against that allegation, telling justices that the event was “a riot, not an insurrection”. “The events were shameful, criminal, violent, all of those things but did not qualify as an insurrection as that term is used in Section 3,” Mr Trump’s attorney Jason Mitchell told the court. Justices on both wings of the court appeared reluctant to uphold the Colorado ban, subjecting Mr Murray to a barrage of complex legal queries as the morning went on. Chief Justice John Roberts observed that if the court upheld the Colorado ruling it could unleash chaos on the US political system by granting states the unilateral power to strike candidates from the ballot. “It will come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election. That’s a pretty daunting consequence,” he said. And Justice Elena Kagan appeared to agree, noting: “I think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the United States.”Enforcing the 14th amendment would have “to be federal, national means,” she suggested.Voters react to Trump being kicked off Colorado’s ballotWhat is the 14th AmendmentHow big are Donald Trump’s legal problems?But Trump’s team were also subjected to a grilling by the justices, who challenged attorney Jonathan Mitchell on his claims that the 14th Amendment didn’t apply to the presidency. Mr Trump’s team have long insisted that the term “officer of the United States” outlined in the provision can only apply to an appointed official, not the elected president. Justice Amy Comey Barrett, a conservative also appointed to the court by Mr Trump, expressed a heavy scepticism when examining the Trump team’s claims that the 14th Amendment did not apply to the presidency. Nonetheless, it appears unlikely that the court will uphold the initial Colorado ruling. Robert Tsai, a Boston University constitutional law professor, told the BBC that the state’s ruling “is toast”. The argument that Prof Tsai said most justices seemed to be attracted to was the idea that the power to remove presidential candidate from a ballot under Section 3 belonged to congress, not the states.The court has not said when it will issue its decision, but it is expected soon. The court expedited the case and is under pressure to rule before 5 March, when Colorado holds its primary.Related TopicsColoradoUS Supreme CourtUS election 2024Donald TrumpMore on this storyWhy Trump ballot eligibility is before Supreme CourtPublished5 hours agoThe 14th Amendment plan to disqualify Trump, explainedPublished19 hours agoVoter panel: What it means that Trump got kicked off the ballotPublished21 December 2023Top StoriesLive. Joe Biden ‘wilfully retained’ classified files, investigation findsStarmer defends U-turn on £28bn green spendingPublished3 hours agoKing doing ‘extremely well’ after diagnosis, says Queen. VideoKing doing ‘extremely well’ after diagnosis, says QueenPublished2 hours agoFeaturesWhat does Putin gain from Tucker Carlson interview?’We are surrounded’ – Guarding the Middle East’s most dangerous borderWhat happened to Labour’s £28bn for green projects?North Koreans working in China ‘exploited like slaves’Listen: Starmer faces backlash over scaling back of green plan. AudioListen: Starmer faces backlash over scaling back of green planAttributionSoundsParis 2024 medals to include Eiffel Tower metalAttributionSportI rarely saw people like me in lead roles, says One Day starClimbing Everest? You need to bring your poo backDisney boss betting big on Taylor Swift and Fortnite to boost streaming serviceElsewhere on the BBC’If I can’t live with you, I don’t want to live anyway’The Hungarian footballer executed for loveAttributionSoundsFrom the seizure of Crimea to the war in UkraineThe inside story of a decade of clashes, as told by the Western leaders who traded blows with PutinAttributioniPlayerFrom The Fall to Fifty ShadesActor Jamie Dornan shares the soundtrack of his life with Lauren LaverneAttributionSoundsHow do they make two million litres of stout per day?Gregg Wallace hops into the world of Irish stout at the Guinness brewery in DublinAttributioniPlayerMost Read1What does Putin gain from Tucker Carlson interview?2King doing ‘extremely well’ after diagnosis – Queen3Snow and ice warnings as cold blast to continue4Fashion icons assemble for Enninful’s last Vogue5Blue cards for sin-binned players to be trialledAttributionSport6Pizza takeaway raid in search for Clapham suspect7US court sceptical of move to bar Trump from ballot8Nuclear fusion leap brings clean power dream closer9Starmer defends U-turn on £28bn green spending10New Iceland eruption triggers state of emergency
newsinsightplus.com
